Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 17, 2019.

Fathers of Confederation definition[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum, this should be retargeted to the main article Fathers of Confederation. But it's also seriously worth considering deletion. In past discussions, we've disfavored most redirects with "definition" in the title or similar (ex. 1, ex. 2). We tend to make exceptions, or at least split more meaningfully, for topics where there's substantive discussion about definitions (ex.). While Fathers of Confederation does define the term and has a note about other individuals that may be considered such, I don't believe this merits this awkward, Google-style redirect. As I write this, I've settled on delete as a first choice, but wouldn't oppose a simple retarget if there isn't consensus to delete. --BDD (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – That is very awkward and the rationale to get rid of it is sound. Anyone hunting for "fathers of confederation" will be able to find that via autocomplete without needing the " definition" part tacked on. —Joeyconnick (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a search engine; the article says it all without the need to include "definition" while searching. ComplexRational (talk) 22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Collected Poems of Robert Frost (1930)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. The article has been moved over the redirect. --BDD (talk) 15:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong year, presumably created in error. I nominated this for speedy deletion, not once but twice, but both were declined. ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 18:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article says 1930. Can you provide sources that say 1940? Because right now I think the solution is a plate of trout and moving it back. Praxidicae (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at this, it looks like it was originally published in 1930. The first book on the list says it was the third edition published in 1940. This should be moved back. ~ GB fan 18:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bacoon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional setting not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category talk:Transphobic Wikipedians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G8. -- Tavix (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. Redirect is offensive/abusive and libellous. (If this is in the wrong section, please let me know) Yilangren (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Naturon Demonto[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect term not mentioned in given target. Hildeoc (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is a misspelled version of an an alternate name. In the Evil Dead franchise, the Necronomicon Ex-Mortis is also called the Naturom Demonto. ―Susmuffin Talk 17:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jireh[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#Jireh

Nimraviscus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Suitable evidence was provided that the redirect is appropriate. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 18:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Per this less-than-reliable source, it would seem that maybe Nimravidae is a more appropriate target? [1] signed, Rosguill talk 07:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Explaner, Thank you, withdrawing this nomination. signed, Rosguill talk 18:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ictidailurus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Suitable evidence was provided that the redirect is appropriate. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 18:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target, I couldn't verify in an internet search whether it has any relation to Nimravus. Delete unless a justification is provided. signed, Rosguill talk 07:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, withdrawing the nomination. signed, Rosguill talk 18:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kostolac culture[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#Kostolac culture

Yemeni mafia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously no one has called the Houthi movement the Yemeni mafia. SharabSalam (talk) 07:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hiroshi Suzuki (tarento)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Even if phrased as "weak", I think that the responses thus far suggest that this redirect could be useful. Withdrawing my nomination. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 17:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem like a useful disambiguator, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 07:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_17&oldid=1099899781"