Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 January 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 10, 2015.

Ku ray on pap[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is extremely unlikely to be used as a search term. Random86 (talk) 21:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and look into other redirects from the creator; the person who created this looks to have been farting around creating implausible redirects such as this for years, but hasn't edited since April 2014. Obviously this one is implausible. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 06:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I thought of that being the literal transcription for the Hangul name, but Google translate gave "keuleyongpab", so yeah. No comment on follow-up suggested by TBoNL. 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 15:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above.--Lenticel (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File talk:Stifado.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G8 by an admin. I believe the discussion can now be closed uncontroversially by anyone. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing redirect. File:Stifado (2).jpg is a different file. I'm not sure if this could be tagged with a speedy tag or not. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. This redirect is part of what I and my fellow filemovers have been doing recently to file names that have the same name as another on Wikimedia Commons and thus deny access to it:
    1. Rename local file
    2. Remove {{ShadowsCommons}} template
    3. Replace all transclusion
    4. Tag the now-orphaned redirect that blocks access to Commons file for deletion per G6.
All these steps are followed about File:Stifado.JPG and RHaworth carried out the G6 deletion. Only its talk page, was omitted from deletion because of an oversight. I will notify RHaworth of this discussion. Hopefully, this discussion can be ended with speedy deletion, per WP:SNOW.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Meghan Elizabeth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. See WP:PTM why this wouldn't make a very good redirect to Megan. --BDD (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are many people with the names "Meghan Elizabeth", so this is a vague and implausible redirect as not everyone would automatically think of the singer Meghan Trainor when someone says "Meghan Elizabeth". Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: I was unaware, for now I have fixed it to Megan. If you would have talked to me before coming here, it would have saved you this RFd effort.-- Marano fan 07:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's not exactly a plausible redirect either, I'm afraid :/ Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Snuggles - There's millions of people named Megan Elizabeth, Plus everyone knows her more as Megan Trainor than Megan Elizabeth. –Davey2010Talk 03:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no indication in the article that this performer was ever popularly known as "Meghan Elizabeth"; redirect is misleading. Proposed retarget to Megan is not better. Ivanvector (talk) 15:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kevin Spacey Call of Duty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this doesn't make sense and it appears like a Google search sequence. Further, the creator has been blocked for vandalism. Jorm (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an implausible redirect Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete According to the article, Spacey was praised for his performance for the game. However, I don't think it warrants this redirect since the performance is merely a small part of the game.--Lenticel (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as what is essentially a WP:NOTFANSITE violation. Steel1943 (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I just found the correct page because of this redirect. Sound ridiculous, but yeah. 129.98.152.181 (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.