Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Liberal Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep; nominator has withdrawn nomination and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indian Liberal Party[edit]
- Indian Liberal Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable third party source can be found. No scope for improvement. Benedictdilton (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Despite the assertion above, Google Books turns up several references, one of which I have added to the article. Apart from that it shows evidence of a 1987 book entitled "Political activity of the Liberal Party in India, 1919-1937", and even a quiz book in which they are one of the answer options. It is also worth checking the various Wikilinks to prominent menbers of this party. AllyD (talk) 19:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is one of many India-related AFDs posted by the same nominator within a few minutes, all with the exact same rationale. The other three that I looked at, I was able to immediately find sources. I have left a message on the nominator's talk page. I'm expecting these should all just be speedy closed. postdlf (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kindly Close this AFD I found some reference on Google Books Will try to improve it based on that.Benedictdilton (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.