User talk:Urhixidur/Archive/2013

Continuation of List of Minor Planets[edit]

Hi, I'm a user from the Chinese Wikipedia. I am basically the only person in charge of transferring List of Minor Planets subpages from English to Chinese. (Most of it is translated) The list stopped at 215000 or so, while the actual NASA database has up to 350441. I'm curious as to whether you will continue the list, as it benefits more than just en.wiki. Below are the details of my work there.

Ever since 2007 (maybe 08) I've been contributing the List of Minor Planets (It's still called ...Asteroids in zh.wiki). In 2009 I turned 15, and finally got an account with bot status specifically dedicated to this list. There were only about 15000 objects listed then, so I added ALL the other pages till 215000. Without knowing how to automate the data transfer from the database to Wikipedia, I could only write a program translating and reformatting the English version. The last few thousand objects (approx. 215000) are added by an Indonesian user, who seems to be passionate yet inexperienced. I'd love to see the list expanded to catch up with the rate of cataloging.

Here's my Chinese user page: zh:User:Yinweichen and my bot's: zh:User:Yinweichen-bot. I'd love to collaborate with you on this, so please drop a few comments. Thanks! Yinweichen (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I really need to get back to this. Thanks for the reminder. Urhixidur (talk) 12:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad this is still on your mind. Please leave a message at my talk page whenever you have made an addition. Yinweichen (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Abraham for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Abraham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Abraham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 17:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Northwest Territories[edit]

Please refrain from making edits to fully-protected pages, such as the one to Template:Country data Northwest Territories, without first consulting the talk page, and garnering consensus for the proposed changes. Edits like these are abuse of the administrator editing privileges. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sievert[edit]

Please consider reading Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science#Sievert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.21.43.22 (talk) 10:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same issue is in the article Relative biological effectiveness. In fact, the same table is present in about 4 articles. Is it necessary? That's probably what I mean. Abd by the way QF for photons is 1 only for low energies. Should it be mentioned anywhere? -- 217.21.43.22 (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of minor planets/78401–78500 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor planets/78401–78500 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor planets/78401–78500 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Professorjohnas (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of minor planets/78501–78600 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor planets/78501–78600 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor planets/78501–78600 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Professorjohnas (talk) 13:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

la page tabarnak[edit]

Veuillez voir la page tabarnak. Je n'ai jamais entendu [tɑɔ.bar.nak]. C'est Wikitiki89 qui n'arrête pas d'écrire [tɑɔ.bar.nak], il est américain. J'espère que vous pouvez le corriger. Merci. 198.105.121.83 (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dernièrement, Wikitiki89 a écrit /tɑː.bar.nak/ encore. Cette prononciation n'existe pas. J'ai déjà entendu [ta.baʁ.nak], [ta.bar.nak], [tæ.bæʁ.næk] et [tæ.bær.næk], mais pas [tɑː.bar.nak] ou [tɑɔ.bar.nak]. Si Wikitiki89 écrira encore /tɑː.bar.nak/ une autre fois, il faut que vous lui parlera. 198.105.121.83 (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cette IP est l'utilisateur User:Fête qui a obtenu un blocage global (voir wikt:fr:Discussion utilisateur:Fête). Je vous recommande de lui bloquer.
En ce qui concerne la prononciation de tabarnak, j'ai entendu quelquechose comme /tɑː.bar.nak/ ou [tɑɔ.bar.nak] à Montréal (peut-être ce n'est pas très fréquent?). J'ai modifié la section de prononciation encore. Si vous n'êtes pas d'accord encore, on peut en discuter sur ma page de discussion sur Wiktionary. Merci beaucoup. --- Wikitiki89 (talk) - 20:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peut-être que /tɑ.baʁ.nak/ est possible, mais je n'ai jamais entendu. 198.105.121.83 (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]