Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 23:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hardic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable fictional language in Ursula K. Le Guin's fantasy world, with an unhealthy dose of WP:OR (the Phonology section) thrown in. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unless LeGuin publishes some details (is there any reason to believe she has given it more than a name?), it's a permanent stub. —Tamfang (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- some fictional languages are notable, but this does not appear to be one. There does not appear to be any independent writing to support the notability of the language. LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.