Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Schultz (news)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Schultz (news)[edit]
- Michael Schultz (news) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very non-notable weatherman. Borderline speedy, maybe. Drmies (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - What the heck is "very non-notable"? Does that mean there are negative extant independently published sources? Carrite (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete lacking in-depth sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cites offered are his bio on his local TV station's website and some spam site that doesn't mention him. Found nothing else on Google search. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.