Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Jharkhandi Hai (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hum Jharkhandi Hai (film)[edit]

The result was Delete. Consensus was that an article on this topic fails WP:NFF. Recreation may be considered once inclusion criteria can be met. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Jharkhandi Hai (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two-sentence article about an "upcoming" film. PROD removed without comment or explanation. No references supplied, no reliable sources found, only Facebookery. Fails WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No evidence of notability and per WP:NFF. Harsh (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -I see 'no sign of significance' of the said film. Perhaps, creator Manojnmims, may want to add few words on here about the film? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. What I see here is borderline A1/A3. There's literally no meat on the skeleton here, and the author's request at REFUND doesn't give me much hope that any good sources will be found anytime soon. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'm usually lenient on upcoming films but this has no info at all - No plot, No cast and No sources .... Clearly no evidence of notability!. –Davey2010(talk) 20:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.