Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ettawa Springs, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ettawa Springs, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure that this site meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Found some older coverage stating that this was a resort with 7 cabins. As noted at User:Hog Farm/springs, this is not mentioned in a directory of natural springs in California. When I search in An Arcadia press book about resorts in Lake County, nothing is coming up for me. Newspapers.com coverage is a vast string of "houses of rent" real estate listings and a few passing mentions that things happened at the Ettawa Springs resort: the discovery of a dead body, an accidental shooting, and an insecticide poisoning.

Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong places, but all I'm really getting are trivial mentions, unreliable genealogy-type stuff, and a crap ton of real estate listings that don't contribute to notability. As a resort, not a community, it fails GEOLAND, and I'm not convinced that GNG is met here. Hog Farm _Talk 17:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Talk 17:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Talk 17:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to have arisen from the Ettawa Berry Ranch which is seen inviting campers here in 1919. Nothing comes up before that so I think it's safe to discount any long-lost ghost town. Marketed as a resort from the 30s with serviced cabins but by 1995 the site is for sale stating "Lodge/cabins probably not salvageable. Old RV park". No evidence that it was a collection of permanent homes.----Pontificalibus 17:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My research yields the same as the nomination, with the addition that the 1972 Woodall's Trailering Parks and Campgrounds gives location data only. Uncle G (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No post office. I found the same trivial, non-notable coverage in newspapers.com. JSTOR returns one article about moss with a trivial mention. GBooks has a few trivial mentions - nothing of note. This is a non-notable location without legal recognition and with only trivial coverage so #1 and #2 of WP:GEOLAND are not met.Cxbrx (talk) 05:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.