Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Featured and good topics in Wikipedia

This star symbolizes the featured topic candidates on Wikipedia.
GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.
A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles).

A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic.

This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured/good topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates.

Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured and good topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

The featured and good topics director, GamerPro64, or his delegates Aza24 and Bryan Rutherford, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived.

To contact the FTC director and delegates, please leave a message on the FTC talk page, or use the {{@FTC}} notification template elsewhere.

You may want to check previous archived nominations first:
Purge the cache to refresh this page

Featured content:

Good content:

Featured and good topic tools:

Nomination procedure[edit]

To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure.

Supporting and objecting[edit]

Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

  • To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
  • If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not.
  • If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored.
    • To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Featured topic nominations[edit]

Romanian record charts[edit]

Multiple record charts have been inaugurated in Romania since the 1990s. Founded in 1995, the radio airplay-based Romanian Top 100 was the country's national chart until 2012. Later in 2012, the Airplay 100 replaced the Romanian Top 100 as a national chart. Until its cancellation in November 2021, it measured the airplay of songs on radio stations and television channels throughout the country. As of July 2022, Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) is publishing a weekly airplay listing, while Media Forest and Billboard also issue different charts.

6 articles
Romanian record charts
Romanian Top 100 number ones
Media Forest most-broadcast songs (2009)
Airplay 100 number ones
Media Forest most-broadcast songs (2010s)
Media Forest most-broadcast songs (2020s)
Contributor(s): Cartoon network freak

All articles have been passed to FL, with the 2020s Media Forest listing being the most recent one. --Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Support: I'm not familiar enough with the landscape of Romanian record charts to feel sure that this has all the articles that it should, but it seems to have all the contents of the relevant category, all at GA or FL. Looks good to me! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1989 (Taylor Swift album) (1st supplementary nomination)[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/1989 (Taylor Swift album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

  1. This Love (Taylor Swift song)
11 articles
1989 (Taylor Swift album)
Taylor Swift 104 (18280268726) (cropped).jpg
"Welcome to New York"
"Blank Space"
"Out of the Woods"
"Shake It Off"
"Bad Blood"
"Wildest Dreams"
"This Love"
"New Romantics"
The 1989 World Tour

The topic was promoted in January 2021 but has since seen some changes: the newly promoted FA "Out of the Woods" and the newly created GA "This Love". Fortunately, the number of FAs still satisfy the requirements for an FT, so here's the second nomination to legalize the inclusion of two newly improved articles. Cheers, --Ippantekina (talk) 02:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Comments: On "Welcome to New York", IMDB is not considered a reliable source, and can only be used as an external link. On the "Live performances and other usage", the last three usages and not sourced at all. You either wikilink everything or you don't. If you just wikilink once, → Taylor Swift website, Vulture should be wikilink on reference 10 and not 12; Time should only be linked on source 19, remove from 20 and 21. Billboard wiki linked on 26. Clash is not wikilinked on 31. Overlink on 45, 46, 59 and 50. Not sure if Gothamist is a reliable source as it is a blog. On "New Romantics" everything is overlinked and needs to be concise. Billboard (15, 16 and 19), Rolling Stone (5, 40, 41 and 42), Slate (6), The Hollywood Reporter (29), The Washington Post (47), → Taylor Swift website. Same problems on "This Love". On "Wildest Dreams" Headline Planet is an unrelibale source, source needs to be appropriately formated per Wikipedia:Singles criteria, reference 52 not properly formated, Idolator is now publisher and the article suffers from the same link problem as the others. On "Out of the Woods" MTV News is the publisher, not sure why there is no release history table, and Radio Airplay SSL needs to be properly formated as I affirmed above. Here you have Republic Playbook, on other articles is Republic Records, consistency. Overlink problem on Billboard, MTV News, Rolling Stone, Stuff, Vulture and others. For every article so far, Vulture always needs url-access=limited. This is just the first batch of comments, once fixed I will go for the other articles. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comments Second batch: On "Style" clash magazine not wikilink, some problem with Elle UK wiklink and medium is not a reliable source. However, you can find that information on the grammy website, medium is a mirror website. On "Bad Blood" the same problem with medium and headline planet. PopSugar is a blog and the writer seems to also have written for Newsweek, which is not a reliable source. wikilink Billboard, The Edge. Reference 76, consequence is missing wikilink and author. Wikilink on 79. The year-end sources are messy in regards to work/publishers, "Billboard/" and others. On the tour article, what is a "TBA" publisher? The tour setlsit from genius is not reliable, PopCrush and Headline Planet are not reliable sources. Wikilink The Washington Post, Billboard and Taste of Country. If you could find an archive source for the dead link it would be nice. There will be a third batch. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    A small comment--the story was published on Medium before translated onto the Recording Academy's site, so Medium in this case is a platform and is reliable. Ippantekina (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Medium is not reliable, please see WP:RSP. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I know. In this case it's like Facebook; the Recording Academy used it as a platform. If you look at the published dates, the Recording Academy article (Feb 17) was published after the Cuepoint article (Feb 13), same author (Paul Zollo). Ippantekina (talk) 10:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    It is still an unreliable source, Zollo also published it on American Songwriter. Just replace it with the Recording Academy article. Not sure why are you "fighting" to keep a source deemed unreliable. Nvertheless, there are still more issues that need to be addressed besides that one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I can replace it, but in this case it is reliable (per WP:ABOUTSELF). Other than that, the MTV News issue is similar to my comment regarding italicizing digital websites like BBC. I have removed such sources as Daily Beast and re-formatted refs on other articles. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 10:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    WP: Avoutself states: "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves", how does something related to the album even applies here? I would understand if it was Taylor Swift website. The article has nothing to do with medium activities. I'm confused. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    It says "This policy also applies to material published by the subject on social networking websites". The Medium source is a platform where the producers talked about the album. Ippantekina (talk) 02:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    No, the producers talked about to Paul Zollo, which was reporting it to the Grammys (or something in this vein). The content was also published at America Songwriter, henceforth I said Paul Zollo. Medium, just copied it and mirror it. All in all, my point still stands. I'm not sure what are you trying to do here, as is clear an unreliable source per WP:RSP. There is no argument, on top of that it is a blog. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Ippantekina and MarioSoulTruthFan: I have started an RfC to determine the reliability of Cuepoint for future instances where this might arise. Your participation (and that of anyone else reading this) is welcome. --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thanks TheSandDoctor, I will participate in the RfC some time later. Pinging @MarioSoulTruthFan: how can Cuepoint "copy" the content of the Recording Academy when the published date on Cuepoint (12 Feb 2016) is before that on the Academy's site (17 Feb 2016)? Ippantekina (talk) 02:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    You noticed that on medium it says on the top of the article "The Grammys", right? Do you also know that the grammys always publish those kind of stories written by Zolo, while medium does not. It happened with Adele, Bruno Mars and so on and so forth. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, the Grammys publish it, using Cuepoint as a platform. That's not a "mirror site". Ippantekina (talk) 09:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    They publish it on their own website, they don't use cuepoint as a platform. I never saw any article anywhere being published twice in different website, without credit being given to the original publisher. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Unless you could explain why the Cuepoint article was published before the publish date on the Recording Academy's site, I stand my ground. Ippantekina (talk) 03:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The date could be wrong, this kind of stories are always published on the grammys website ad its always the same author. On top of that, unreliable source. I stand my ground on this one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    There is no consensus that this source is unreliable; you yourself voted in the RfC that it requires additional considerations. You can't fake a publish date online or if there is actually an error, the margin is not as astounding as a five-day gap. But regardless, if that cannot convice you, let's leave it at that. Ippantekina (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Indeed I said that. Henceforth, maybe you can have both sources? The grammy's and the medium one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Third batch: On "Blank Space", Medium is not a reliable source. However, you can find that information on the grammy website, medium is a mirror website. → NPR, find an archive of the dead links. On "Shake it Off", The Daily Beast is an unreliable source, find an archive of the dead links. On the album article, "1989 digital releases worldwide" → no album can be released worldwide, so "1989 digital releases in various countries:"; source 121 has no website, author. Ref 180 and 187 are missing wikilink.
Hello, I'll be addressing your comments within a few days. Some replies--
  • At MOS:TITLE#Notes: "Do not abuse incorrect template parameters (e.g. by putting the work title in |publisher= or |via=" in an attempt to avoid italicizing digital sources" which applies to "BBC News" (that's not a publisher)
  • I was advised somewhere that "" is the correct input for work and not "Taylor Swift website"--and I don't see how "" should be a problem unless you're being nitpick-y.
  • Not sure which overlink problem you are referring to? Because at WP:DUPLINK: "Citations stand alone in their usage, so there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article; e.g. |work=The Guardian". If there are references missing the hyperlink, I'd add the links to all instead of removing some.
  • If the release history is detailed in prose, I do not see a point in creating a table; it's not like chart positions where some positions can be trivial to be written out in prose. Ippantekina (talk) 05:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Other issues such as Republic Records/Playbook inconsistency and Vulture accessibility have been addressed. Ippantekina (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    That's what I mean with "You either wikilink everything or you don't", consistency is key here. Kind of "nitpick-y", but I won't fight you on that. Regarding the release history, if you only have one date you don't need it. However, if you do have several dates for release's easier to understand the table, it's not like the article only have one release date, they have several. "Out of the Woods" has three release dates, including a promotional one. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello, I have addressed your issues with sourcing. I have replied regarding your concerns with Medium. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good topic nominations[edit]

Characters of Final Fantasy VIII[edit]

Final Fantasy VIII is a role-playing video game released for the PlayStation in 1999 and Windows-based personal computers in 2000. The game became available on PlayStation Network as a PSone Classics title in 2009. It was developed and published by Square (now Square Enix) as the Final Fantasy series' eighth title. The game follows the story of a group of mercenaries, who are part of an organization named "SeeD". Their main goal in the game is to stop a sorceress from the future (named Ultimecia) from compressing time. The music was scored by Nobuo Uematsu, series regular, and in a series first, the theme music is a vocal piece, "Eyes on Me", performed by Faye Wong. Thirteen weeks after its release, Final Fantasy VIII had earned more than US$50 million in sales, making it the fastest-selling Final Fantasy title of all time until Final Fantasy XIII, a multi-platform release. The game had shipped 8.15 million copies worldwide by March 31, 2003.

5 articles
Characters of Final Fantasy VIII
FF project logo.svg
Squall Leonhart
Rinoa Heartilly
Selphie Tilmitt
Edea Kramer

This is a procedural nomination after the delisting of Final Fantasy VIII as a good topic. I noted that as it was only one article that was unsuitable, the characters-based articles could form a suitable good topic. If anyone wants to improve the text intro to focus more on the characters rather than the video game itself, please do so. — Bilorv (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Late Registration[edit]

Late Registration is the second studio album by American rapper Kanye West, released on August 30, 2005. The album saw West venture into an elaborate and orchestral style, which brought him widespread critical success. West was also successfully commercial with the album, reaching number one on the US Billboard 200 and releasing multiple hit singles, including the smash hit "Gold Digger".

8 articles
Late Registration
Kanye West in Portland.jpg
"Heard 'Em Say"
"Touch the Sky"
"Gold Digger"
"Drive Slow"
"Hey Mama"
"Diamonds from Sierra Leone"
Touch the Sky Tour
Contributor(s): K. Peake, Bruce Campbell

I have worked very hard on these articles for the past few years, which began to see early results when "Touch the Sky" became a GA in December 2019 and I scored my most recent one with "Heard 'Em Say" in June 2022! Late Registration achieved this status before I was even an editor on here, however I tried to bring it to FA earlier in 2022 with extensive work but to no avail, though the album is of significant importance to potentially become a FA. Update: I have now created an article for the Touch the Sky Tour and I have managed to expand it enough to become a GAN, which I can see it passing easily and I hope the managers are alright if I make this part of the GT since it hasn't been promoted yet. --K. Peake 11:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Oppose Neutral: I hate to be a downer, but it's typical for an album topic to include any supporting tours and live albums associated with the studio album, which, in this case, would mean Late Orchestration and, at some point, an article about the Touch the Sky Tour, once someone writes one. No disrespect to your work on all these articles! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Bryanrutherford0 The Touch The Sky Tour was not notable enough to have its own article created and is mentioned in the main article anyway. Also, Late Orchestration was released as late as 2006 and features songs from The College Dropout too. Therefore, these are not needed for the GT. I have created an article for the tour now and it is in the process of expansion; if this passes at GAN, will you support the GT? --K. Peake 21:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • That goes a long way toward addressing my concerns! I'm not sure I can support without the live album (it's even named after this studio album), but I can probably go neutral. Great job doing the work to solve the problem! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I'll think more about the live album in the future, which will lead to probable further discussion with you on this topic. K. Peake 13:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comments: Amazing work on all these articles, including "Gone" and "Hey Mama" where you provided sources that make said articles pass WP:NSongs. On "Hey Mama" after the sources you have this written there "The year of 2000 Kanye produced this song and enlisted Naki the Beatman producer 107.5 radio personality who brought Kanye Mysta Jay for vocals. Naki's vocal mate of r&b group Precyyse." → remove. On "Drive Slow" one archive error on source 33. Reference 16 shouldn't be Slant Magazine? In several articles, such as "Touch the Sky", you use "Vulture", always url-access=limited. DJ Booth is not a reliable source, according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. On "Heard 'Em Say" can you replace sources 113 and 117? References 65, 66 and 68 are duplicated from the chart table. Source 77 is missing the author. I will add more later. On "Diamonds from Sierra Leone" amazon is referenced in one source but not on the other (22, 23 and 109), also not sure about the reliability of MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan I have done all of your points, apart from the replacement of sources 113 and 117 because the GA criteria says dead links are allowed, removal of refs 65 and 68 since these are using a refname cited from the table so are not duplicates while ref 66 is needed separately for the specific chart issue and ref 77 already cites the author so you must've missed something. --K. Peake 09:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The article I wanted to mention with those sources was "Touch the Sky", really sorry about it. On "Gold Digger" source 37 has both work and publisher, stick to one, and is Playlouder a reliable source?MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I made those fixes for the song article now apart from the ref 77 one, as there is no author for that source. Also, ref 37 does not have any publisher and Playlouder is reliable due to having partnered with Glastonbury. --K. Peake 07:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I meant 76, Idolator Staff. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 02:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan Staff are not supposed to cited under this parameter, as they do fit in the authors category. Also, I've made all of the other fixes apart from where noted. --K. Peake 06:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Regarding the album sources it is flawless, congrats! I just want to know if "The Ringer", seems to be a good source for sports, is it good for music? I'm not sure, that's why I'm asking. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan There is an entire section on music just like sports, so that shows it'll be reliable for both. --K. Peake 15:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    So I wanted to support this nomination. However, I can't as Bryan Rutherford made a good point. There is missing the tour article and I found some sources to create said article and with a few more researches you can get more info and make it a GA. This is what I found with a quick search. To be honest, fantastic job on everything else!
    Best wishes, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello, thanks for showing the sources that would provide notability for the tour. However, I will obviously have to create the article, then nominate it successfully for GA status. Because of this, should this candidacy remain open if I begin work or close since the article will be completely missing until the latest scenario? K. Peake 11:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    You welcome. I'm not sure, it's better ask the coordinators. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan I have now created an article for the tour using the sources you pointed towards and a few more, which is in the process of expansion and should be nominated by me soon enough; I have left a message for the coordinators that they will likely see shortly. --K. Peake 06:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Good job so far! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan I have now nominated the tour for GA; will you be willing to review it or merely come back to this topic if the review passes to comment or voice support? --K. Peake 11:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Hi! I won't be reviewing the article since I'm a bit tired from the GA backlog, hopefully, you understand. Yes, I will come back to this topic once you add the tour, just let me know. Nevertheless, I'm still on the fence regarding the Late Orchestration live album, as it shares songs from both albums. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Bryanrutherford0 and MarioSoulTruthFan, the Touch the Sky Tour has now been promoted to GA status and regarding Late Orchestration, not only does it feature music from both albums but the bear theme is frequent throughout West's 2004-07 work. Not only does this make it merely consist with his work rather than only LR, the live album was also released as late as 2006 so hardly accompanied the studio one. Support now or any other comments? --K. Peake 10:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • As far as the timing goes, the live performance of which Late Orchestration is a recording was given three weeks after the public release of Late Registration, so, the timing rather tends to support my view that the live performance was indeed given in support of the newly released album. I'm neutral on the proposal without it. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2019–20 snooker season[edit]

The professional events played during the 2019–20 snooker season

31 articles
2019–20 snooker season
Riga Masters
International Championship
China Championship
English Open
World Open
Northern Ireland Open
UK Championship
Scottish Open
European Masters
German Masters
World Grand Prix
Welsh Open
Snooker Shoot Out
Players Championship
Gibraltar Open
Tour Championship
World Snooker Championship
2019 World Cup (snooker)
Paul Hunter Classic
Six-Red World Championship
Shanghai Masters
Champion of Champions
The Masters
2019–20 Championship League
2020 Championship League
2019–20 Challenge Tour
2019 Q School
2019 in cue sports
2020 in cue sports
Snooker world rankings 2019/2020
Contributor(s): Lee Vilenski

All of the professional events that make up the season are here. There is also additional articles such as the main one, the rankings and X in cue sport lists (which can be removed if not suitable) Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC) --Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment – Just as a heads up, you have three dab links in the table: 2020 Championship League, 2020 European Masters and 2020 World Grand Prix. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 13:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for that. Changed Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Topic removal candidates[edit]

Mary Wollstonecraft[edit]

9 articles
Mary Wollstonecraft
Mary Wollstonecraft by John Opie (c. 1797).jpg
Thoughts on the Education of Daughters
Mary: A Fiction
Original Stories from Real Life
A Vindication of the Rights of Men
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark
Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman

Thoughts on the Education of Daughters was demoted on 5 March 2022, and there is no effort to change that, and without it the topic fails criterion 3.b. (Original Stories from Real Life was also recently delisted.) Armbrust The Homunculus 18:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CMLL World Lightweight Champions[edit]

8 articles
CMLL World Lightweight Champions
Dragon Lee II.jpg
Ricky Marvin
Rocky Romero
Máscara Dorada
Dragon Lee
Master Wato

Fails criterion 3.b as Stigma (luchador) is not a WP:GA, isn't being worked on, and is past the three month grace period (he won the title on 15 March). Armbrust The Homunculus 17:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]