Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duckmaloi Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duckmaloi Road[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NROAD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete Given that there's no claim to notability, I see no reason to keep what is evidently an ordinary if rather windy rural road. Mangoe (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A WP:BEFORE search shows there are quite a few sources, many of which seem to provide significant coverage of this road; for example its maintenance. Somebody who is knowledgeable in the subject area could probably incorporate them into the article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - @HumanBodyPiloter5:, can you show us some examples that are significant and non-local? Deus et lex (talk) 01:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found such sources as [1], but none are actually significant coverage beyond routine local news about repairs and upgrades any generic road gets. It's hardly even encyclopedic to mention such mundanity, much less notable. Reywas92^Talk 15:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Routine coverage of maintenance and repair work does not satisfy WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot find anything other than the ordinary and routine for any road with this name for ~100 years. Every road gets maintenance, etc. The most interesting thing I found was this and this, that is, critically the name "Duckmaloi Road" has applied to two different roads in the very same area, changing on 27 March 1997, so any article/s will have to keep the two separate. Aoziwe (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Reywas92, fails WP:GNG with only local and routine coverage, and doesn't seem to be a clear alternative to deletion given there are two roads with the same name and the roads pass through a number of different localities. Deus et lex (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.