Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 21[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 21, 2019.

Parsey McParseface[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Parsey McParseface

Arella x[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally a copy (not an exact copy) of the article at Arella with a random x added to the title, that was inexplicably turned into a redirect. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as useless; I highly doubt that the character has ever been called this. Geolodus (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Talk:White-eyed river martin/GA8[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion. A GA nomination was erroneously created here, and I moved it to the correct page name. These redirects are now implausible typos. While it seems unlikely this article will need an 8th good article nomination, having these redirects pollutes search results by giving the misleading impression that 8 GA reviews were carried out for this article.

As a side note, link-wise, this is an extremely clean-cut deletion because they were never linked to; they weren't transcluded directly after the GA, but instead substituted, and {{Article history}} only had a link after I added it. Even if there were links, the deletion message will contain a link to this discussion, so such concerns would be unwarranted eπi (talk | contribs) 19:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, although I wrote the article, I've no idea how this redirect arose and no objection to its removal Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G7 I see no reason why these redirects are needed to be kept and because the nominator is the sole author, I see no reason why it can't be speedy deleted. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wholesomeness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. See also: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 5#Wholesomeness. -- Tavix (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page has a chequered history as a (pseudo)-dab, redirect and now soft redirect. I suggest delete to leave a redlink as per Wholesome. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. Yes, I'm good with that. Delete & salt. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bosque (programming language)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Microsoft and open source. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created redirect to the language's proponent, Microsoft, but no mention in that article. Would be better deleted than redirected to an article that does not discuss it, and any significant discussion there would be inappropriate. This is destined to be a useless and misleading redirect, and prevents a redlink that would encourage the article's creation if/when it justified.

See also comment on talk page: Talk:Bosque (programming language). TJRC (talk) 17:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That article doesn't really cover Bosque, though, does it? The only mention of Bosque is one bullet item in a short list of open-source projects. No coverage at all. TJRC (talk) 03:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The (sourced) listing is sufficient to justify the redirect. czar 09:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget or Draftify: I observe Czar is the author of the target and is not requiring all members of the list to have articles. I'd also note Bosque appears to be a new kid on the block and may or may not sustain. may be WP:TOOSOON. directing to Micorsoft was too big a WP:SURPRISE. I think I'd prefer draftify initially to try to develop more substantial underlying article, even if that effort was to be redirected on return to mainspace. It's a fine balance. It redirecting goto Microsoft and open source#Products.Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd go with Draftify as between these two options. Microsoft and open source#Products has only three words on Bosque: "Bosque programming language". Not even a complete sentence. A reader is not well-served by being redirected there.
Move it to Draft and if the notability of the language can be established, it can be moved to mainspace. TJRC (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

What about to write an extremly short article about that language, using the same effort as above but instead of wasting the effort for discussing whether where to redirect or not to redirect the article.

SAY: "(1) Bosque is a general purpose programming language without loops, mutable state and reference equalities. (2) It's syntax and types are inspired by TypeScript. (3) It's semantics is coming from ML and Node/JavaScript. (4) This language is the brainchild of Mark Marron, a computer scientist at Microsoft. (5) There is a GitHub repo under the subtree "Microsoft". [1] See more information there."

Anyways, I suggest to refrain from evaluating the language Bosque in any manner, since MicroSoft has the right to have a good image. It is a clear message, that nobody from MicroSoft culture is writing here any word into the article about this language.

prohlep (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe you can establish notability for the programming language, go for it. I'm not certain it's notable given the very little coverage it's gotten; it may sink without a trace, some things like this do. A github repository is not enough to establish notability, and that seems to be the most prominent source. I've seen a little bit of news coverage, but WP:NOTNEWS, and what I've seen does not appear to establish notability. TJRC (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Addicted to men[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect page name is absurd; I recommend deleting it. RfDing this was discussed on the article talk page here. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 11:11, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nuked from orbit per WP:SNOWBALL. It's absurdly implausible, and was only created a year ago. -- The Anome (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

যোগীন্দ্রনাথ সরকার[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:RFOREIGN (non-admin closure) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

en wiki does not need redirects from non-en languages Tagishsimon (talk) 10:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • I'm the creator of the article, and I wasn't aware of this guideline. This is the name of the person in their native language. I think such redirects (from native language to English language) should be acceptable. User:WoodElf 13:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a standard case of WP:RFOREIGN. – Uanfala (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Uanfala. feminist (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dave Mattingly (Producer/Newscaster)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The DAB target with a fresh red link isn't as it should be, David Mattingly (radio) was deleted in 2009. 84.46.53.14 (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ajax (superhero)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Ajax (superhero)

Wiki/mining[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term. feminist (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counos[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Counos

The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 30#The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle

Schools Climate Action Ireland[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 30#Schools Climate Action Ireland

Move to article space[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Clear pagemove mistake, as evident from the history. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is the relations with Extinction Rebellion (and other articles)? B dash (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Racism of low expectations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Racism of low expectations

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_21&oldid=1072177089"