Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 19, 2013

Minor league baseball players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except for those withdrawn. Wizardman 19:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete These players are either no longer affiliated with or listed on the pages are redirected to. Note that Peter Parise and Andy Graham (baseball) were originally included in a mass RfD on 26 November, however the merge removed them from the list. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: I undid the RfD for Zachary Simons, article is located at Zach Simons. Have retargeted redirect as such. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kyle Lobstein nomination withdrawn, this exercise is only to remove those redirects for players that are no longer listed within the targeted articles. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Kyle Lobstein, delete the rest Lobstein is a Rule 5 pick from Tampa currently with the Detroit organization. I neglected to create the minor league page section that he requires, which I have now made. As he has a real chance at making the Tigers' Opening Day roster come April 1, he should be kept. The rest are non-notable minor league players who don't have notability. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep all and expand the original article Something is badly wrong here. WP is not a news site, and if we are interested in the current lineup, we are just as interested in all past line-ups if we can get the information. The proper thing to do is to edit the articles so it contains every player who has every been on the squads, or I think the article violates our general guidelines. As this is a general problem, I have brought this up at WikiProject baseball talk page also, here, for further discussion. DGG ( talk ) 03:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Neo-classical liberalism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 19:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Article Neoliberalism does not even mention Neo-classical liberalism. Previously it used to redirect to Anarcho-capitalism, which neither even mentions Neo-classical liberalism. With Google, I can't find any reliable sources about what neo-classical liberalism is. This blog entry represents it as a some kind of compromise between Liberty and Social Justice, but it's just a blog. It seems to be that Neo-classical liberalism is not a very well-established term.

Classical liberalism, however, mentions Neo-classical liberalism. Maybe this redirect should either be deleted or re-targeted to Classical liberalism. ilaiho (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per Ilaiho, pending someone writing a stub on the concept -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

பின்லாந்து[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this redirect from a language unrelated to its target. Gorobay (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary, this is not a likely search term, as it is unrelated to the country's native forms, therefore is a translation dictionary entry. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. --ilaiho (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Software implementation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 03:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially a valid title, but useless and confusing as a redirect. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the software development article states that implementation is when you produce code, so that's the reasons for its target. That said, I think Software construction would be a more expected target. Ego White Tray (talk) 13:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Application instructions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 03:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No such term and no inbound links. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_February_19&oldid=1039438062"