Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Kshetra Korthan Khandoba Devastan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shree Kshetra Korthan Khandoba Devastan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject was not mentioned in the cited book, and the Marathi version of the article relies on the official website of the temple. Searches online only found two Marathi articles, both were announcements of upcoming festivals that would be held in the temple in 2021. Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, India, and Maharashtra. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. There are no sources that use this name; perhaps this temple is better known by another name. DreamRimmer (talk) 16:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Seems to have a large number of devotees attending the Yatra if this report is reliable. https://marathi.abplive.com/photo-gallery/news/maharashtra-khandoba-yatra-parner-ahmednagar-pimpalgaon-korthan-khandoba-jatra-photo-latest-news-1139136. Also this about a 451 year old inscription https://divyamarathi.bhaskar.com/local/maharashtra/ahmednagar/news/published-marathi-translation-of-korthan-khandoba-temple-inscription-451-years-ago-unveiled-by-pandurang-gaikwad-129686787.html. As it was "neglected" for many years it's likely difficult to uncover historical sources for the site. Rupples (talk) 03:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could not find any WP:SIGCOV in gnews or gbooks. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.