Wikipedia:Elsevier ScienceDirect/Approved

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Approved accounts[edit]

Health & Life Sciences[edit]

  1. Shyamal (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work mainly on biology topics and help others at WP:RX. Shyamal (talk) 06:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Shyamal: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Maky (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an active editor writing mostly in Wikipedia:WikiProject Primates, and particularly about strepsirrhines. My writings fall under "Health & Life Sciences". I have over 25 FAs to my name, and ScienceDirect is one of the biggest pay walls I encounter when doing my research. I can't stress how helpful this resource would be to me. – Maky « talk » 03:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Maky: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jfdwolff (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been a contributor to health content since 2004, with 6 featured articles and 24 good articles relevant to medicine. I am vice-chair of the WikiProject Med Foundation. Journal access would greatly improve my work in developing verifiable content in the area of internal medicine (particularly the emergencies). I imagine it is in the Publisher's interest to support the use of its publications as sources on Wikipedia. JFW | T@lk 07:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Jfdwolff: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Graham Beards (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I have been active on Wikipedia for nearly eight years. I contribute mainly to virology articles (four FAs). I am a Featured Article Coordinator on the English Wikipedia. Access to Health and Life Sciences would be helpful to my virology articles and for fact checking others. Graham Beards (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Graham Beards: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. kashmiri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I manage a patient organisation in one of orphan diseases and share a lot of research knowledge here on Wikipedia for the benefit of other patients. As our organisation is involved in research, I have edited numerous medicine-related articles, primarily in the area of neuromuscular disorders, both on en-wiki and (much less) pl-wiki. Access to ScienceDirect in Health and Life Sciences would help me to further update Wikipedia with medicine's new discoveries – properly sourced. Regards, kashmiri TALK 21:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Kashmiri: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sarahj2107 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): This would be very helpful for creating, expanding and copyediting science articles. There have been many times I have seen a journal article on Elsevier that would have helped my work here, but was unable to access the full article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending @Sarahj2107: You're waitlisted for the Health & Life Sciences resource. I'll contact you if we get more accounts. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Sarahj2107: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Justlettersandnumbers (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an active creator of articles/content on domestic animal breeds, and access to the Health and Life Sciences stream would be very helpful to me. However, I feel that priority for this stream should probably mostly be given to medical editors. I don't have alumnus access to ScienceDirect. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending @Justlettersandnumbers: You're waitlisted for the Health & Life Sciences resource. I'll contact you if we get more accounts. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Justlettersandnumbers: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. MeegsC (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been on English Wikipedia since 2007, working mostly in the biological sciences — primarily with various bird articles. FA articles are flight feather and pelican (the latter a group effort), GA articles are red warbler, red-throated loon and black catbird. I've also written most of beak and bird nest. Lately, I've been spending many hours working my way through the massive backlog of articles in the WP:BIRD cleanup listing; access to Elsevier's journals would definitely help with that task, as many of these contain {{cn}} tags. Please note that I already have a JSTOR account, if that affects my chances here. I'm most interested in the "Health and Life Sciences" stream. MeegsC (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending @MeegsC: You're waitlisted for the Health & Life Sciences resource. I'll contact you if we get more accounts. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @MeegsC: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. RexxS (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): I'm a long-term contributor to scuba-related articles with an FA and 3 GAs in the area of hyperbaric medicine. I'm an active member of WikiProject Medicine and a founder member and director of WikiProject Med Foundation. Access to the "Health and Life Sciences" stream would be very helpful in being able to read full articles, rather than just abstracts and summaries. --RexxS (talk) 12:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
     Pending @RexxS: You're waitlisted for the Health & Life Sciences resource. I'll contact you if we get more accounts. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @RexxS: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jacek555 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work on biology (zoology) topics at pl:wiki, mainly with rodents articles. Among them many FA: Koszatniczka (O. degus), Świstak tatrzański (Marmota marmota), Bóbr europejski (beaver), Chomik europejski (european hamster), but also Diugoń (Dugong Dugon), and many GA. During my work I need many articles published by Elsevier. So I would like to use the „Health & Life Sciences” stream. Jacek555 (talk) 07:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Jacek555: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Testem (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I've been editing for some years now and make many edits to articles pertaining to Designer drugs. Where there are resources on these they tend to mainly be published in scientific journals carried by sciencedirect. Testem (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Testem: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Wiki CRUK John (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) (also Johnbod (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - over 135000 edits, several FAs) Applying for Health & Life Sciences content. Rather amazingly, despite working as Wikipedian in Residence at Cancer Research UK, it is actually rather tricky for me to access Elsevier medical material, which I often use. I will also lose any CRUK access from mid-February when my term ends. I have done a lot of work on health articles, mainly related to cancer, and intend to keep editing in this area. For example Pancreatic cancer is currently at FAC. Wiki CRUK John (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Wiki CRUK John: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Sasata (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an active contributor of mycology articles (60 FAs, 250+ GAs)), and do not have access to Elsevier journal content. A Health & Life Sciences account would be extremely useful for the work I do here. Sasata (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Sasata: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Partynia (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I´m an editor with more than 23.000 edits. As an active member of the german WikiProject Medicine I´m active in medicine and dentistry and as a sysop in de-WP. I'm most interested in the "Health and Life Sciences" stream will be helpful for my contributions. --Partynia (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Partynia: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kenraiz (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Too low number of accounts, esp. in Health & Life Sciences! I submit to this stream just to show how necessary and useful is their increasing. My account is active since 2006 (45500 edits). I write articles about plant species in Polish Wiki (nearly 50 FA i GA e.g.: Padus serotina, Urtica dioica, Juniperus communis). Kenraiz (talk) 11:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Kenraiz: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andreas Werle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Physician, Admin in de-WP, > 20k-Edits, some GA and FAs. Active in german Wiki-Project Medicine since 2005, interested in "Health and Life Sciences" stream. -- Andreas Werle (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Andreas Werle: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Did not complete registration. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Atsme (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit, expand and create articles in the field of Biology, Conservation biology, Medicine, and Science. I have collaborated in either the creation or expansion of 5 GAs, and 1 FA - American paddlefish. Access to such a valuable resource would cut the time spent on each article in half which would increase my productivity. I appreciate the opportunity of being considered as a candidate. Thank you. Atsme☯Consult 20:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Atsme: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Everymorning (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit lots of science and medicine-related articles, so this would be useful in accessing more information than can be obtained solely from the abstracts of scientific papers. Since I am especially active in medicine I think the Health & Life Sciences would be most beneficial to me. Everymorning talk 00:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Everymorning: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Դավիթ Սարոյան (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor since 2009 over 8000 edits and 500 articles created, I edit biology and biology-related articles in hywiki. I'm a junior researcher at Molecular Biology Institute of RA, molecular biologist researching in the field of virology. I will use Elsevier to improve biology articles in Armenian wiki as well as in my academic study as there's no any institution around me, which provides access to Elsevier.--Դավիթ Սարոյան (talk) 10:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Դավիթ Սարոյան: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ozzie10aaaa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I believe I have the required edits and subject matter, Health and Life Sciences would be very useful for articles in Wikipedia as I currently do 1. "Ebola Virus Epidemic in West Africa" ( one of the most viewed articles), I also am contributing to 2. "Dyslexia". thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Ozzie10aaaa: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Redlinux (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) sorry to be pretty late. Access to Elsevier ScienceDirect (Health & Life Sciences) would be very helpful for the work in de-wiki [1], so I ask You to give me one of the accounts (Health & Life Sciences). Greetings Redlinux···→ 22:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Redlinux: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Amqui (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit in many different fields including chemistry and biology. As such, I'd be interested in having access to the "Physical Sciences" package, but access to the "Health & Life Sciences" package would also be useful as a second choice if first one isn't available. My main project is French Wikipedia, but I can read technical English as I work in engineering in English. I usually try to add sources on English Wikipedia articles on the articles that I develop on French Wikipedia. I have wrote a dozen Good Articles on French Wikipedia. Thanks, Amqui (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Amqui: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Formerly 98 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've made about 4200 edits to English Wikipedia this year, almost entirely to medical articles. I've mostly rewritten the Quinolone, Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Pharmaceutical industry articles (partly under a previous username Alfred Bertheim), and have made major contributions to most of the antipsychotic and SSRI related articles. It would be good to have access to more journals in the health area as I am mostly reliant on the 10% or so of articles that are free. Formerly 98 (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Formerly 98: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sternrenette (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like to apply for access to Elsevier ScienceDirect (Health & Life Sciences) which would be very helpful for my work in de-wiki. My focus for articles is on botany, pomology and medicine/veterinary medicine. Kind regards, --Sternrenette (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Sternrenette: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Maralia (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I edit a lot of medical articles, primarily about diseases and disorders, and could really use access to more medical journals. Most of the editors that I used to pester for excerpts are no longer active here, so it's been difficult to access good sources. Maralia (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Maralia: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step.
  26. Melly42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I primarily edit articles related to zoology. Therefor I am interested in publications like Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology, Quaternary Research, and Ecology and Biological Conservation --Melly42 (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Melly42: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Guettarda (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I primarily edit articles related to ecology, plants, environmental issues and the Caribbean. I am requesting a Health & Life Sciences account. Guettarda (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Guettarda: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Paulscrawl (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active over 11 years, RefDesk regular, Reviewer, Research Coordinator for Wikipedia Library and already approved for Cochrane and BMJ access, both excellent for Evidence Based Medicine. Currently editing Cochrane Collaboration and, soon, unbiased History sections of related EBM articles. Elsevier Health Sciences would help balance former (often primary) sources and might help provide requested countervailing views to what some perceive as EBM orthodoxy, per others' comments on EBM Talk page. Would also share access as needed via Resource Exchange. Thanks again. -- Paulscrawl (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Paulscrawl: Approved Of course. Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. MBq (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) started in 2004, MD, PhD, member of de:WP:RM, our equivalent of Wikiproject Medicine. I'd like to apply für access to Health & Life Sciences content. Best, --MBq (talk) 08:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @MBq: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like access to the Health and Life Sciences on ScienceDirect. I mainly edit articles on natural history, both topics such as camouflage and groups of organisms such as insects, many of which I have brought to Good Article status. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chiswick Chap: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Chhandama (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have created and improved full-length articles on history of science, biology, medicine and drug discovery. ScienceDirect has a huge collection of otherwise inaccessible information. I may be of greater service to Wikipedia if I could access the Health and Life Sciences section. Chhandama (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chhandama: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Health and Life Sciences. I edit medical articles.
    @Anthonyhcole: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Matthew Ferguson (talk). Normally if I want such a paywalled source bad enough I would request it on a wp forum, with mixed success. This access would be very useful for me and likely I would utilize it on a near daily basis. I mostly improve and generate content around the topics of dentistry, oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial pathology (the only active editor in this field as far as I'm aware).
    @Matthew Ferguson 57: Which of the three resources are you requesting access to? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: Health & Life Sciences sounds most relevant for me, although Social & Behavioral Sciences would be nice too, I feel another editor may benefit and utilize the latter more than me. Kind regards, Matthew Ferguson (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Matthew Ferguson: ApprovedExpect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. MrBill3 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor in WP Proj Med, 30,000 edits, active 4 years. Extensive work in ref verification. Seeking Health and Life Sciences access. Thanks. - - MrBill3 (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @MrBill3: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Timetraveler3.14 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I tend to do expanding, updating, and verifying in physics, pharmacology, and medicine. I like to make sure statements based on older citations are still valid once more timely review articles are available. I also enjoy creating content on new molecules once they've advanced enough to be given drug names and not just codes. Access to Health & Life Sciences would be most useful. Thanks. Timetraveler3.14 (talk) 14:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Timetraveler3.14: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Dcs002 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) (I just noticed - I misspelled my own username. I just corrected it now.) I would like a Health and Life Sciences account. I have been active in fits and starts in current events, music, and for a few months last year I was pretty active in AfD discussions, of any sort. I have spent more time working out issues in disputes than building articles. But I have also made some contributions to articles with academic, medical, and neuroscientific content. I have shied away from editing biomedical topics because I no longer have journal access since I left academia a few years back, and I just don't feel comfortable citing PubMed abstracts the way people do. I have specific training in interpreting academic research in the biosciences that others might not have, having done real neuroscience research myself and earning a PhD. Thanks for considering me! Dcs002 (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dcs002: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    TLSuda, Step 3 (Waiting for partners to activate accounts) says that, after I register online with Google, it can take as long as 2 weeks to get the email with my account information. It's been 2 weeks, and I've been watching my email and checking my junk mail folder. Should I be concerned? Dcs002 (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JustBerry (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like a Health and Life Sciences account (on Science Direct). I am currently a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer on the English Wikipedia and steward on the Beta Wikipedia. Intended to be used for bio medical articles. --JustBerry (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @JustBerry: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: Thank you. I have replied to the email with clarification questions. --JustBerry (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. CielProfond (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Mostly interested in astronomy, I’d like access to resources related to that subject. I’m an amateur astronomer, but involved in a few local organizations, and sometimes doing talks at local astronomy clubs, including one in a few days about ancient astronomical instruments — I made a brass planispheric astrolabe.
    @CielProfond: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Kevin Gorman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Though I'd love access to them all, the life/health science collection would be significantly useful in helping to create/edit/verify information on enwp per WP:MEDRS and is thus what I request access to. Unfortunately, I have no current academic affiliation to arrange access. Best, Kevin Gorman (talk) 00:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kevin Gorman: ApprovedExpect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. TnoXX (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) The main focus of my work in Ukrainian Wiki is neuroscientific articles. Unfortunately, I have no access to ScienceDirect, where I can find a lot of useful articles. I would like to have access to Health&Life Sciences. I have been active for 3 years and I'm not planning to stop writing here. Thank you!--TnoXX (talk) 19:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TnoXX: ApprovedExpect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I help out at the Resource Exchange and come across a lot of journal articles that can be found on Elsevier. I would like access to the Health Sciences collection. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @MrLinkinPark333: ApprovedExpect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. OppidumNissenae (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am active in 2010 with many medical pages created. This is my: Edit-count and this my production. I often quote Elsevier papers. I was in 2013 one of the Top non English medical editors 2013 and Top medical editors 2014 (all).Tanks--OppidumNissenae (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @OppidumNissenae: Which of the three resources are you requesting access to? I also see you haven't been active on Wikipedia in the past two weeks. Is this just temporary? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @OppidumNissenae: Its been a few months, are you interested in this resource? TLSuda (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Of coure, but they are still not very active because convalescing.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @OppidumNissenae: Which of the three resources are you interested? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Health & Life Sciences, I'm a biologist, tanks.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 18:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ganímedes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I create near 400 articles of species, but it´s quite complicated find information to expand them online. I'm here since 2009 and get more than 62.000 edits. Health & Life Sciences could be really usefull to improve articles in biology. Thanks. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ganímedes: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Wie146 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a regular contributor and editor in WPID (and also contributor in Commons), especially on species diversity and ecology related subject, since 2006. I hope access to Health & Life Sciences will improve my understanding and contributions in biodiversity articles. Thanks for your kind attention.Wie146 (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Wie146: Approved Expect an email from me shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Helixitta (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Hello, I would like to request access to Health & Life Sciences resources. I'm an active contributor in Ukrainian bio project, having written two good and two featured articles. (Unfortunately, our scientific institution is no longer subscribed to ScienceDirect). Thank you. --Helixitta (talk @ ukWiki) 14:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Helixitta: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: hello. I haven't been mailed after filling in the form in March. 2 weeks have passed, so I have a question: should I fill in the same form you mailed me again or maybe should I ask for a new form? Thank you. --Helixitta (t.) 17:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Your form response was received and submitted to Elsevier last week, so we're just waiting on them to create a login for you - if you haven't received anything by the end of the week let me know and I will follow up with them. 17:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
    Fix ping: @Helixitta: Nikkimaria (talk) 17:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ozzie10aaaa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I was approved last year for an account[2] (I believe it only lasts 1 year, though I still seem to have access?) during the year I have contributed to west Africa /EbolaWest_African_Ebola_virus_epidemic , took Dyslexia to GA status and have 16,000+ edits . Therefore I could put Health and Life Sciences to good use, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ozzie10aaaa: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Giantflightlessbirds (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm interested in access to Life Sciences journals; I currently actively work on species pages, run Wikipedia edit-a-thons, and collaborate with the Department of Conservation on improving Wikipedia pages for endangered species. Unfortunately, I am at an institution in provincial New Zealand with no journal subscriptions; nor does the local public library have access. Elsevier journals would be extremely useful. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 08:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Giantflightlessbirds: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Meloe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Sciencedirect would be a main source for content in topics I´m interested in, mainly biological themes. I'm editing in this area since 2010 in dewiki.--Meloe (talk) 10:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Meloe: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mikael Häggström (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like access to Elsevier Health & Life Sciences. I was 88th in 2014 and 134th in 2015 of users with most edit counts in medical articles. The hospital where I currently work does not provide journal access, so access to ScienceDirect is critical for me in order to scrutinize what's beyond the abstracts of articles.
    @Mikael Häggström: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Dcirovic (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been involved with several Wikipedia projects since 2010, the outcome of which are numerous articles and over 2.7 M edits. My contributions are primarily concerned with chemistry and biology. I would be grateful to you, if you could grant me library access to the Health & Life Sciences collection, please. Thanks. --Dcirovic (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dcirovic: Approved for Health & Life Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Zezen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Applied psychology, arcane history, environmental sciences, mostly in English, with some in Polish and other languages, are the WP subjects that tickle my editorial fancy. Sometimes I lack "hard-core" sources to substantiate my left-field edits that I source from public access materials. Elsevier's DBs would help me in ameliorating such past revisions and contribute to future articles. Ta. Zezen (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zezen: Which of the three streams are you requesting? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for querying, @Nikkimaria: and managing this process. This access collection: Health & Life Sciences, please, as colhealthlife.xls list seems to be the longest. Zezen (talk) 03:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Zezen: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Dear Nikkimaria : Thank you for the speedy processing of my requests. I have logged into the new Elsevier account and I enjoy its tools and content, easily accessible thanks to their effective search engine. Kudos! Zezen (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social & Behavioral Sciences[edit]

  1. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active in updating articles on human intelligence and genetics and note that many of those articles cite journals published by Elsevier, which I would like to take care to verify and cite with full templates linking to accurate bibliographic information for each article. I am just beginning to use individual Wikipedia Library accounts to access sources after formerly using remote online library access through a Wikipedian in Residence project that has now wrapped up my phase of participation. I will of course be very happy to follow all of Elsevier's requirements for how this resource is to be used and attributed by Wikipedians. I have brought one article to good article status and would like to bring up several more Wikipedia articles to good article or featured article status, and access to Elsevier sources will help greatly for that task in articles on the topics I edit most. Thanks for the resource opportunity. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    While waiting for the account review process to proceed, I have updated a user bibliography of sources for editing articles on human intelligence and a user bibliography of sources for editing articles on human genetics and anthropology with the appropriate templates for ScienceDirect articles I was able to verify through my previous access. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 00:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @WeijiBaikeBianji: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Volunteer Marek (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit numerous articles relating to economics and ScienceDirect does include a large number of relevant, top economic journals [3] (hence I'd be interested in one of the Social & Behavioral Sciences accounts). I've been on en-Wikipedia since 2005, I have over 48,000 edits, I've created over 1000 articles (including more than 100 DYKs), and several GAs.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Volunteer Marek: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Masssly (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I am fully active active on English Wikipedia and spend my time patrolling new pages, checking/improving references and fighting vandalism. Also I take particular interest in the activities of Wikimedia research committee, I am a researcher myself and my interests are on the impact of WP in academia. I could really use this resource. Best Regards.—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 09:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Masssly: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vitalie Ciubotaru (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Registered wikipedia user since March 2008; over 3000 edits in Romanian Wikipedia; active in content generation; have no access to Elsevier ScienceDirect resources via another avenue. I am interested in Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vitalie Ciubotaru (talk) 09:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Vitalie Ciubotaru: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mardetanha (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been working on some article related to human behavoiour, and having access to Science direct would help me Mardetanha talk 12:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Mardetanha: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Queeste (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) Active on Wikipedia for 5 years, often on psychological topics and behavioral sciences. I'm a professional. That's why access to the Social and Behavioral Sciences collection would be very welcome.--Queeste (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Queeste: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Drekamu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I edit lots of science and history-related articles, so this would be useful in accessing more information than can be obtained solely from the abstracts of scientific papers. Since I am especially active in Early History I think the History & Archeology Sciences would be most beneficial to me. --Drekamu (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Drekamu: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Succu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Chris troutman: I'm contributing to dewiki mainly with articles about plants (e.g. around 500 about Aloe species). But my main interest lays in the domain of history of sciences. Examples are de:Ternate-Manuskript or de:Commentariolus. --Succu (talk) 22:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Succu: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Simon Burchell (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Principally on archaeology/anthropology/history topics, mainly Mesoamerica but I sometimes dabble elsewhere. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Simon Burchell: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. John Shandy` (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm interested in a Social & Behavioral Sciences account due to its inclusion of about ~80 economics/finance journals. I'm an active contributor to WikiProjects Finance, Economics, and Globalization. I have previously cited a number of journal articles obtained through ScienceDirect, but no longer have access to it. During my Wikipedia tenure, I have avidly used and cited ScienceDirect sources on a multitude of articles, most of which I have substantively improved such that they have achieved Good article status. My most recent GA article (qualified Dec. 26, 2014) is Global financial system, which cites at least 2 articles obtained through ScienceDirect. One of my other GA articles, Interest rate parity cites at least 10 articles obtained through ScienceDirect. Elsevier's ScienceDirect is an unmatched database for finance/economics journal articles, and I would greatly benefit from new access to it. John Shandy` • talk 03:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @John Shandy`: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. bellagio99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a social scientist who edits 175 Wikipedia pages. As I am retired, I no longer have access through my university library. The social scienist list would be useful, as the key journal in my field is from Elsevier. Bellagio99 (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bellagio99: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. oaktree_b (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): I would like to request access to the Social Sciences module. Of late, I've been doing several edits on historical items; recognnized/heritage buildings in Canada, general North Korean historical articles (trying to get more info for the List of National Treasures of NK), some baseball history articles. I also edit biology/medicine articles and have a chemistry schooling (I work in insurance reviewing medical information). Researching articles on here and on the French wikipedia helps both here and with my job. In particular, the French wiki is terribly short of many articles on medicines (I started the gemfibrozil article, used to treat cholesterol, on the French side). Oaktree b (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Oaktree b: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Tony1 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – ScienceDirect, please, for psychology and bioneurology articles. Tony (talk) 11:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tony1: Just to verify, you are requesting access to the Social & Behavioral Sciences collection? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda:—yes, sorry, S and BS. Tony (talk) 01:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tony1: Sounds good. Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. dr.mbl (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) ScienceDirect for Life science and Social & Behavioral sciences. Please for sociobiology which I reconstructed/still am, and related topics which I edit on a regular basis. Thank you Dr.mbl (talk) 11:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dr.mbl: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Lingzhi (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) More than 40K edits under another user name; 6 FA's; onwiki for about 6 non-continuous years (started 9 years ago). Although I have a PhD, I live and work in a place with very limited access to English-language resources...Currently doing a total, top-to-bottom rewrite on the surprisingly inadequate article on Bengal famine of 1943 in my personal sandbox; shooting for FA in a month or so. After that will be scouting for new topics, perhaps with a humanitarian bent... Also help out with many friends on FA drives (seem to often be involved in painting/visual arts, but am open to any academic field). Just in the past week or so I requested a ScienceDirect article from WP:RX but didn't get it.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lingzhi: Approved for Social Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mhhossein (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've created multiple pages and have promoted two articles to GA level. Social & Behavioral resources will enable me edit much better, I think. Thanks --Mhhossein (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mhhossein: Approved for Social Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Physical Sciences[edit]

  1. Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing English Wikipedia for 10 years now. I have created over 200 articles. I have made over 60,000 live edits. In adition to writing I also have been assisting classes as an online ambassador. I would appreciate access to the physical sciences stream, as I have been writing articles on Chemistry lately. Currently most Elsevier journal content is inaccessible to me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Graeme Bartlett: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. YohanN7 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Doing edits in math and physics articles and researching on my own for pure pleasure. Masters degree's in engineering physics and electrical engineering. Professional career as software engineer. Recent articles: Group structure and the axiom of choice, Closed subgroup theorem and Derivative of the exponential map, mostly my work: Representation theory of the Lorentz group and Classical group. Briefly put, I know how much access to references and original research articles boosts productivity in writing and editing WP articles. Obviously, Physical Sciences is the access option of choice for me. YohanN7 (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @YohanN7: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sandbh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been an editor since 2011, working mainly on chemistry-related articles to do with ambiguous or hard-to define areas such as heavy metals, metalloids, and post-transition metals. By their nature, these are difficult areas to corral without extensive use of supporting references. I regularly encounter citations to ScienceDirect journals in the course of my research but don't have ready access to the articles themselves. Getting a Physical Sciences account would help considerably with my editing endeavours. Sandbh (talk) 12:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Sandbh: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Axiosaurus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am applying for access to the physical science stream. I am retired and do not have ready access to journals. My PhD was in inorganic chemistry. I have been active on English Wikipedia for over 7 years, and am a member of the chemistry, chemicals and elements projects, one of a small number of active editors with a primary interest in inorganic chemistry. I edit inorganic chemicals or general chemistry articles, and have created 70 articles (most recently the general chemistry article Pauling's principle of electroneutrality). Other edits are additions of content to existing articles, typically reactions structures and chemical bonding. Access via Science Direct would speed up the process of obtaining reliable references.Axiosaurus (talk) 11:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Axiosaurus: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Spinningspark (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have had an account on Wikipedia since 2007 and was using Wikipedia before that. I have created dozens of articles to GA standard and six have become featured articles on the front page. I have made substantial contributions to hundreds more. I am an electrical engineer and write mostly in that field, but occassionaly stray into biology and medicine, especially when there is an electrical science aspect to a subject. Thus, the most useful stream to me would be Physical Sciences with Health & Life Sciences as a second choice. SpinningSpark 19:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Spinningspark: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. chjoaygame (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I often contribute to Wikipedia articles, especially on thermodynamics, quantum physics, and microcosmological ontology. I would like access to Physical Sciences for Wikipedia literature survey work.Chjoaygame (talk) 23:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Chjoaygame: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. IJReid (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been an editor for nearly two years now, and am a very active member of the Dinosaur WikiProject. Many descriptions or analyses of important taxa and unique publications are in the journals housed there (specifically Cretaceous Research, a physical sciences journal) and these could greatly improve the neutrality or expand many different dinosaur articles. IJReid (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @IJReid: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. shrikanthv (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I work on parts of new and old electric discoveries and inventions and have created 2 did you know science article previously not present in wiki, finding difficult to get sources and often depending on foreign language sources, is leeding to difficulty incorrect intpretation and translation, a journal access would help a lot to bring down new missing subjects in science to wiki Shrikanthv (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Shrikanthv: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Did not complete registration. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Adavyd (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been creating and editing a number of articles devoted to physics and mathematics, mainly on the ru-wiki, but eventually may be writing something for en-wiki and de-wiki as well. From my work place I have access to most of the APS and AIP journals. At the same time, it is difficult to access Elsevier/ScienceDirect journals when needed. For me, the access to "Physical Sciences" would be desirable. Thank you, — Adavyd (talk) 01:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Adavyd: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pmlineditor (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work on article creation and improvement, primarily in simple.wikipedia but also here in en.wikipedia. A lot of my article work is focused on Computer Science and related areas for which ScienceDirect titles will be useful. Although some of the journals helpful for editing in optical illusions are in the Health & Life Sciences journals, these will probably be more useful to medical science editors; therefore I'm requesting access to the 'Physical Sciences' collections as I feel access to these journals will help me contribute to a wider area of topics. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 07:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved @Pmlineditor: Expect an e-mail from me shortly with instructions on the next step. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Apokryltaros (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I gather a lot of research papers concerning prehistoric animals for both building on wiki-articles and making reconstructions. Many of the journal articles I require are published by Elsevier.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. THE IT (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Registered wikisource user since October 2013; over 3000 edits in German Wikisource (with some following edits in the german Wikipedia); active in researching publications in physics, chemistry and mathematics; Access would help me improving the research on authors and publications for special topics. THE IT (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
    @THE IT: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bramfab (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I write a lot on science topics, mainly earth science and I knwow that Elsevier ScienceDirect host journals that would be useful to improve the quality of the contents of my edit. Regards, --Bramfab (talk) 11:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bramfab: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. V1adis1av (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): I would like to get access to the Physical Sciences collection. 19000+ edits in ru-wiki, mainly in physics, chemistry and astronomy. PhD in Nuclear Physics. --V1adis1av (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @V1adis1av: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jan.Kamenicek (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit articles on astronomy and biological topics mostly for Czech Wikipedia, but from time to time for English Wikipedia as well. At Czech Wikipedia I also take part in reviewing processes. Access to full-text articles would be really helpful. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jan.Kamenicek: Which of the three streams are you most interested in? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: Physical sciences, if possible. Thank you! Jan Kameníček (talk) 06:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jan.Kamenicek: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Avraham (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): My contributions of late focus on mathematics and statistical entries, so having access to the Sciences would be helpful. However, as there are a limited number of accounts, by all means, please pass me over for someone who can be more prolific than I can right now. -- Avi (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Avraham: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. kinema (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): I would like to spend more time expanding and citing works related to sensor networks, distributed data stores, Internet of Things, machine learning, and related subjects.Kinema
    @Kinema: Which of the three streams are you interested in? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: I apologize, I should have included that. I'm primarily interested in the Physical Sciences database. Thanks. Kinema
    Kinema, thank you - you will need to enable email in order to be eligible. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kinema: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: I wanted to let you know that my username request was just completed. The Wikipedian who was once known as Kinema is now voxadam. voxadamτ 03:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi voxadam, thanks for letting me know. I've deleted the doubled form response. Could you please update your application at WP:AAAS and any other Library resources you've applied for? Nikkimaria (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: I resubmitted my application and updated WP:AAAS. If I've missed anything or there's anything else I need to do just let me know. Thanks.voxadamτ 05:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. harDNox (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I participate for a several years in Russian Wikipedia and edit articles in chemistry. I would appreciate access to Physical Sciences. I wrote one GA and interested in good sources for writing them in the future. HarDNox (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @HarDNox: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Waynejayes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Physical sciences please. I am an engineer and my wikipedia work includes improving a wide range of articles including science and engineering articles. Wayne Jayes (talk) 13:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Waynejayes: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. LaurentianShield (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Requesting access to physical sciences. I am an engineer by training, but have a wide variety of interests WRT Wikipedia editing. Currently for example I am working on updates to spark-gap transmitters (the work-in-progess is in my sandbox) and I think I can help elucidate this and similar technical articles with better research access. LaurentianShield (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @LaurentianShield: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Daniele.tampieri (talk · contribs) I mainly contribute to entries on engineering, mathematics and physics, therefore access to ScienceDirect Physical Sciences collection will be most useful to me. I think I meet all the requirements for applying. Best regards, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Daniele.tampieri: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Widefox (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) Physical Sciences please. Here since 2006, 42k edits, created & edited science and tech articles, sometimes get hindered by paywalls. Have a new article in mind, so waiting for access to sources. Widefox; talk 04:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Widefox: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. daqu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing for close to 10 years, above all mathematics articles (I'm a Ph.D. research mathematician without a current affiliation), but many other topics as well. I have greatly benefited from having access to Elsevier journals in the past via institutional affiliation up through June 2013, but I currently have no access through any source. ScienceDirect access now would be a tremendous boon for editing WIkipedia articles as well as for conducting my own mathematics research.
    @Daqu: Approved Expect an email shortly from me with further details. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Magioladitis (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am highly active editor. I research on Mathematics and mainly in Cryptography, Data Security etc. I am doing my phD in Data Security but unfortunately I don't have access to Elsevier. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Magioladitis:Which of the three subjects would you like access to? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: Mathematics. Cryptography is sub-subject of Mathematics. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Magioladitis: Mathematics is not one of the three collections (but may be included in one of them): Health & Life Sciences, Social & Behavioral Sciences, or Physical Sciences. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @TLSuda: Now I understand :) "Physical Sciences" is my answer then. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Magioladitis: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Carol Fenijn (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Contributing since 2003, mainly on nl: wikipedia. Often writes on security and IT related subjects. Hopes access to the subject "Physical Sciences" may help in that. Carol Fenijn (talk) 10:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Carol Fenijn: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a regular contributor, with about 87,000 edits (including deleted). I write on a variety of subjects (though lately I've been working on a variety of bird articles, and am hoping the content will include articles on particular species): I've had 10 articles, predominantly written by me, achieve good status and 3 have been promoted as featured articles – with a few in the pipeline. I often use research access to help others with their writing efforts here, as well as to check sources for verification. I also spend quite a bit of time checking claimed and suspected copyright violations, which requires access to a diversity of sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fuhghettaboutit: Approved Expect an email from me shortly. Cheers, 20:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Kmhkmh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I write since 2007 in the German WP on wide variety of subjects but also in the English WP and Commons. Since I don't have any access via libaries/universities to journals anymore and account would come quite handy. I'm primarily interested in the physical sciences tranch, though in doubt I probably could use any.--Kmhkmh (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kmhkmh: Approved for Physical Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Gorthian (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit all over the place, but my core subjects are in geology, so I would like access to the Physical Sciences section. I've been editing for years (more than 9,000 edits), but go in fits and spurts. I do some work on content, but mostly I do gnoming work. Lately, that includes lots of verifying references and hunting down citations. I don't have access to journals normally, so having access through here would greatly enhance my contributions. Thank you!
    @Gorthian: Approved for Physical Sciences, expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

  1. Marco Ciaramella (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hallo, I would like to apply for "Health & Life Sciences" access for 1 year. My contributions are mostly in History of Technology and Science, including also the biographies related to this general topic. I created a lot of new pages, mostly in italian, but I love to add referencies to the already-existing pages also. I am active in Wikipedia since 2005, covering italian/german/english wikpedia (in Germany I go regularly to the local group meetings). I am currently working on some themes relating Computer Linguistics (on this topic, I peer-reviewed a paper but currently having no access to Elsevier), History of Computing and Telecomunication and their applications in real life (they are a lot!) from an historical point of view. I took a course at the University about History of Technology under professor Vittorio Marchis in Turin, receiving the highest mark. The requested list can fully cover all these topics and would be a really big help. Thank you, best Marco Ciaramella (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia user email soon. HazelAB (talk) 13:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Aethyta (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Greetings, as one of the (sadly very few) contributors to designer drug related articles I'd like to request access to the Health & Life Sciences section to further increase the quality of my work. Aethyta (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Approved Expect a Wikipedia user email soon. HazelAB (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lourdes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Requested access to Social and Behavioral Sciences. I have created 26 articles, including 4 GAs and 5 DYKs and working on Featured Content now. This would be really helpful in researching. Lourdes 01:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lourdes: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 老陳 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am interested in having privilege to access the Physical Sciences section. I have been a wikipedia editor for almost 10 years. My contributions are mainly in translating articles from English to Chinese. I have produced or co-produced 19 Gas in Chinese arena. The granted privilege will be of great value for me to improve the citation for the English articles as well as the translated articles. Thanks for your considerations.--老陳 (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @老陳: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'd like to request access to the Health & Life Sciences section to improve the quality of articles about edible plantsXb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 01:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Xb2u7Zjzc32: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mahdiz (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi. im a engineer and i want to create or Spread article in Wikipedia about civil, geological and earth system. i think The best source for me its Elsevier. im not active with this account for few months because im using another account per WP:VALIDALT. Thanks:)Mahdi talk 04:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mahdiz: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. matthewmayer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) interested in Social & Behavioral Sciences access. Long term editor with interest in improving urban planning and transportation articles for Asia
    @Matthewmayer: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. OppidumNissenae (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am in 2013-14-15 one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. I have free access a Cochrane, BMJ, Adam Matthew Collections, Questia, Credo and HighBeam. Thanks for your considerations.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @OppidumNissenae: Which collection are you requesting? c (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria:Health & Life Sciences; tanks.OppidumNissenae (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @OppidumNissenae: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Icebob99 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like access to the Health and Life Sciences collection. I do a lot of destub work at WP:MICRO and oftentimes I can only use the abstracts of Elsevier resources, so I would really appreciate this subscription. I've been registered since May but I started editing heavily in October of this year. In addition to Wikipedia, I'm in the top 10% of the English Wiktionary users by edits. For an example of what I do in the Microbiology project, see this diff. Hope I can get this resource! Icebob99 (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Icebob99: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Elsevier has been very helpful to me, and I would like to renew my Health and Life subscription. Thank you! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Confirmed that your account meets the requirements. --JustBerry (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     On hold until the status of your Elsevier account has been clarified internally. --JustBerry (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. kashmiri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Access to ScienceDirect has been extremely useful for my research some of which I shared through contributing to WP neurology articles. I will be grateful if my access option be renewed (Health & Life Sciences -> Neurology, Child Neurology & Genetics). — kashmiri TALK 23:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Confirmed that your account meets the requirements. --JustBerry (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     On hold until the status of your Elsevier account has been clarified internally. --JustBerry (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sam Sailor (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Access to ScienceDirect in the Health & Life Sciences collection would prove valuable both in verification and addition of sources, and access to Scopus would be valuable e.g. in determining notability in AfD cases such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal. — Sam Sailor 15:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
     Confirmed that your account meets the requirements. --JustBerry (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sam Sailor: Approved Expect an email with further instructions. --JustBerry (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. SlimVirgin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm currently reviewing or editing two medical articles for which I need access to medical sources, so I would really appreciate a Health & Life Sciences subscription. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @SlimVirgin: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Winged Blades of Godric (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)-Would be working extensively on physics and chemistry articles(esp. organic reactions).The Physical Sciences would be a great benefit.Winged Blades Godric 08:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Winged Blades of Godric: Approved Expect an email with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Everymorning (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I was previously granted this right >2 years ago (see above) and it seems to have since expired, as I get an error message whenever I try to read a full-text article that is not open access. Everymorning (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Everymorning: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ozzie10aaaa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am renewing as I have had this subscription awarded for two years, last year I took West African Ebola virus epidemic to GA status and have almost [4] 35,000 edits, will be looking to take further articles to GA status this year, and would therefore be interested in the "Health & Life Sciences" , thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ozzie10aaaa: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mramoeba (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) would like to be able to access journals as I edit a wide range of science subjects, currently require access to articles by Kate Devlin on artificial intelligence and computing, access to New Scientist etc. Thanks Mramoeba (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mramoeba: Which of the three streams listed above would you like access to? Nikkimaria (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Social and behavioural sciences please. Mramoeba (talk) 23:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mramoeba: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Opabinia regalis (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work on molecular biology/biochemistry articles. I started a new job recently and no longer have institutional journal access. I'd like the health and life sciences package. Thanks! Opabinia regalis (talk) 09:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Opabinia regalis: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Project Osprey (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing chemistry pages almost exclusively for the last 4 years but I don't currently have access to pay-walled content and this would be useful going forward. Ideally I would like access to both the Health & Life Sciences and Physical Sciences accounts as chemistry seems to straddle those areas. --Project Osprey (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Project Osprey: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Elsevier_ScienceDirect/Approved&oldid=1144396209"