Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 30, 2010

Christmas Eve Eve[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 00:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I removed the entry for Christmas Eve Eve in the Holidays and Observances section of December 23 per the guidelines, as any observance should have support in an independent article, and this one is pulling itself up by its own bootstraps. There doesn't seem to be any support for Christmas Eve Eve being a recognized holiday. To continue to pack Eves on seems silly. I suppose it's possible somebody might search for the term, so perhaps not completely implausible, but December 23 doesn't mention this holiday so I don't see how redirecting to it is helpful. Winston365 (talk) 21:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Malaysian interchanges[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. — ξxplicit 00:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete them all. These are all non-notable as individual entities and unlikely search terms. Around 150 interchange articles have all been PRODed with the rationale that the pertinent details would be covered in the appropriate highways' junction lists. These redirects were all merged into other articles (some after PRODs) with interchange-specific infoboxes rather than leave each as a single line in the junction list. Imzadi 1979 → 19:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Template:India-gov-mil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, will work on replacing these redirects. — ξxplicit 00:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and replace delete all instances of this transclusion and replace with its target, since this redirect is misleading as it does not show any "-stub" in its naming, thus not indicating it is a stub-type template redirect. 184.144.166.27 (talk) 18:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Douggie Young[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. — ξxplicit 00:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Secretary Of State(State)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 00:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – implausible redirect. Nothing links there. McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Dowry: Legislation and status in India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept as no consensus for deletion. -- JLaTondre (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term or link term. Danger (talk) 03:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • … but (apparently) good edit history that can be used to improve dowry law in India. This contains several things not in the redirected-to article, and even shows by example a better structure that can be used to make the article less lop-sided in place of the pro and con list structure of the current article. It seems a shame to waste that, given the problems in the redirected-to article. Uncle G (talk) 11:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Culture industry reconsidered by Theodor Adorno[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept as no consensus for deletion. -- JLaTondre (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is "a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful" (WP:RFD#DELETE). Guoguo12--Talk--  02:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – Although the redirect has not been categorised, it is a redirect from a move. McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • … and given that it was the name with which the current article was actually created in the first place, it doesn't seem wholly implausible. Uncle G (talk) 11:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_December_30&oldid=1141906745"