Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 19

< August 18	August 20 >

August 19[edit]

File:Norman Ivison 1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: dated speedy – will be deleted if no evidence of permission czar 04:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 13:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quick Google search suggested this person might be notable in Christian cricles. Anyone want to do dig into this more deeply before the image is deleted? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Photo of possibly notable individual.http://www.bowlandmedia.com/#!about-us-/c1ezl Thincat (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RBH Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Summary says that it is copyrighted, but the copyright tag is GFDL/CC BY-SA. Uploader is a declared COI editor. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10000%! delete. Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Online} 11:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: Please note that it has been produced for CSD! Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Online} 12:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muhafiz Khan Mosque.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 04:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File is licensed as non-free, but it's not clear why since according to the source link provided it definitely seems old enough for some form of public domain. Is there some reason this needs to remain non-free? -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment UK photographer died 1934 so still copyright URAA date. Do we have a publication date? Thincat (talk) 08:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the file page and the source, it is dated to 1885. It is unclear from the source page whether this is the year of creation, publication, or both. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 21:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: File still in copyright, and other free use alternatives already on Commons. czar 04:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Australian Survivor 1 Cast.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 04:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file issues: Uploaded under fair use as a TV program screenshot (Template:Non-free television screenshot), however image appears to be a promotional photo rather than screenshot, and thus many not meet the requirements of the licence. Additionally, non-free use rationale is missing WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2. -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weddingparty.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Evidence of permission should be sent to WP:OTRS Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:01, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Movie poster, previously published, uploaded under own/self claim, which needs a clarification. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raj kummar Rao.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own work, but visible watermark attributing Voompla.com Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not own work. Reh man 09:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angelica Bengtsson, August 2015.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No evidence on Google translate or otherwise. If such is forthcoming, please ask for undeletion at WP:REFUND Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News photo, Anyone read Swedish(?) to check the permission claim? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mohammad Fazlul Azim.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 27#File:Mohammad_Fazlul_Azim.jpg

Given the user name I'm willing to assume good faith, but a fuller clarification about the sourcing would be appreciated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cloud backup interface.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screenshot, what license is the software? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change License to Non-free software screenshot per the software's TOS AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 11:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VMware Backup.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Software screenshot, What license is the software? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That looks to be Symantec Backup Exec, and not any VMware product. Both are proprietary, non-free software. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 11:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suriya in a pose 1956.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is the right license 1954+60 = 2014, so under my understanding this may be copyright expired in India. (but the expiry date post-dates URAA.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YP-YND.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use rationale doesn't mention either of the articles the file is used in (Rhodesia and Air Rhodesia Flight 827). Would seem to fail WP:NFCC#8 for both usages. Kelly ^hi! 10:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CNV00036.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 27#File:CNV00036.JPG

Delete - unused, low resolution. Clearer photos available at Commons:Category:Penshaw Monument. Kelly ^hi! 10:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons. Low resolution, but not bad quality. Reh man 09:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cf1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Better images of this landmark available in Commons:Category:Cross Fell. Kelly ^hi! 10:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Better images available. Reh man 09:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Offline} 18:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morrowind native.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, user image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apthorp1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Obsoleted by File:Fanny Craddock (Waltham Forest Heritage).jpg. Kelly ^hi! 11:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom.
Delete Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Offline} 18:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:User FscRupandehiLogo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file doesn't state where it comes from and who created it or whose is it. Secondly the license says it consists of parts of a logo whereas it looks like a complete logo. I feel it needs discussion Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Online} 11:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not PD-TEXTLOGO. Reh man 09:59, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lincoln High Bridge.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Higher-res files available at Commons:Category:High Bridge, Lincoln. Kelly ^hi! 13:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 09:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glory hole.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Other photos available at Commons:Category:High Bridge, Lincoln. Kelly ^hi! 13:52, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep/Move to Commons. There is no other image directly showing underneath the bridge. But yes, the image is bad quality. Reh man

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arromanches Monument to Allan Beckett.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in France. Kelly ^hi! 18:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twenty One Pilots cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 27#File:Twenty_One_Pilots_cover.jpg

Labeled as own work, image is an album cover. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 19:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if related article is deleted, else keep and fix license. Reh man 09:54, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Articles and books of Elena Rumyantseva.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, derivative. Kelly ^hi! 21:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 09:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Artisans, 2013.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 21:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused. Reh man 09:51, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ArtRooneyStatueHeinzFieldGateD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 for Art Rooney, where there is no critical commentary on the artwork. It's also used in Three Rivers Stadium with no rationale. Kelly ^hi! 21:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.