Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 17, 2020.

Star Wars 6.5[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't appear to be a widely recognized numbering for this film. I would suggest deletion unless evidence of use in a reliable source can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Number doesn't make any sense whatsoever, as it neither takes place after the sixth film chronologically nor was it produced until after 8 other films were produced. oknazevad (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bwanaz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any evidence that this is actually an alternative name for the subject. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 22:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Impotus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a derogatory, non-neutral name given to Trump, with unclear notability. Natg 19 (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned in the target, if nothing else. Narky Blert (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and it's also ambiguous. There are, potentially, more than one "impotus" (assuming that's even a word). --Doug Mehus T·C 19:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oven Toast Grill[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 26#Oven Toast Grill

Phosphorus monoxide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Redirect has been expanded into an article now. I'm going to be bold and non-admin close this as out of the scope of RFD now. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 04:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a good to redirect from an individual chemical to a chemistry set index page such as Phosphorus oxide. In addition, phoshorus monoxide was linked there until recently, creating a circular link. Leyo 20:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leyo: FWIW - As OA of the rd - it's ok with me regardless of whatever is finally decided - I'm *entirely* flexible with this - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leyo: The earlier rd for "Phosphorus monoxide" has now been updated to a newly created article - at least for starters - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. --Leyo 22:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prayer for the Universel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probably a typo, and not mentioned at target Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prayer of Invocation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These terms appear not be exclusive to sufism. I suggest delete since they are not mentioned in the article and they may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete These terms could refer to many different things, and are ambiguous. Hog Farm (talk) 04:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ryazat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear why these terms redirect to the target article, and they might be ambiguous and therefore cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blessing(Universal Sufism)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these two redirects with missing spaces. Note the spaced versions exist (and are listed separately below). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

(Universal Sufism) redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The terms outside the brackets are not mentioned in the current target article, and neither is "Universal Sufism". A better target might be Western Sufism (to which Universal sufism redirects) but that article does mention the terms outside the brackets either. I therefore suggest delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects from closed Wikipedias[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by 14.207.206.101 / WP:SNOW keep. (non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T·C 14:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are come from closed Wikipedias, and aren't needed at all. I will suggest deletion. 14.207.202.253 (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stark Armor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Stark Industries. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_17&oldid=937706085"