Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts

This page is for nominating articles to be listed as articles for improvement, from which the weekly collaborations are pulled. Any article or list on Wikipedia can be nominated, although articles that do not meet the suggested criteria are unlikely to gain consensus.


Instructions[edit]

Suggested criteria[edit]

Though there are no firm criteria, in general, ideal AFI articles are:

  • Highly important topics. Anything that has top or high importance to a WikiProject is likely highly important.
  • Interesting to the general public. This can be evidenced by page views. Nominations with less than 200 views per day rarely succeed.
  • Needing of improvement, with expansion opportunity. Stubs; start-class, and short C-class articles are the most ideal for improvement. Give due consideration before nominating higher-quality articles.
  • Not targets of controversy. Keep in mind that controversial articles (articles that are the subject of heated discussion, edit warring, or questioned notability) can be very difficult to improve within a week.

Review process[edit]

  • Any user may vote on the suitability of nominations to be listed at AFI.
  • Please use the code #'''Support''' or #'''Oppose''', add your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~. You may also add comments. Improperly formatted votes may be missed by the bot.
  • MusikBot will mark nominations with at least 3 net support votes (3 more support votes than oppose votes) as approved and those with at least 3 net oppose votes as unapproved. The bot will automatically list successful nominations and archive all closed nominations.
  • Registered members of the project may choose to override the bot at their discretion in instances where straight vote totals do not appear to reflect community consensus.

Nominating an article[edit]

  1. Check that the article you want to nominate isn't already listed.
  2. Post the nomination at the top of the list in the appropriate category, using this code: 
    ===(Article title)===
{{AFI nom|article=(Article title)|class=unknown|hits=(Number of daily hits)}}
*(Nomination text) ~~~~
  3. Fill out the parts in parentheses. You can find an article's class on its talk page and its approximate daily hits using this tool.
  4. Please do not support your own nominations.

Nominations[edit]

Applied sciences and technology[edit]

Medical prescription[edit]

Medical prescription – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 415 daily hits

  • Important, complex topic with fairly high hits; yet, the article is orange-tagged. Could use a lot of help from multiple editors. BorgQueen (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, high hits, important article, and needs lots of help. SVcode(Talk) 21:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above Brachy08 (Talk) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support, the article definitely needs a makeover, and retrieving good-quality information for it shouldn't be a difficult task. Oltrepier (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support, per above comments B3251 (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Technology[edit]

Technology – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,402 daily hits

  • This is a Vital level 1 article, which means that it is very important to improve. We would need to add references and maybe expand information so this article could get at least to B-class. We would have to expand its length and possibly add images. With hard work from the community I do believe that we can get this article to B-class. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 04:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, it has high hits but I'm not sure if AFI is a place to improve okay articles to B-class and above. SVcode(Talk) 23:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Neutral, important but in a decent state as it is. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support - In my opinion the article could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose already a B-class article. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Role-playing game system[edit]

Role-playing game system – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 42 daily hits

  • This Article is of High importance to the lone WikiProject it is in and only has a lone source to go with it. We can definitely improve the article. Danubeball (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, Even though article doesn't have high hits and is not vital article, it does seem important. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support – Important topic not just for analog gaming but later video game design and programming. Lots of cultural resonance too. — LumonRedacts 14:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Neutral as per SVcode. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support as per LumonRedacts. Wil540 art (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Oppose although important, but it doesn't have a high daily hit. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Support, as per LumonRedacts Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 12:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. Oppose, firmly. RPGs are really not the area we need to be giving extra attention to to combat Wikipedia's systemic bias. This is a niche sub-article of Tabletop role-playing game, which is a well-developed B-class article. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Detonation[edit]

Detonation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 137 daily hits

  • This article though has low hits, needs some more expansion for an article that's really important. SVcode(Talk) 22:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Drone warfare[edit]

Drone warfare – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 221 daily hits

  • This article, though is C-class, is an important article that needs to have it's lead rewritten and more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Point-blank range[edit]

Point-blank range – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 539 daily hits

  • Article about an important topic that needs expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arts[edit]

Dance studio[edit]

Dance studio – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

Ryuichi Sakamoto[edit]

Ryuichi Sakamoto – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,715 daily hits

  • To be fair, most of the YMO-related articles might need to be improved, but this is particularly true for the late Sakamoto, the best known member of the trio and a very well-known musician in general, who has still a C-rated article with some sourcing and formatting issues. Oltrepier (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, seems like this article may need fixing, I'm not sure. SVcode(Talk) 23:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, looks more like B-class to me. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Classificatory disputes about art[edit]

Classificatory disputes about art – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 70 daily hits

  • This article is interesting and crucial, yet is start-rated, thus should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support Very interesting subject matter. Article is long but thin in very important areas. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Neutral, Doesn't seem popular but is in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 14:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alan Hollinghurst[edit]

Alan Hollinghurst – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Vital article in People, Writers.
  • Some references but very stubby BLP. Practically nothing on his writing.
  • Established writer, with a publication history going back to the 1970s, fiction since the 1980s and articles for all his novels.
  • Even pipped future poet laureate Andrew Motion to the Newdigate Prize. Other awards, including lifetime achievement, from 1974 onwards.
  • A Booker Prize winner, so obviously important.
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature - obviously this is very important.
  • External links might offer options for expansion, particularly the article from The Paris Review.
  • X00y (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, vital article in need of expanion. SVcode(Talk) 23:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, low number of page views and not clear how he is vital (but I acknowledge that might be an issue with the article). Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose low daily views. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Oppose Seems good enough. Brachy08 (Talk) 09:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everyday life[edit]

Co-curricular activity (Singapore)[edit]

Co-curricular activity (Singapore) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 86 daily hits

  1. Oppose, article doesn't have lots of hits or high notability. SVcode(Talk) 23:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chechen cuisine[edit]

Chechen cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 41 daily hits

  • This article, though being important ([1], [2] and [3] mention Chechen dishes, meaning this cuisine is no doubt appealing), is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support BorgQueen (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, less hits. SVcode(Talk)
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help.BabbaQ (talk) 07:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
5. Neutral - More of a list per se, but could still use support. Roasted (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ossetian cuisine[edit]

Ossetian cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 13 daily hits

  • As Ossetian pies are now all the rage in the entire Russia (cf. [4] & [5]), this cuisine is no doubt crucial, however the article is now a mere stub, which is a shame. --RekishiEJ (talk) 03:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose, hits too low.SVcode(Talk) 00:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @SVcode: Comment This article is not widely read, yet it is an invalid reason to oppose my proposal since the unpopularity of this article is probably because it is a stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Well,The issue is that the article, while it does pass Non-Controversial and Stubby, It doesn’t jump over hits,and for Importance..It’s at a ??? but it doesn’t seem Top or High. As a result,that’s a. 2.5/4. That’s not enough for me to go support,but it isn’t enough for me to go Oppose. Danubeball (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral per my comment. Danubeball (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose a current fad/trend and long-term vitalness is unclear, especially with the low number of page hits. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment this article is now regarded vital at level 5. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Saucer[edit]

Saucer – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 149 daily hits

  • Tagged for a decade. Mentions the Middle Ages, so is certainly not a recent invention. And what does it say that flying saucer (which is linked at the top) is in a better state than the common static saucer? Gaois (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, even though the article is tagged for a decade, the hits isn't high enough. SVcode(Talk) 22:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose as per SVcode. Wil540 art (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ziti[edit]

Ziti – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 201 daily hits

  • 138 direct links to the page, so relevant to many Wikipedia pages. Also might need merging with baked ziti due to similarities. It can likely be expanded. roasted (talk 00:20 27 June, 2023 (UTC)
  1. Support, has decent amount of hits, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above and because... why not? : D Oltrepier (talk) 16:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rigatoni[edit]

Rigatoni – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 713 daily hits

  • WAY too high of a daily view counter for it to be a stub class. This article needs expansion, so it can fit it’s size/viewership ratio. roasted (talk) 3:44 1 July, 2023 (UTC)
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 17:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above (and because... why not? : D ) Oltrepier (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support per nom. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happiness[edit]

Happiness – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 812 daily hits

  • An important article that needs some cleanup and focus. SVcode(Talk) 20:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chess[edit]

Chess – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5729 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. Plus, while the page generally looks alright, the first half likely lacks citations, and there are some deprecated/unreliable sources here and there. Oltrepier (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geography[edit]

Pah-Ute County[edit]

Pah-Ute County, Arizona Territory – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 240 daily hits

  • High Importance within WP:Nevada, Slides over the 200 rule,start class (Barely even 3 paragraphs.) And most likely non-controversial based off of the No-IP block. Danubeball (talk) 04:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, high enough hits plus article needs expansionn. SVcode(Talk) 21:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help.BabbaQ (talk) 07:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arizona Territory[edit]

Arizona Territory – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 237 daily hits

  • Article with a decent amount of hits that needs more expansion and fixes. SVcode(Talk) 23:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Could need the projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Exploration[edit]

Exploration – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 140 daily hits

  • Important article and an level 5 article in need of expansion and improvement. SVcode(Talk) 23:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Human Geography[edit]

Human Geography – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 429 daily hits

  • Level-5 Vital article in need of section expansion and citation help. SVcode(Talk) 00:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support. Level 5 vital article and high daily hits. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 23:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

History and politics[edit]

Spencer Compton, 1st Earl of Wilmington[edit]

Spencer Compton, 1st Earl of Wilmington – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~121 daily hits

  • The second Prime Minister of Great Britain is obviously a highly notable topic, but currently it's in a terrible state. I suspect some of the information (such as the dates given for his tenure as Speaker of the House of Commons) isn't even correct. Full of [citation needed] tags, and is written like an essay. Could definitely benefit from improvement. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, vital article that has multiple issues that AFI could help in. SVcode(Talk) 23:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Abdalá Bucaram[edit]

Abdalá Bucaram – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 54 daily hits

  • This is a level 5 vital article and has needed significant attention since 2009. I've tried to do some work on it, but it needs a team effort to become good. The subject has also been in the news in the last six months. -Jmjosh90 22:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, article in need of help that is important. SVcode(Talk) 00:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Abolitionism[edit]

Abolitionism – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~900 daily hits

  • A subject of monumental importance to world history, politics, humanity's social evolution and the history of the struggle for racial equality and human rights. The page is currently in a poor state of verification, with numerous unsourced parts. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 00:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above. Oltrepier (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Warren Weaver[edit]

Warren Weaver – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~30 daily hits

  • The article on Warren Weaver has a lot of room for improvement. He is one of the most important people who came up with the principles for machine translation. I believe this could be a Level 4, maybe even a Level 3, article. I'm certainly not that great at editing, but I tried to make some of my own changes. Although, I made the reference to my source repeat too much. GoutComplex (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, article looks fine. SVcode(Talk) 00:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, significantly too low hits. Brachy08 (Talk) 02:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Romina Pourmokhtari[edit]

Romina Pourmokhtari – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,340 daily hits

  • This article is definitely crucial, since Pourmokhtari is currently the Minister for the Environment in Sweden, and it is a mere stub and has a lot of daily hits, hence it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, has lots of hits but needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - reviewed, The project could really improve this article.BabbaQ (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support: it seems like the article has been expanded a bit since you nominated it, but still, it could use some more work! Oltrepier (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Intangible cultural heritage[edit]

Intangible cultural heritage – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 288 daily hits

  • Article with greater than 200 hits that needs cleanup and expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hunger strike[edit]

Hunger strike – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 749 daily hits

  1. Support per nom. The topic comes up regularly in the news, for obvious reasons. BorgQueen (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Colonel[edit]

Colonel – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 961 daily hits

Strike (attack)[edit]

Strike (attack) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 213 daily hits

  • An important article that needs expansion and citations. SVcode(Talk) 23:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dab page. Guessing you mean Strike (attack)? - Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strike action[edit]

Strike action – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 445 daily hits

  • Important article that's a vital article with high hits in need of our help. SVcode(Talk) 23:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. agree with nom.BabbaQ (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commander[edit]

Commander – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 437 daily hits

Navy[edit]

Navy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 398 daily hits

Ambush[edit]

Ambush – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 177 daily hits

  • Even though hits are a bit low, this article is still very important that needs improvement. SVcode(Talk) 22:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go.BabbaQ (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Polling Station[edit]

Polling station – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 92 daily hits

  • Though with low hits, this is by no means an important article that needs updating and some expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Could need the projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precedent[edit]

Precedent – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 377 daily hits

  • Vital article with high hits in need of more citations and more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support A major legal topic with high hits. BorgQueen (talk) 11:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Language and literature[edit]

Consonant[edit]

Consonant – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 749 daily hits

  • Level-4 vital article and very high hits. The article could use more citations and copyediting. BorgQueen (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alonso Quijano[edit]

Alonso Quijano – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Main Protagonist of Don Quixote, the first modern novel, and the first big hit of literature ever, it is one of the most translated books ever, and it is short and has no citations. Sportsfangnome (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, an important article that needs improvement.SVcode(Talk) 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tertiary source[edit]

Tertiary source – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

  • Even though it has low hits, this article is a level-5 vital article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, low hits, but it is also a level-5 vital article. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 02:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linguistic description[edit]

Linguistic description – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 69 daily hits

  • Another literature-related article that's a vital article that needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mathematics and computer science[edit]

Keygen[edit]

Keygen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 123 daily hits

  • This article is absolutely crucial, since keygens illegitimately distributed may contain malware, and computer security is absolutely vital even for average PC users, yet it is currently a mere stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, Even though it seems important, it isn't vital article and doesn't have enough hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Per nom --Wil540 art (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help.BabbaQ (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Computer algebra system[edit]

Computer algebra system – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 144 daily hits

  1. Support Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Browser wars[edit]

Browser wars – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 217 daily hits

  • Article that needs more improvement with citations and cleanup. SVcode(Talk) 00:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose. A decent C-class article on a niche topic, and in an area that benefits from systemic bias. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support indeed, could need the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Neutral Article can be improved, but is also niche and can face bias Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per Sdkb. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Oppose Interesting topic but somewhat niche and historic at this point. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Building Information Modeling[edit]

Building Information Modeling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 816 daily hits

  • Article that is poorly sourced and could use some expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - project could be helpful here.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Music[edit]

Natural sciences[edit]

ʻAkikiki[edit]

ʻAkikiki – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 56 daily hits

Magnesium[edit]

Magnesium – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1843 daily hits

  • Level 4 vital article about an element that is literally everywhere. Brachy08 (Talk) 03:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support Sure! The article definitely needs improvement, especially due to the severe lack of citations throughout the page. Oltrepier (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jewish deli[edit]

Jewish deli – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 103 daily hits

  • Historically relevant topic as delicatessens are now seen all over the world. The article is a stub and very thin on information. --Wil540 art (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support An important stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Neutral, needs improvement but doesn't have lot of hits. I am keeping it at neutral because it seems to be important. SVcode(Talk) 00:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. Agree with nom.BabbaQ (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Carbon source[edit]

Carbon source – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

  • Because molecules that an organism uses as its carbon source for generating biomass are referred to as "carbon sources" in biology. Highly relevant topic and an article that needs an update. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, though doesn't have vital level or high hits, it is an important one in need of help.SVcode(Talk) 00:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support, per above Brachy08 (Talk) 03:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sRGB[edit]

SRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 498 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and has been the most frequently used (though many visible colours are not included, even some that can be reproduced in the CMYK printing) RGB colour space, however it is now of Start-class, meaning that Wikipedians that are expert in color science should improve it a.s.a.p.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC) added some words 07:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, Important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - review, The project could really improve this article.BabbaQ (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adobe RGB color space[edit]

Adobe RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 86 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and a lot of art designers love it, yet it is of Start-class, having two inline templates ({{failed verification}} and {{dubious}}), thus it definitely should be an AFI, despite having a low daily-hit number.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, Vital article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wide-gamut RGB color space[edit]

Wide-gamut RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 38 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, Short article in need of major expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ProPhoto RGB color space[edit]

ProPhoto RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 51 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and is no doubt for art designers, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - The project could really improve this article.BabbaQ (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support per nom. BorgQueen (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

scRGB[edit]

ScRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 24 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Monorchism[edit]

Monorchism – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 139 daily hits

  • This article isn't unimportant and can be even crucial for many readers, and users can easily access it even if they haven't encountered this word before by viewing the hatnote of monarchism (my experience), yet its lead is too short, the section "Causes" lacks inline citations, and the sub-section "Due to testicular cancer" lacks adequate citations.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, article doesn't have enough hits even though it needs improvement. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Manx cat[edit]

Manx cat – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 817 daily hits

  1. Oppose Article is long, only 2-3 sections need improvement. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Article is long but still needs work. It's an interesting topic. I support it. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Natural resource[edit]

Natural resource – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1426 daily hits

  • Article is common for reference and is a popular page. It is about a subject many people want to learn the bare minimum about, so it only makes since to serve them with a quality and encyclopedic article. Fails to meet many quality standards, and sentences are unclear or meandering.Mebigrouxboy (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, it can do with more expansion but I think that about it. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Relevant topic and could use a scientific tune up. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Environmental impacts of animal agriculture[edit]

Environmental impacts of animal agriculture – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 157 daily hits

  • Although this article is seemingly detailed, in actuality it is not comprehensive enough, since the "Beneficial environmental effects" section requires expansion, and some statements are currently tagged with "citation needed", "failed verification" and "further explanation needed", meaning this article ought to be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, I'm not sure if this should be in AFI because article seems good enough without the "citation needed", "failed verification", etc. SVcode(Talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Article can be improved with sources Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose Long article, minority of sections need improvement. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per PerfectSoundWhatever. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Oppose Article is rather in-depth/comprehensive already. It needs a couple experts to come edit it, not AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ipomoea alba[edit]

Ipomoea alba – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 248 daily hits

  • This article needs more citations and expanding. SVcode(Talk) 15:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support needs the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Article can be approved Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose Low vital-ness / importance. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose Article looks pretty good, what do you want from AFI on it? --Wil540 art (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pitaya[edit]

Pitaya – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3487 daily hits

  • This article has a lot of hits but needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support Interesting and popular food article could use attention. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

People/Companies and organisations/Products[edit]

Bic (company)[edit]

Bic (company) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 491 daily hits

  • major manufacturing corporation, widely known for manufacturing stationery products such as ballpoint pens & lighters. in need of quite a bit of rework and translation from its french article counterpart. article is notable enough and receives enough views. B3251 (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Entergy[edit]

Entergy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 79 daily hits

  • This article contains outdated information, notably on the status of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, which closed in 2012. This article is in desperate need of an update. WikiRegularAtSchool (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, article doesn't seem important though it needs help. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose low daily hits, and the article isn't very important. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ulead PhotoImpact[edit]

Ulead PhotoImpact – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 16 daily hits

  • A once popular Windows-only raster image editor among amateur photographers and web designers guarantees its importance, though it is now discontinued.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, doesn't seem important. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose per low viewership and general importance. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Corel VideoStudio[edit]

Corel VideoStudio – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 47 daily hits

  • A Windows-only video editor that no doubt has been used by many.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, isn't an important article but needs help. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Essence Engine[edit]

Essence Engine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 103 daily hits

  1. Oppose, less hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    1. @SVcode:Now it has significantly more daily hits, so your argument doesn't stand anymore.--RekishiEJ (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      (death) Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 04:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FastPass[edit]

FastPass – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2411 daily hits

  • High Improtance within Disney and Theme Parks, start class, has potential for expansion. The only issue maybe would be controversy, but even then, there’s no locks at all for editors. Danubeball (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, important article in need of our help. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gundam Evolution[edit]

Gundam Evolution – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 115 daily hits

  • This video game, although no vital, actually is still notable, not obscure and the article on it is a mere stub, meaning it requires expansion.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose only 115 daily hits, and a tag on the article is opposite of what you said saying, "This article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines." MasterMatt12💬 ● 📝 00:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, not really notable. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose, per above. Brachy08 (Talk) 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of Roblox games[edit]

List of Roblox games – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 483 daily hits

  1. Support, this article needs more citations and has lots of hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Microsoft Edge[edit]

Microsoft Edge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1082 daily hits

  • This article, although being B-rated, should still be an AFI because it is now considered vital at level 5, its New Edge release history is outdated, and the infobox does not show the newest stable release version and date at all. --RekishiEJ (talk) 07:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC) added the statement that it is now considered vital 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, sure that section may need updating but the article in the whole seems fine. SVcode(Talk) 23:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Microsoft Office 2021[edit]

Microsoft Office 2021 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 724 daily hits

  • An article about a frequently used current office suite yet is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, lots of hits, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 21:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Aladdin (BlackRock)[edit]

Aladdin (BlackRock) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 473 daily hits

  • Software program vital to the operations of financial and investment institutions including BlackRock, whose page has prominent links to it. As per the current page, this software is used to manage over $20 trillion annually, but it is a stub and information on the page is extremely out of date (it was last edited in December 2022). Considering Aladdin's vital role in the current global economy, it's important to have accessible information about it, especially since it seems that non-primary sources about the system are sparse on the Internet.

This topic is relevant to multiple categories. Due to its scope, and the sheer scale of the monetary assets it is involved with. I feel it should also receive higher importance in the WikiProjects it is listed in — currently it is a part of 4 WikiProjects, but is of Low importance for 3 and unranked in the last. Because of the above reasons, my opinion is that its importance should be increased by one tier in each WikiProject and potentially raised to High-importance in WikiProject Finance & Investment.Ooo Salt ooo (talk) 01:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  1. Support, important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. BabbaQ (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support per nom. BorgQueen (talk) 08:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Winamp[edit]

Winamp – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 585 daily hits

  • This article, though B-rated, is actually flawed because it requires updating and the new features of Winamp 5.9 is not sufficiently stated.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, even though it is B-class, it needs updating and expanding. SVcode(Talk) 23:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Subsidiary[edit]

Subsidiary – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2339 daily hits

  • Article with lots of hits that needs expansion and citations. SVcode(Talk) 22:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - The project could really improve this article. After reviewBabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support — The numbers don’t lie. Brachy08 (Talk) 06:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prime (drink)[edit]

Prime (drink) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5567 daily hits

  • Important article with lots of hits that needs lots of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Looks good to go.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Philosophy and religion[edit]

Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors[edit]

Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~450 daily hits

  • This is a Level 4 article that needs improvement because of poor citation, a lack of elaboration, and the huge cultural importance and impact of the myths and figures involved. GoutComplex (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, level 4 vital article with lots of hits needing expansion and other help. SVcode(Talk) 23:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Philosopher[edit]

Philosopher – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 654 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Comment, philosopher now redirects to philosophy.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Society and social sciences[edit]

Counterfeit money[edit]

Counterfeit money – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 341 daily hits

  • A major economy/crime topic with high hits, yet the article is orange-tagged. Needs a lot more citations and copyediting. BorgQueen (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

School spirit[edit]

School spirit – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 33 daily hits

  • A general topic article that is in truly terrible shape (see all the tags). Also presumably needs better integration into the encyclopedia, as its low pageview count is likely a result of underlinking from other articles. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dissenting opinion[edit]

Dissenting opinion – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 67 daily hits

  • This article, although having the number of average daily hits lower than 100, should still be an AFI since it is a crucial topic in jurisprudence and the section "Dissenting opinions by region" requires expansion.--RekishiEJ (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, looks important but doesn't have much importance or hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, defines an important component of legal decisions. Ooo Salt ooo (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agriculture in Haiti[edit]

Agriculture in Haiti – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 29 daily hits

  • Very complex and interesting topic with global implications. The article needs attention, specifically copy editing and additional sources. --Wil540 art (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, per AFI. SVcode(Talk) 23:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

99-year lease[edit]

99-year lease – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 120 daily hits

  • This legal topic is interesting, yet is Start-rated, with some unsourced claims and specifically marked weasel-worded phrases.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support Very interesting article subject. The article itself needs work. --Wil540 art (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Neutral, seems like important with lots of help needed but I'm not sure. SVcode(Talk) 23:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Public Domain Day[edit]

Public Domain Day – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 80 daily hits

  • Public Domain Day is a yearly celebration of works entering the public domain, a highly relevant topic to Wiki-work, no matter what country you are editing from. The article is start class and could absolutely use improvements. Wil540 art (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, seems important and in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, article is in fine enough shape (ORES predicts C-class, and I concur), and gets few hits. highly relevant topic to Wiki-work is a reason to oppose, not support — Wikipedians will naturally gravitate to a topic like this without our help. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Economy of Texas[edit]

Economy of Texas – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 337 daily hits

  • This article definitely needs to be an AFI, because it is tagged with {{Update}} and widely read on the Internet. I discovered the issue after trying to confirm my impression that Texas is economically more equal than California by reading the article (by the way, I finally knew that my impression is true by reading List of U.S. states and territories by income inequality, yet confused because one article in HK01 says that America's Gini index (after governmental intervention) is lower (lower than 0.4) than Hong Kong's (higher than 0.4)). --RekishiEJ (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC) altered diction a little 09:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, Interesting topic but too regional for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    1. Comment Not too regional for AFI, since Texas is the 2nd-most populous state in the U.S.A, a very strong economy and is now a popular destination for people that emigrate from California, Illinois and New York.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      1. Support RekishiEJ you make good points about the significance of Texas's Economy that I did not consider. I've changed my mind and I now support this nomination. --Wil540 art (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, an article with lots of hits and is very important that needs our help. SVcode(Talk) 23:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Integrated Care System[edit]

Integrated Care System – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 29 daily hits

  • ICSs have become statutory in England since 1 July 2022, and I don't think the article explains them accurately at all or references more recent NHS guidance on them. Still largely in future tense. Highly important as they are the bodies that commission all the nationalised health and care services in England. The page for the bodies they replaced, clinical commissioning groups, has 55 daily views. Djelibey (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, less hits and isn't vital article. SVcode(Talk) 23:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, too regional for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fenghuang[edit]

Fenghuang – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 508 daily hits

  1. Support, Lots of hits but needs expansion and more citations. SVcode(Talk) 00:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per above. Brachy08 (Talk) 01:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grading in education[edit]

Grading in education – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 347 daily hits

  1. Oppose Not that short, merely orange-tagged, sourcing isn't too bad. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose, Per above. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Godi media[edit]

Godi media – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 287 daily hits

  1. Support, higher than 200 hits and needs expansion. SVcode(Talk) 14:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support needs the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Neutral Article can definitely be improved but is low-importance Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose Low importance. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Oppose, Article looks fairly long as of 2022. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Neutral, per above. —-Brachy08 (Talk) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Constitutional law of the United States[edit]

Constitutional law of the United States – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 32 daily hits

  • An important article, yet requires jurists' attention because the overall organization requires refinement, large parts of this article are quite poorly sourced and seem to contain a significant amount of original research.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support, even though with low hits, this article definitely has more room for improvement. SVcode(Talk) 17:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Oppose an important topic for sure, but only to one nation; even then, despite the USA being a first world country the hits here are very low. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    1. Comment this topic is important not just for Americans, since American Supreme Court cases have been studied and used by Taiwanese legal professionals, and Taiwan does not implement common law system at all, unlike America.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support - per SVcodes rationale.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose Tagged as needing expert attention: AFI should be friendly towards new editors. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 11:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Support Article is used a standard in law and can be improved Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Oppose Per Rubbish computer. Also, article is long and appears well-sourced at a glance (probably better from when this was nominated). Better to AFI the worse articles. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c)
  7. Comment I've altered the name, since the target article has been renamed, and updated the "hits" parameter.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  8. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CEDU[edit]

CEDU – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1 daily hits

  • This historic company in america run a group of therapuetic boarding schools and wilderness programs. the history sections of the company are in need of expanison and improvement. 1keyhole (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Oppose, the article as a whole might need a bit of expansion but article isn't important. SVcode(Talk) 23:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kidnapping[edit]

Kidnapping – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 631 daily hits

  • An article about an important crime that needs to be more updated and expanded. SVcode(Talk) 23:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Civilian[edit]

Civilian – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 163 daily hits

  • Civilian is an important article (many people in the world are civilians) that needs expansion, more citations, etc. SVcode(Talk) 17:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sport[edit]

Cynthia McKinney[edit]

Cynthia McKinney – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 46,382 daily hits

  • This article is completely out of date, and is written in a completely non-encyclopedic manner that gives false credence to the conspiracy theories she has spread. Cpotisch (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support, per AFI.SVcode(Talk) 23:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose, The article absolutely needs an informed CE but I don't think AFI is appropriate. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support, per SVcode Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 02:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fast Bowling[edit]

Fast Bowling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 291 daily hits

  • Important article that is underdeveloped and needs more citations. SVcode(Talk) 15:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Support - Could get help from project.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Plenty of potential for improvement. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 11:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Oppose. There are many many areas of Wikipedia without an active editor base that desperately need this project's help. Cricket articles are absolutely not one of them. Can we please try harder to make this project one that reduces Wikipedia's systemic bias rather than reinforcing it? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    We are here to evaluate this article, not the area of the articles scope. Nor the fact that other articles might need our help even more. If you have those concerns, then nominate those articles. A nomination concerns the article, not the scope.BabbaQ (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @BabbaQ, there can only be one weekly AFI at a time, and giving it to this article would mean denying it to a different one. So yes, I think it matters if there are other articles that need our help far more. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Oppose, concur with Sdkb. Scope should matter at AFI, some topics are just never suitable. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 10:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Neutral Article can be improved but does not have a large scope Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Oppose Too long, not vital-y enough. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FK Mladá Boleslav[edit]

FK Mladá Boleslav – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1036 daily hits

  • This Czech association football club has some recent history of getting to European football and managed to get 7th place in the 2021-22 Fortunaliga, but it has a bad article, at least in my opinion. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 14:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. Neutral, article looks fine but can do with a bit more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Field hockey[edit]

Field hockey – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 789 daily hits

  • This is an important sport that needs more expansion and improvement. SVcode(Talk) 21:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sports governing body[edit]

Sports governing body – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 156 daily hits

  • Though it doesn't have lots of hits this is an important article that most major sports in the world have. SVcode(Talk) 21:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Music/Television[edit]

South Park (franchise)[edit]

South Park (franchise) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 198 daily hits

  1. Neutral, important article with high hits but I'm not sure if it needs more expansion or not. I think most of the information is covered by other articles. SVcode(Talk) 23:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Positions (song)[edit]

Positions (song) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 166 daily hits

  1. Neutral, low hits but needs expansion and could be an important article. Not sure if Mid-Importance in a wikiproject makes the article important. SVcode(Talk) 20:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations&oldid=1175682757"