Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edvin Kanka Ćudić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edvin Kanka Ćudić[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in the article indicates what makes this person notable. There are no reliable sources for a BLP. I first submitted a prod blp tag, which was removed by the article's originator, so I decided to go with a db-bio tag, which was removed by a brand new editor with no other edits, who claims this person is important in his country. That's possible, but there's nothing here which says what makes him important. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy Delete~~ ~~No assertion of notability is even made in the article, so CSD A7 should apply.~~ Safiel (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ The sources added by the article creator consist of a Facebook entry, a Twitter entry and two entries that are either blog posts or editorials. Still no reliable sources to establish notability and still no credible assertion of notability made. Safiel (talk) 01:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy delete because he was described as a prominent journalist and actor. I don't think it matters if the article hangs around for a week! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no coverage in reliable sources to establish this person as a notable journalist. -- Whpq (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While somewhat better sourced, still no indication that this article passes WP:Notability. Safiel (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: 22-year old journalist, article created by new editor, no claim to notability. Also pretty poorly written. Deletion will cause no harm in this case.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet the WP:N. This entry reads like a résumé or a CV. --Ryan.germany (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.