Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 22
April 22[edit]
File:Geocapromys brownii (Harvard University).JPG[edit]
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Geocapromys brownii (Harvard University).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Daderot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
.JPG&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2011+April+22%23File%3AGeocapromys+brownii+%28Harvard+University%29.JPG%5D%5D){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=history){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
A bit of a complex case. I was about to ask around whether museum rules would really restrict the copyright of this photo, but looking at File:Geocapromys brownii Harvard University small.jpg (on Commons), it appears this photo is by the museum (which is not mentioned here), and permission has been granted for a low-resolution version only. If this is so, I highly doubt this meets the non-free image use criteria. —innotata 01:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Theconversationprism.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Theconversationprism.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Large-resolution version of The Conversation Prism. File description page says, "Fair use, Creative Commons." It is tagged with {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but according to the source page it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. So this image can be used only in accordance with the Wikipedia non-free content policy. But it fails WP:NFCC#3a, since it is of high resolution. A low-resolution version, File:Prismtiny.jpg, is already available. —Bkell (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Theconversationprismfrench.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Theconversationprismfrench.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Theconversationprismjapanese.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Theconversationprismchinese.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
These are derivative works of The Conversation Prism (see the discussion above). They are tagged {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but the Conversation Prism page says the original image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. File:Theconversationprismjapanese.png specifically has a CC-BY-NC-3.0 icon in the lower right corner. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. So these images can be used only in accordance with the Wikipedia non-free content policy. But they are being used only in an image gallery, which is generally not an acceptable use of non-free images (see WP:NFG). —Bkell (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Prismearly1.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Prismearly1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Prismearly2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Prismearly3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:Prismearly4.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
These are described as "early concepts" of The Conversation Prism. No source is given for these images, but I assume they come from the creators of the Conversation Prism (see the discussion above). The Conversation Prism site says that it's licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License, and no evidence has been provided that the creators have licensed these images differently. "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. So these images can be used only in accordance with the Wikipedia non-free content policy. But they are being used only in an image gallery, which is generally not an acceptable use of non-free images (see WP:NFG). —Bkell (talk) 01:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Thetwitterverse.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thetwitterverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Twittermid.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stumptowner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
These are two resolutions of an image called "The Twitterverse." They have correct source and licensing information; no problem there. But the corresponding article (The Twitterverse) was deleted for lack of notability about a year ago (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Twitterverse), and the images seem to have been orphaned since then, so I don't think these images have encyclopedic value. —Bkell (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons someone may want to build an article at another wikipedia, wikibooks, etc, or include it in Twitter. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The-fishermen-band.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The-fishermen-band.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BILZ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused image of a band. The file description page is being used for an article about this band, apparently written by a member of the band (the edit summary says, "This is our Bio"). The band does not seem to meet the notability criteria for musicians and ensembles, so the article does not merit a move into mainspace. —Bkell (talk) 02:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Truthfulchristian.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Truthfulchristian.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jwissick (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Useless media file of a child.Off2riorob (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per listing; orphan undescribed personal image, low quality image, no in-scope usefulness evident. Infrogmation (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless the uploader can provide a reason we should keep it. Seems to lack an encyclopedic application. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Abhishek Gupta's Facebook Profile as on 22042011.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abhishek Gupta's Facebook Profile as on 22042011.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gupraabishek (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unnecessary non-free image, as we already have a screenshot that shows the layout of Facebook. Also, this image's resolution is unnecessarily high. Swarm X 20:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Yakdirt.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Yakdirt.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pepso2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image to illustrate appearance of comic strip that also has a PD image illustrating it. No reason given why a non-free image is needed; if additional illustrations are wanted, any of the comics printed before 1923 will be PD-US. Infrogmation (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:F8U-1 Windsor.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:F8U-1 Windsor.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HJ32 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Obsoleted by File:F8U-1 Thompson Trophy NAN10-56.jpg, which is of a greater resolution. Not eligible for WP:CSD#F8 because the crop on the latter image is slightly different. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:German grey rabbit.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:German grey rabbit.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ubuntu061896 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image has been so widely circulated on the internet, who knows who the original author and copyright holder are? However, it's almost certainly not the uploader. No source information given. Swarm X 21:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment according to this <link redacted> it came from a story in The Times of London in 2007. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neo139 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Has no fair use rationale, and the main subject is a living person (Jimmy Nicol), where the image is used. Should be deleted IMO. Diego Grez (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The QI Annual 2007.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The QI Annual 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ntnon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Contested semi-speedy. It was contested as the "series' books are discussed in the article"- yes, they are, but that does not mean that reader understanding is significantly increased by seeing a cover of one of the books. There is a general consensus that a single cover image on the article about the book adds significantly to reader understanding; however, this does not extend to other articles where the book is discussed automatically. J Milburn (talk) 23:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.