Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosamund Else-Mitchell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosamund Else-Mitchell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly random person; article written by an admitted paid editor. Biruitorul ^Talk 12:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 1 gnews says it all. Fails WP:BIO and possible promotional article. LibStar (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Educator did education things, then became publisher and did publishing things. Lacks WP:SIGCOV references, so fails WP:ANYBIO. UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The EdTech Digest top 100 movers in education/technology mention gave me a minute to pause, because it sounds like a significant feat. But I can't find any evidence online that EdTech Digest is itself notable (or anything but an advertising platform). Without that independent evidence of notability, I need to agree with the Delete votes above. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC) (forgot to sign. date here is wrong)[reply]
Delete Article subject fails WP:GNG, most of the references are PDF links & I also don't think linkedin can be use as a reference as well.--Meligirl5 (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - couldn't agree more especially with the Linkedin! MaskedSinger (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.