Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 July 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 28, 2010

WikiProject Illinois[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as WP:CSD G7 by Favonian. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a redirect to a WikiProject from namespace. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 22:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. –Grondemar 22:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Grondemar and nom. SnottyWong verbalize 23:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - it is good practice to notify the creator; now done. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the creator of the redirect, feel free to close this discussion and delete it. I wasn't 100% sure about it anyway, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Feel free to remove it. elektrikSHOOS 23:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - in view of the above comment I have tagged it for G7 deletion. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Disasters during the plauge[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, shall be burned at the stake. — ξxplicit 00:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make sense. Was created in sin and should die in fire. Muhandes (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Bad spelling. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 22:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per AirplanePro and nom. SnottyWong verbalize 23:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the misspelling certainly is no grounds for deletion; it is a common typo. However, there is no obviously good target so it should be deleted as confusing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Protected Archaeological Sites (Serbia)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget all to Cultural Heritage of Serbia. Ruslik_Zero 16:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. Those are not the same thing, actually those are very different things. Those are different categories of the protected monuments in Serbia. Redirecting one to another makes a lot of confusion, because, for example, the target article Archaeological Sites of Exceptional Importance (Serbia) says nothing about the "Protected Archaeological Sites", which is a different category. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I am surprised that the creator was not notified; now done. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - if these are misleading then that is a ground for deletion. However, the numerous internal links, presumably most from templates, must be fixed first. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • STRONG Keep - I am creator of this articles, and those redirects was created just temporary, until i create full lists. You may see here (User:Tadija/Monuments of Culture of Great Importance (Serbia)) that i am working on it, and soon redirects will be replaced with articles. If they are misleading, then i suggest that all of those should redirect to Cultural Property of Great Importance, as main article. I will do that.
Redirects moved. --Tadijaspeaks 19:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the incoming links are still there; probably transclusions? Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_July_28&oldid=1138577317"