Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audric Dandres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Audric Dandres[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Refs in article aren’t in-depth independent secondary sources. I searched for sources: only one I found that appeared to have some content about him was an alumni source, so not independent/reliable. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, France, and Italy. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing does not rise to the level of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

https://www.thestar.com/life/food_wine/advice/2018/05/25/treat-yourself-to-five-wines-that-taste-as-good-as-they-look.html

https://ricerca.gelocal.it/tribunatreviso/archivio/tribunatreviso/2015/01/14/NZ_23_01.html

the two sources linked in fiol prosecco page about audric are independent...

Thanks Iamyouaresheis (talk) 09:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.