Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 3

< March 2	March 4 >

March 3[edit]

File:Mitch Grainger in 2019.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5 uploads, 1 of it incorrectly tagged as CC-SA. Remaining for of different sizes, does not have any metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mitch Grainger performing at The Basement, Sydney in 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5 uploads, 1 of it incorrectly tagged as CC-SA. Remaining for of different sizes, does not have any metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mitch Grainger plays a Dyna-Mic prototype.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5 uploads, 1 of it incorrectly tagged as CC-SA. Remaining for of different sizes, does not have any metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mitch and Kara Grainger Headstand Shot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5 uploads, 1 of it incorrectly tagged as CC-SA. Remaining for of different sizes, does not have any metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nugzar with trophy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heavily edited, no metadata, doubtful own work. Permission needed from photographer who took this photo. See also uploader's talk page which is full of file deletion notices. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Occupy Medical Bus at Washington Street Bridge, Jan 2015.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, no metadata, thumbnail-sized. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing with no usage in the main space. Salavat (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carolyn Long (WSU Vancouver).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Larger version found elsewhere. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chest logo 2 PWS DBCA X-2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work. Permission needed. Also above c:COM:TOO Australia. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, apparently, we are not allowed anymore to take photos of our own clothing because there is always something that looks like a brand, a logo or a mark that can be recognised as something that is the property of another person or entity!?

Well, Wikipedia is going to be photo-free then, as there is ALWAYS such things on clothing. Besides, I made sure that the generic digital logo was not employed on my page, but only a photo of my public servant uniform, which logo is designed to be seen, recognised and dealt accordingly by members of the public.

Are you going to suppress all photos with army uniforms because you do not have the authorisation to show them from their government? Are you going to suppress all photos of sport's national teams because they have the logo of their national federation or the brand of the clothing enterprise? This is ridiculous!!

However, feel free to suppress whatever you want, Wikipedia is now at hands of sensors that are the Ayatollah of the "good" and "right" thinking, while the rest of the world is wrong. Destruction is a kind of creativity for some. Aussie Oc (talk) 04:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads are straight up pictures of the logos and they are used incorrectly (license). These are considered WP:Derivative works and even though the photo, taken by you, is under a CC-SA license, permission is still needed from relevant entities as the logos can't be considered to be WP:De minimis. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dario Margeli Dentro Un Vortice Video.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Whpq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded for Dario Margeli. No other use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person who uploaded this file. The file no longer is needed on wikipedia because the article in which it was used was deleted. So go ahead and delete this image from wikipedia. I don't know how to do it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayumadehrafti (talk • contribs) 16:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EldonPortsmouth.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Waggers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an artist rendition of the building. Other versions found online. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - I think this one is blatant enough to be an WP:F9 speedy deletion case. Waggers TALK 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prithvi3 iitbracing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, most of low-res with no metadata. File:EVo22 iitbracing.jpg watermarked but claimed as own work. Doubtful own work claim. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evo3 iitb racing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, most of low-res with no metadata. File:EVo22 iitbracing.jpg watermarked but claimed as own work. Doubtful own work claim. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evo1 iitbracing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, most of low-res with no metadata. File:EVo22 iitbracing.jpg watermarked but claimed as own work. Doubtful own work claim. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vayu iitbracing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, most of low-res with no metadata. File:EVo22 iitbracing.jpg watermarked but claimed as own work. Doubtful own work claim. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orca iitbracing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of varying sizes, most of low-res with no metadata. File:EVo22 iitbracing.jpg watermarked but claimed as own work. Doubtful own work claim. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Republic of Korea, Assemblyman, Song Young Gil.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Larger file found elsewhere. Permission needed to verify ownership of image. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vimy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a temporary poster, so FoP wouldn't apply regardless of the country. Some elements, particularly the drawings of architecture, are likely above the threshold of originality. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if this is kept it needs to be renamed. It is highly misleading, since it isn't any Vimy photo itself. File:Return to Vimy Easter 2007 Tour England France Belgium poster.jpg or somesuch should be used -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the image appears to be located in Canada, considering the text about "Canadian students" celebrating "our history" of the "Canadian victory" -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.