Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chinnz
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Chinnz[edit]
Final (0/2/0); ended 10:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC) - Early close - this request was made too soon. — Scott • talk 10:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination[edit]
Chinnz (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER [[User:Chinnz|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green"><b>C h i n n Z </b></font></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Chinnz|<font color="violet">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Chinnz|<font color="violet">Contrib</font>]])</sup> (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate[edit]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Improving wikipedia's contents to its standards and managing the users
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I mainly contributed to my local articles, because Iam having enough Knowledge to edit it.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Not yet had any conflict. In future I will try to handle it in a silent manner so that no one hurts.
General comments[edit]
- Links for Chinnz: Chinnz (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Chinnz can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion[edit]
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support[edit]
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose While undoubtedly a Good Faith contributor, I don't see any demonstration of admin related experience or sufficient experience with Wikipedia in general. The extraordinarily short answers make me think this was a spur of the moment thing you didn't prepare for, also. ★★RetroLord★★ 09:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP: Not now: improve your relations with the orthography and make somewhat more edits, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.