Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 July 12

< July 11	July 13 >

July 12[edit]

File:Gundam Daiba.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although the author has released the photo under a free license, freedom of panorama in Japan does not include commercial use so this image is not sufficiently freely licensed for Wikipedia. See c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan#Freedom of panorama. Whpq (talk) 00:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — enwiki follows US law, unlike commons which (in theory) follows both US and local law. (t · c) buidhe 11:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The United States also does not have freedom of panorama for 3D art, so that still remains a problem applying US copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the United States, see the Commons explanation. Stuff made before 1978 may be exempt, depending on if the object had a copyright notice. However, this is a sculpture of an anime character that was not introduced until 1979, according to our article on the character, meaning the sculpture is almost certainly after 1978. Use of this image wouldn't be free in either Japan or the US. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mcjesusfly.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, page creation suggests this is a WP:MADEUP image the uploader drew during class. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST, of no encyclopedic use. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused personal image -- Whpq (talk) 19:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bio sheet.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be spam for a non-notable band. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused image of a press release -- Whpq (talk) 19:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barkerbillstrickshooting.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of this orphaned image is a product's trade dress, which is likely copyrighted, so the PD-own-work is likely invalid. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Owned3189.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure exactly what this orphaned image is supposed to represent, although it may be a LEGO slavery reinaction. It's a white LEGO figure with a whip standing next to brown LEGO figures doing what appears to be agricultural work with the text "OWNED" in one corner. We don't need this. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cryptictext.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Primefac (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The PD-own-work copyright is invalid. As "funnyjunk.com" is imprinted in the lower right corner, it's obvious the uploader isn't the license holder. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as an unambiguous copyright violation and tagged as such. -- Whpq (talk) 19:14, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nelson 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Video game screenshot, PD-own-work claim is probably invalid. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Test pressure graph.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An unused graph that is meaningless without knowing the context behind what exactly is going on, which is not given. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment context is not difficult to find: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_flow_bench&oldid=40509328 ★ Bigr Tex 03:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thinkincopy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused selfie. Delete per WP:NOTSTORAGE. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Founderofcameronism.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, appears to be a school picture of the uploader. WP:NOTWEBHOST. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cornell-5-8-77-LP-cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#3a/WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is expanded to include an explicit and in-depth discussion of this version of the cover. -FASTILY 05:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very similar to standard cover, fails WP:NFCC#8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep That's the album cover for the LP version of Cornell 5/8/77. It has a different color scheme than the CD cover, so its overall appearance is quite different. — Mudwater^(Talk) 10:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mudwater, The fact that they are virtually identical except for palette swapping is exactly the reason to delete it. This is the same reason why we don't have seven covers at Zeitgeist (The Smashing Pumpkins album). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One is the cover for the CD, and the other is the cover for the LP. So, that's different than the Zeitgeist covers. And, far from being virtually identical, they look quite different from each other. — Mudwater^(Talk) 10:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The covers are sufficiently similar that the purpose of visual identification can be served with just the one cover. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. -- Whpq (talk) 12:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southern Pacific 4459 1942.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo recently deleted as copyvio on commons and then uploaded here. MB 20:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: Is there a deletion discussion at Commons you can link to? The source of the image doesn't have license for the image I don't think, and it's too recent for the PD-old. It seems like the exact licensing would depend on date of publication and if there was a copyright notice, which I am unsure of. Hog Farm _Bacon 20:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is the deletion. MB 20:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not obviously PD, since it postdates 1925. Likely would fail NFCC if converted to fair use. When in doubt, throw it out to avoid copyright violations. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southern Pacific MT-5 4376.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File recently deleted at commons and uploaded here MB 21:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't know about the deletion discussion, but there is no sign of release under the license used at the source (which actually has a copyright notice) and the date is apparently the date of the engine's creation instead of the image's. ★ Bigr Tex 02:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.