Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Canning Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Canning Studios[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is largely promotional material written by an employee of the company. The majority of the information comes from the company itself. A few other sources are cited, but only the WSJ and Times Leader article mention the company at all. Both do so only in passing. The article does not appear to meet the standards for notability. Owunsch (talk) 02:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, Scotland, and Connecticut. Skynxnex (talk) 02:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NCORP, WP:COI, and nom. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.