Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Echo myself

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Echo myself

Final (0/3/1); Ended 05:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Echo myself (talk · contribs) – I discovered wikipedia yesterday and i feel that i will be a great moderator here. i have been a moderator in lots of great internet forums including but not limited to slashdot, somethingawful, meatspin, and also an admin of youtube. i believe i will be a great moderator at wikipedia and i hope to be one. Echo myself 04:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

accept

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: hmm i guess i will ban spammers and delete spam post.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: i think it will be Public domain (internet) im very pleased.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: some asshole try to delete my Public domain (internet) and i put it back. In future if i will ban him.

General comments

• See Echo myself's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

---

Discussion

Support

Oppose

1. Strong Oppose- Seven edits, if I counted right, only around for about a day, and admins don't ban people for no reason (or call people assholes). Stay longer and learn some things before running--SUIT⁴² 04:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose. Very immature, a fool, or a troll. (Public domain (internet), created by this user, is so bad it's almost funny.) I suggest zapping this RfA early. -- Hoary 05:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
3. Automatic Oppose - for obvious reasons. Only had to read questions to decide. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 05:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Urge withdrawal I'm sorry, Echo. It's absolutely great to see new users be so enthusiastic about Wikipedia. However, most candidates for administrator are not accepted until they have a few thousand edits. With that said, I encourage you dig deep into Wikipedia (and feel free to ask me personally, or contact your friendly neighborhood admin, if you have any questions). -- Kicking222 05:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.