Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tresean Gore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tresean Gore[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Subject fails GNG as fight announcements and fight results sources are merely routine reports Subject also fails WP:NMMA for not ranked top ten in the world. As present he ranked #336 in middleweight. Cassiopeia talk 04:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and South Carolina. Cassiopeia talk 04:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom. Does not meet criteria for WP:NMMA and passing mentions and event results are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Lethweimaster (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good enough to stay especially because of his upcoming bout with hype train Bo Nickal. Have 3 or more bouts in UFC etc.. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 13:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:NMMA have changed, its no longer 3 UFC fights to be considered notable. Lethweimaster (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Lethweimaster. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even close to being ranked in the top 100, much less top 10, so clearly fails to meet WP:NMMA. Typical reporting of sports results is insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON Nswix (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.