Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrillisation of English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillisation of English[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also included:

Cyrillisation of Italian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cyrillisation of Portuguese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cyrillisation of Spanish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Because these articles were all created around the same time by Thiscouldbeauser (talk · contribs), and are sourced only to Omniglot. Prodded by Fram (talk · contribs) for failing WP:GNG, but deprodded by the creator on a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS basis. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I couldn't find evidence that any of these creations of a cyrillic alphabet for Latin languages were actually notable. Fram (talk) 13:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable, no evidence of actual use. —Mahāgaja · talk 16:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.