Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 February 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 4, 2011

White_History_Month[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Black History Month. Ruslik_Zero 19:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect should be deleted because target fails to mention White History Month. JohnValeron (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not being mentioned in the target article is not necessarily a reason to delete a redirect. Many articles are incomplete or the redirects represent content that existed in an earlier version (which may someday be restored). In this case, however, I find many online references to the general concept of "White History Month" but none especially connected with this individual. This redirect was the only substantive contribution of an editor whose contribution history spans barely 24 hours. This redirect seems inappropriate to me. It does seem, however, that a re-targeting might be the better option, though. Perhaps to Black History Month#Controversy? Rossami (talk) 05:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget. I agree with Rossami that we ought to have this as a redirect somewhere as it's a notable concept, but I can't see the connection with the current target. I've not been able to find a better target than Rossami has though, so I support his suggestion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above. Absent any better suggestion, to Rossami's suggestion of Black History Month#Controversy I guess. If the closing admin has a better idea, I'm willing to defer to that. Herostratus (talk) 18:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Template:Nala[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was kept. Thryduulf's repair made the original reasons for nomination moot. The anon's argument that the template happens to be the same as a feminine personal name is irrelevant since this is a template-space usage, not article-space. Without a valid reason to delete, the decision defaults to keep. Rossami (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template was renamed, and all of the links to the old name were redirected to the new name. However, the links to view, discuss or edit the template still redirect to the old name, which is just a redirect to the new name, creating a loop that prevents the template from being edited. Fortdj33 (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment, I've fixed the view, discuss and edit links (for future reference, see this edit), so that problem is no longer. I've got no opinion at the moment about whether the redirect should stay or not. Thryduulf (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "Nala" is a feminine personal name. 64.229.101.119 (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Robot (hindi film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep The Robot (film), Enthiram and ENDHIRAN-the robot. Delete the rest. Ruslik_Zero 19:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, Enthiran was dubbed in Hindi, but there is not an original Hindi movie titled as Robot

Deletion, a redirection with the main actor in it may be innovative, but it's by far not wp standard

Deletion, Eanthiram means machine and it's not correct to use it here Robot=Enthiran (robot)

Deletion, Eanthiram means machine and it's not correct to use it here Robot=Enthiran (robot)

Deletion, Eanthiram means machine and it's not correct to use it here Robot=Enthiran (robot)

Deletion, Eanthiram means machine and it's not correct to use it here Robot=Enthiran (robot)

Deletion, Eanthiram means machine and it's not correct to use it here Robot=Enthiran (robot)

Deletion, Enthiran was dubbed in Hindi, but there is not an original Hindi movie titled as Robot

Deletion, unusual capital letters

Deletion, The Robot is not an official title of the movie, yet. An English dubbing may change this. --Wangond (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mixed. I would say
    • Keep The Robot (film) → Enthiran (since this indicates that an English dub is only a matter of time).
    • Delete these ones: ENDHIRAN-the robot, Robot hindi. Seem unlikely.
    • Weak delete on Robot (hindi film), Robot (Rajini). Seem unlikely, but not 100% sure of this. It's a Tamil film, but it's also a Hindi film now after dubbing, and likely more known in that incarnation. Willing to defer to closing admin on this.
    • No opinion on the rest, as I am not qualified to say whether or not someone would likely type "Eanthiram" when they meant "Enthiran" and so forth. Herostratus (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Enthiram as a likely typo, and The Robot (film) per Herostratus. No opinion on the rest. Thryduulf (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "ENDHIRAN-the robot" as well - although apparently unlikely, somehow that was the one that came up on a search of a similar name when I searched for the film, and helped redirect me, so actually it's useful. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_February_4&oldid=616124229"