Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tautology (rhetoric) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN#April Fools nominations getting out of hand. Sandstein 18:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tautology (rhetoric)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete because the article should be deleted. And if it is deleted, it is no longer on Wikipedia. And it should no longer be on Wikipedia because it needs to be deleted. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just too much fun. And because this is just too much fun the article should be deleted. And this article should be deleted because this is just too much fun. Bulldog73 ^talk da contribs _{go rando} 01:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nominator's rationale is wrong, because deletion is not actually deletion. When a Wikipedia page is deleted it remains on Wikipedia; all that happens is that it becomes invisible to those who are not administrators.
Did the nominator intend to nominate oxymoron instead? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your mom is an oxymoron. :-P Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - Your sister! — Dennisthe2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, a user on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, believe, think, and support the notion, idea, or thought that this article, piece of writing, or passage should be removed, deleted, killed, ended, stopped, taken off, destroyed, obliterated, and removed. Therefore, it will no longer be existent or present on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, support this. — P C B 03:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that may be a little redundant and repetitive. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For removal's sake, delete this already!!! --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the article should be kept. And if it is kept, it will remain on Wikipedia. And it should remain on Wikipedia because it needs to be kept. Carrite • ^{(Mock my rationale here)} 01:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, a user on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, believe, think, and support the notion, idea, or thought that this article, piece of writing, or passage should be removed, deleted, killed, ended, stopped, taken off, destroyed, obliterated, and removed. Therefore, it will no longer be existent or present on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, support this. — P C B 07:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, a user on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, believe, think, and support the notion, idea, or thought that this article, piece of writing, or passage should be removed, deleted, killed, ended, stopped, taken off, destroyed, obliterated, and removed. Therefore, it will no longer be existent or present on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I, User:Pzoxicuvybtnrm, support this. — P C B 07:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article, because if we delete articles like this one which are nominated for deletion, then Wikipedia will run out of obscure topics that we need to delete because they are obscure. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, burn, stop, put an end, terminate because I want, I desire, I wish. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 12:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tautology (rhetoric). *Dan T.* (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exterminate!. The Daleks' reasoning behind exterminating this article is the Daleks' reasoning behind exterminating this article.--Daleks do not need to sign their edits! ^Exterminate_{Report! Report! How's my exterminating? List of victims Exterminate this article!}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.