Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 February 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 16[edit]

National Collegiate Honor Society of MathematicsPi Mu Epsilon[edit]

The result of the debate was Kept. -- JLaTondre 16:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empty, and unhelpful. Unlikely to be confused. Avi 16:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's referred to by this name at [1] and at Mu Alpha Theta. I don't understand your reason for deletion. --- RockMFR 23:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

H-orbitalH engine[edit]

The result of the debate was Redirected H-orbital to Atomic orbital and H-block (periodic table) to Group (periodic table). Deleted other redirects. WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading, due to double redirects constructed in an attempt to clear out some more of User:Cosmium's element-spam. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also H-block (periodic table) and H-block (block)Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, clean this mess. I think several redirects were a result of closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H-block, which weirded redirects to pages whose whole meaning changed. I don't even know what a "(block)" disambiguation marker means, nuke that one. H-orbital and H-block (periodic table) could be re-routed to Atomic orbital and and Group (Periodic table) respectively, but especially the -block is completely hypothetical at this point and well beyond anything science seems likely to actually encounter in the forseeable future. DMacks 23:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.