Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1979–80 Auburn Tigers men's basketball team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. $Salvio giuliano$ 21:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1979–80 Auburn Tigers men's basketball team[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect was challenged as a "controversial redirect", when the article is solely sourced by 2 database entries. Fails WP:GNG as written, should have remained a redirect or drafted so it might be developed, but that's not longer an option. Also fails WP:NSEASONS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Alabama. Skynxnex (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Don't have time at the moment to do a fuller analysis, but the same points I raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1980–81 Auburn Tigers men's basketball team and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1981–82 Auburn Tigers men's basketball team likely apply here as well. Cbl62 (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Like the other two seasons Cbl62 mentioned, there are plenty of sources for this one: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. There are almost certainly more, since Newspapers.com had pages and pages of results, but that alone is enough to pass GNG. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 17:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is no high-major school that should not have every season article created. They all get major press all year long.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.