Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 9, 2020.

Template:User GoogleChrome2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 18#Template:User GoogleChrome2

Pit droid[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Droid (Star Wars). There's only a weak consensus for retargeting, but my impression is that everyone would prefer this solution to the current status quo. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This specific fictional element has a few mentions in various articles but no actual coverage, with no mention at all in the target article. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Droid (Star Wars).  Bait30  Talk? 23:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    That article only mentions a specific named one, there's not enough coverage to justify a redirect. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Would it not fall under R from subtopic? I'm new to RfD so I'm still getting the hang of it.  Bait30  Talk? 08:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

More Music from Peter Gunn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural listing; redirect was blanked by Patricia Tegtmeier. See User Talk:Drbogdan#"More Music from Peter Gunn" ≠ "The Music from Peter Gunn". The concern seems to be that while this is briefly mentioned at the target, it's a separate album that should stay a red link there. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(fixing broken ping to Patricia Tegtmeier. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - as OA of the Redirect, whatever is decided by WP:CONSENSUS is *entirely* ok with me, no problem whatsoever - hope this helps in some way - Drbogdan (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete The only other alternative I see is retargeting to Peter Gunn#Music, but the information there is so sparse, and just by the name of the album, it's unlikely readers wouldn't think to go straight to Peter Gunn if that's what they wanted. --BDD (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hadn't noticed the article is covering the second album too. That seems a bit iffy to me, but means the redirect is fine. --BDD (talk) 01:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, the target article covers both albums. Perhaps there should be a split, but unless that happens I'm fine with the status quo. -- Tavix (talk) 18:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, tag as {{R from album}}, and possibly categorise it. The target contains useful information: the release details and the tracklisting. Unless More Music can be shown to independently pass WP:NALBUM, the redirect looks entirely appropriate. Compare what I did with the non-notable book Cut for Partners. Narky Blert (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eþþa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not an alternative spelling. According to Wiktionary, this is an alternative spelling of the old English word for "or". I don't know if that's enough to justify a wiktionary link, but I don't think there's any article on enWiki that this is a suitable redirect for. signed, Rosguill talk 22:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned here. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Espagueti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing particularly Spanish about spaghetti. Delete per WP:RLOTE. Some of these appear to be misspellings that based on internet results are Spanish misspellings. signed, Rosguill talk 22:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sexually suggestive content[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Sexual content. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not synonymous, I would suggest deletion unless a better target can be found. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Content featuring implied sexual acts
  2. Content depicting fetishes in action or discussing fetishes
  3. Content about sex scandals or leaking of private intimate photos or videos
  4. Content related to the sex industry including sex-related entertainment
  5. Content discussing intimate sexual experiences such as masturbation, intercourse, or other sexual acts
  6. Content featuring sex toys, sexual devices, or other products intended to enhance sexual activity
  7. Content giving advice on sexual performance or recounting stories around performance

And another: https://www.connectsafely.org/wp-content/uploads/Sexually-explicit-content-.pdf So I think that they can be:

  • Pornography or pornographic content/ media
  • Erotica or non-pornographic sexually explicit content/ media

Or this article can redirect to page "Sexual content" unless you accept that. AneHara (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting to Sexual content sounds like the best option. signed, Rosguill talk 06:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Forever Love (1992 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target nor in any of its sources. Note as well that Backstreet Dreams is a 1990 film. I wasn't able to find any films by the name Forever Love searching online. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete. The disambiguation page Forever Love lists four unrelated movies by that title (as well as The Color of Love, released under Forever Love in the United Kingdom and also unrelated), and describes Backstreet Dreams as having been released under the title Forever Love in the Philippines. However, there's no mention of that title in the article (or (the year of) its release in that country), and a search on Google and iMDB turned out to be fruitless for me. -Regards, SONIC678 04:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not mentioned. If the film was titled Forever Love and was released to the Philippines in 1992 as a notable release, then it can be mentioned there as well as the disambiguation. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Matsuoka Shirojirō[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. I tried finding various possible transcriptions of Shirojirō on the linked jaWiki article but wasn't able to find anything. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The name Shirojiro was mentioned on a previous edit of Republic of Ezo. I've never seen the name personally, couldn't find a specific citation for the name, and don't know of any other Matsuoka that had a leadership role at Ezo so assumed it must be an alternate name for Bankichi that I didn't know of so figured I should redirect instead of simply editing out in case there was something I missed. Matsujima (talk) 07:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The Japanese Wikipedia article on Matsuoka Bankichi says that he and Matsuoka Shirojiro (松岡四郎次郎) are different people who are frequently confused with each other. Printed sources also list the two men as holding different positions [1]. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

29.9792458°E[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. This is half of a coordinate, but not a correct half. A Google search seems to indicate that 29.9792458 degrees north is part of the coordinates, but that the east coordinate is a different number. Could also refer to other places, given that this is a latitude/longitude line with only half of the coordinates. Hog Farm (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sher-e-Ban National Cricket Stadium[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 18#Sher-e-Ban National Cricket Stadium

List of stuff[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible, “stuff” isn't only lists of lists. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Implausible and too vague to retarget to anything else. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, could conceivably refer to any list. "Stuff" is too vague. Hog Farm (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I recall, my thinking in creating this was that it was a reasonably plausible search term for someone looking for an index of the topics covered by Wikipedia, and that List of lists of lists satisfies that goal to some extent. Basically Wikipedia:Contents, in other words (which might be a better target, aside from that it would be a CNR). Seems like it's better than nothing for that search. If consensus is to delete, though, I won't be heartbroken; I do see how those aren't quite the right target for this, and there isn't anything closer as far as I'm aware. Call it a weak keep, I guess? —{{u|Goldenshimmer}} (they/them)｜Talk｜Contributions 21:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Stuff" and "List" are not synonyms. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2w1[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a commonly used abbreviation for this topic. Hog Farm (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – very unlikely to be a search term. Senator2029 “Talk” 09:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A search turned up a protein called 2W1; De Vere Field, an airfield at Cle Elum, Washington with ICAO code 2W1; a large amount of woo relating to enneagrams; and nothing about WWI at all. Narky Blert (talk) 13:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete kind of a typo since 2 is next to W, but not likely neologism. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the type literally translates to two war one, nobody understands this synonym. Editoneer (talk) 19:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete′ the First World War isn’t abbreviated like this, we don’t have an article on the airfield, and while we do have an article about Enneagram of Personality it doesn’t mention the term either.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Killa City[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 19#Killa City

Symcor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. No consensus prior to the relist, and no further comments after the relist. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is mentioned in the target, but note that Toronto-Dominion Bank is only one of three owners of Symcor, the largest back office cheque clearing service provider in Canada. The other owners include Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal, so, per WP:XY, we have multiple potential targets here. Symcor may be notable in its own right, and I would like to add this to my list of articles to write, so per WP:XY and WP:R#D10, I'm proposing that we delete this redirect to encourage article creation. Doug Mehus T·C 02:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for now since it describes the other three banks in that paragraph. Add {{R with possibilities}} and feel free to start up a draft or boldly edit it into an actual stub article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams (change)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the (change) at the end makes it seem like an unlikely search term. -Regards, SONIC678 05:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams -[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the dash at the end necessary? -Regards, SONIC678 05:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Nonsubstantive punctuation at the end of a redirect is not plausible. Hog Farm (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not part of the video game title stylization, looks like a typo. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fishspinner[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infrequently used WP:NEOLOGISM. Was kept in 2005 in a discussion with little involvement, (see [[2]]), but I'm not getting the uses for hurricanes on Google that the discussion mentions - It's all about fishing lures. Hog Farm (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – very unlikely search term. No matter how 'hip' someone is with modern slang, their not going to type fishspinner when looking for info on hurricanes. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. My first thought was Spinnerbait, often called just "a spinner". Narky Blert (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

European Imperialism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 18#European Imperialism

Annoying Thing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like The Most Annoying Thing in the Universe, this could refer to practically anything. TheAwesomeHwyh 02:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Per the first sentence of the article, an alternative name for the subject of the target article is "The Annoying Thing". The variation of that without the word "The" (in other words, the nominated redirect) is a plausible modification of that search term. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shuttle-A[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Orbiter (simulator). The nom's !vote makes consensus clear; there are no objections to this retarget. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous with the fictional spacecraft on Orbiter (simulator). Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 16:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 01:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Algorithmic design[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 18#Algorithmic design

HDMMX (instruction set)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've found nothing to indicate that Intel's MMX was ever called "HDMMX"; what "HDMMX" I've found on the Intertubes has nothing to do with MMX, so this redirect should perhaps be deleted. Guy Harris (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I can find no evidence that the instruction set was ever known by this, or that it was ever offered in HD. Hog Farm (talk) 19:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_9&oldid=946531236"