Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 25[edit]

File:Mariah TEOM Digipak-Vinyl.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariah TEOM Digipak-Vinyl.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theknine2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image is secondary non-free image use in the inbox for some alternative releases of the album, and that to for digipak/vinyl editions which are likely to have sold less than mainstream copies. Additionally per WP:NFCC minimality is failed as is minimal use and low/moderate quality. The inclusion of this second cover art adds nothing to the article and its omission is not detrimental to the topic. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Usha Kiran.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usha Kiran.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mohammad Liyaqat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I'm pretty sure the background puts this image above the threshold of originality. That being the case, I don't believe it qualifies for fair use either. From what I could tell, the copyrighted background appears to be specific to a movie while the actual logo appears to be a simple wordmark (albeit with non-English characters) that could be easily recreated. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.