Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 4, 2022.

San Jose[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To have “San Jose” redirect to the California city and “San José” redirect to the Costa Rica city

Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Keep as dab, and no accent redirect to the dab. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This nomination is very confusing due to some errors made when nominating. San Jose is currently a redirect to the disambiguation page San José (which is not a redirect at all). Note also there is a discussion on Talk:San José#Proposing a split of redirects about this same issue raised by the nom. I don't think this is the right venue for this discussion (since changing the target of San Jose is not all that is being considered). A7V2 (talk) 04:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I do not know if RFD may be the right venue either. The proposal seems to involve converting the disambiguation page into a primary redirect, then splitting the resulting moved disambiguation page based on whether entries have the accented "é" or not. Either way this would contradict both WP:DIACRITICS and MOS:DIACRITICS when they state that you should still provide redirects from alternative forms that use or exclude diacritics. Zzyzx11 (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I have removed San José from the nomination, because it is not a redirect (it's a disambiguation page), and I have corrected the current target for San Jose. The nomination suggests that San José be a redirect to San José, Costa Rica; this would require a requested move discussion to consider moving San José to San José (disambiguation) (i.e., Rfd is the wrong venue for discussing this proposal, as it doesn't involve a current redirect). Mdewman6 (talk) 03:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This might be worth closing early as this overlaps with the concurrent discussion at Talk:San José#Proposing a split of redirects; this is a dupliate discussion but only addresses half the issue being considered per A7V2. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, keep as a dab redirect per those above. BD2412 T 00:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ytterbium dodecaboride[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – Even though it's not mentioned at the target, it is a name within the group discussed there, and points the way toward future improvement. Dicklyon (talk) 16:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There is no longer a section or anchor for borides, but YbB12 definitely exists and could be mentioned at the target. ComplexRational (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah, not just that it's not mentioned at target, but that target section doesn't exist. He should have said. The fix is obviously not "delete". Dicklyon (talk) 03:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (ie oppose delete) - Seems I created the redirect, and made the target section [empty at that time] (but it was quickly deleted : "14:05, 16 September 2018‎ DePiep 38,043 bytes −92‎ →‎Borides: could be OK & GF but not as an empty section") - I'm inclined to undo the deletion of the target empty section, and look for the sources that prompted me to create the redirect in the first place. - Rod57 (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rod57 is yet to add back the section.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 16:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no prejudice against recreating when Rod57 gets around to recreating the section. casualdejekyll 02:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm not Rod57, nor do I play them on TVWikipedia, but I re-instated Ytterbium#Borides and wrote content about ytterbium dodecaboride there. DMacks (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now that it was added Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mustard sauce[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 13#Mustard sauce

Vivicam3915[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Vivicam3915

1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a fragment of the full systematic name "6-[1-(2-Hydroxy-6-methylbenzoyl)oxyethyl]-1-phenazinecarboxylic acid", no evidence this part is actually used as a shortened form for this specific compound. However, some databases have a standard of inverting the name to give the class first, so for example PubChem has as a single synonymous term "1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid, 6-[1-[(2-hydroxy-6-methylbenzoyl)oxy]ethyl]-". Doesn't mean "1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid" is itself a synonym. DMacks (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The redirect refers to a different compound for which we do not currently have an article. The synonomous phenazine-1-carboxylic acid is mentioned in 8 articles and is red-linked in one. Delete until a stub can be created for the correct compound. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't think to look for this as an actual compound under synonyms in other articles. I'd be happy to write the stub article for phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (Q27131864)...which name should be the actual article vs redirect to it? DMacks (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: I'm not sure what would be the most common name for the compound. It looks like it may be Tubermycin B. It is also known as Shenqinmycin. CAS refers to it as 1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid. Based on a quick perusal, it looks the status quo on WP favors the Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid syntax, e.g. Anthracene-9-carbaldehyde, Naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid if it lacks a trivial name. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Old Catholic Confederation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is the name of a specific independent, non-notable organisation (whose website is this) which is not mentioned at the target anymore.
Therefore, I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Peculiarities of the genocide of the Tutsis in regards to other genocides[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term, not a proper name of a published paper nor is this dimension of the genocide really discussed in detail at the target. Originally created as an article outline in 2005, but no content was ever added other than an infobox, and it was converted to a redirect later that year. Deletion seems appropriate until if/when an article specifically analyzing the Rwandan genocide in comparison to other genocides can be written. signed, Rosguill talk 18:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cheers, Spicemix (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for reasons outlined above, though even if we were to make a page on comparisons I doubt we’d use this title. -Indy beetle (talk) 20:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anna Mamalat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Former A&M tennis player not mentioned at the target, briefly mentioned at the articles for a few tournaments she competed in. Deleting to allow for search results seems most appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 18:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gideon Richards[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A very confusing redirect. I clicked on this name from Fitz Hughes Predators expecting to get an article on this footballer but instead was redirected to an article on a pornographic actor in which 'Gideon Richards' isn't even mentioned once! Looking at John Holmes' credits, I can't even see that he ever played a character of this name so have no idea why this redirect was created in 2007. This redirect does not benefit the encyclopaedia in any way so should be deleted. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Calvis Harris[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems implausible. If you actually typed this in and the redirect didn't exist "Calvin Harris" would immediately pop up in suggestions. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was actually an incoming link using this typo, meant to refer to the current target. I have corrected the link to point directly to the target. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not a frequent enough misspelling to warrant a redirect Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, this would be quite an unusual misspelling. BD2412 T 00:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

5o Cent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an unlikely search term Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why not? doesnt hurt to have it -- FMSky (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know why it exists but its been here since 2011, and has a max of 90 views/mo, and not a hurtful. Keep Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Middlesborough in the 2010 general election[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 13#Middlesborough in the 2010 general election

Parmotrema tinctorum[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because Parmotrema tinctorum is a species, not a genus. In addition, the page parmotrema does not have any information on Parmotrema tinctorum so it might cause confusion for users. Roostery123 (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a valid {{R from species to genus}}? And maybe {{R with possibilities}}. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)e[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Polymer impregnation[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Polymer impregnation

Green state[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. A link to the Wiktionary entry will also be placed on the dab. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous term. I've seen "green state" to refer to states where the Green Party has control, states that are environmentally friendly, or states where cannabis is legal. Given the wide variety of uses I've seen for the term, this does not seem to be the ideal target. Either delete or cross-redirect to Wiktionary. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Green state should become an article or be redirected to Green politics Loremaster (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it does appear to be ambiguous, and I also found an article using it in the political science sense that predates the 2004 article at the target [1]. signed, Rosguill talk 20:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • If it's ambiguous there can be a disambiguation page. Until another use is added it can be a redirect. 86.141.247.208 (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      The Green party and cannabis contexts don't really lend themselves to dab entries, but are nevertheless possible as search terms; allowing for internal search results is thus preferable, IMO. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      It is when there is nothing with the title. "Green state redirects here, for other uses see wikt:green state" is possible. There is nothing about cannabis in search results or in wikt:green state so is there something that can be added? 86.141.247.208 (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate between the current target to which The Green State redirects, and Eco-nationalism to which Green nationalism redirects (and which also covers green politics). Deletion to aid internal search results does not help as there are thousands of entries, all pointing to Bowling Green State University. Could not find a reference of the term in context of cannabis legalization on enwiki. Jay (talk) 06:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further consideration of the late disambiguating proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft redirect to wikt:Green state, seems plausible. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate - The idea of some area being "a green state" is a general one that can relate to multiple articles. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. If a term can refer to several concepts, and there's relevant content about them here on Wikipedia, then you don't send readers away to other sites or present them with largely irrelevant search results, what you do is disambiguate. I've drafted a dab below the redirect (though I'm not sure how a link to Green nationalism can fit there). – Uanfala (talk) 12:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have attempted something there for Green nationalism. Feel free to modify or remove it. Jay (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_4&oldid=1098320591"