Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNSimple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DNSimple[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on primary sources (Company blogs, company slideshow, company announcements) and one user generated content as sources. Only found trivial mentions of the subject online. The article was nominated for speedy deletion in the first ten minutes of creation, and was declined for being "the first DNS provider to offer this capability using a custom DNS record type", a claim that wasn't backed up by any source. Considering that the creating account has only ever edited this particular article, it is highly likely to be WP:PROMO. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Internet. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG not met - the only independent reference in the article is that Dave Winer mentioned it once on his blog. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.