Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartless Moon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No support for deletion here. A merger did not gain consensus it seems, best to continue discussing it on talk. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heartless Moon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bare tracklist Rathfelder (talk) 08:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative keep. There are reviews: [1] from AllMusic, [2] from Exclaim!, and [3] from CMJ. Someone who's into this sort of thing could probably find more sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics ^Talk→ Be a guest 09:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I believe that the critical praise for the album from reliable sources justify retaining and expanding what we have here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Brendan Gamble per WP:NALBUM. This is, after all, a bare track listing. Maybe someday if someone writes a lot of stuff about it, someone else can split it off into its own article. FalconK (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I added the above sources to the article. I don't think I did a great job, but it's more than just a track list now. If someone wants to work it over and expand it, that'd be great, but WP:NEXIST says they don't have to. I don't know if it got reviewed in other sources besides the ones I found, but the fact that it got a glowing review in CMJ leads me to believe that it probably attracted some kind of attention elsewhere, too. I don't know where to look to find reviews for sensitive pop songs, though. If this were a speed metal album, yeah, maybe I could dig up more than three reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.