Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PinchasC

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

PinchasC[edit]

Final (45/0/0) ended 01:39 , 22 December 2005 (UTC)

PinchasC (talk · contribs) – Pinchas has been around since March 11 2005, and has been working mainly on articles related to Judaism. He is a scrupulous RC patroller, has welcomed numerous new editors, and has now accumulated 2921 edits, of which 1600 namespace, 211 talk and 221 project (including numerous difficult VFDs). I think for his anti-vandalism work alone he is already deserving of the mop. JFW | T@lk 23:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I accept. Thank you. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 01:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Strong pre-nominator support! Good vandal-whacker. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 01:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, unlikely to abuse admin tools. I saw this being made while doing RC yesterday and was looking forward to supporting. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Great vandal fighter! Olorin28 02:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support looks fine to me.--MONGO 03:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong Support Excellent vandal figher --Jaranda wat's sup 03:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Pinchas, good vandal fighter and comimtted to the project. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 03:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support contribs and answers to question look fine. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Good vandal fighter, use of tools unlikely to be misued. xaosflux Talk/CVU 04:22, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Good user, good atitude, can be trusted with the extra tools. Rx StrangeLove 04:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Good vandal fighter. --Adam1213 Talk + 05:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support - usually beats me to the vandals. Great contributor. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. King of All the Franks 05:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support. Good and responsible contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:03, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Timezone-impaired sleepy nominator support. JFW | T@lk 08:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. First to vote after nominator support. ;) ナイトスタリオン ✉ 09:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support. —Kirill Lokshin 13:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support. KHM03 16:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Extreme Support. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 20:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support no reason not to. Izehar (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support easy vote, thanks :)Gator (talk) 21:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support with pleasure. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support. Good contributions.--Dakota t e 02:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support good editor, good candidate for admin --rogerd 05:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support, as almost all his recent edits have been 'rvv's, he could definitely make sensible and good use of the functions. Proto t c 10:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support, as all his instincts and skills are in the right place. IZAK 11:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support per nomination. --Ian Pitchford 22:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Definitely. the wub "?!" 00:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support, absolutely. Antandrus (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support, just coming down to visit my neigbour below me on Rfa. Croat Canuck 06:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support good contribs, good protection of the 'pedia. Would like to see how he wields a mop. =) jnothman talk 15:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Potential admin written all over this one. — Moe ε 16:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support He beat me many times before in reverting when I wasn't an admin; I can't imagine how fast he'll be with the rollback button!--Shanel 03:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. Jayjg (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support. El_C 12:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support. --Aude 15:35, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support pgk(talk) 20:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support - lots of good admin activity in the past 500 edits. Could be more involved in Wikipedia talk, though. Renata3 19:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support. We need more vandal fighters. Carioca 00:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support good contributor. --Kefalonia 13:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support -- Svest 18:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)  Wiki me up™[reply]
  41. Support --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 20:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Support, we need knowledgeble people like Pinchas. Knowing him personally I can say there is no one better for the job! 220.233.48.200 21:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support. -- DS1953 talk 05:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Qualified Support. Very rarely, needs to keep WP:CIV on a more prominent burner. (pot and kettle, I know...) Tomertalk 08:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Very Strong Support he is a good user. I vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk 16:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support I've seen him on RC patrol; good at keeping the vandals at bay. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 22:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

  • What a boring RfA... Only support votes... :) Renata3 19:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
At least my deleted vote because I don't want to register, made it interesting... 220.233.48.200 10:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A. The main area that I see myself using my admin powers, would be to block persistent vandals. Having done some work in RC patrol and the Counter Vandalism Unit I have first hand experience with dealing with the vandals that try to ruin other users experience.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. In regards to contributing to articles, I am particularly pleased with the work that I did creating the Tzadik article which helped resolve some discussion relating to some Jewish theological discussions at the Chabad article.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. (Not counting the vandals which have been in conflict with me and my User page) Due to the areas which I am involved in, there often arises differences of opinion regarding the interpretation of Judaism and its Rabbis particularly in the Chabad area. However, despite some heavy personal attacks against me, I have always resolved all issues without resorting to personal attacks or violating any of the rules of wikipedia. In fact one of the users that I had difference of opinion is JFW who as you can see from this that he nominated, we work together on improving articles and all our differences have been resolved.
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/PinchasC&oldid=1146518188"