User talk:Rogerthat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

`Leave me a message by clicking here.

See also:

Editor review[edit]

Thankyou for your comment Rogerthat, but I was wondering what kind of argument you were referring to. A disagreements of viewpoints, but an argument? Regards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 05:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images from Wikimedia Commons[edit]

I noticed some AFL player articles no longer show a player photo. Has there been some change to the AFL player template that's changed photo behaviour? The photo will display if it is referenced outside the template. Diverman 07:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the reply - hopefully the Template:Infobox afl player will be fixed soon. Diverman 22:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grant Smilie[edit]

A tag has been placed on Grant Smilie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Grant Smilie is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Grant Smilie. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.--DCAnderson 05:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would kindly ask that you not call me an "idiot" or anything I do as "bullshit". SeeWP:Civil and WP:NPA. I'm sorry if I'm not more familiar with Australian Pop music, but the article gave no citations and nothing linked to it at the time except for an article about a college. Frankly, I'm not psychic, and if he had a number one hit there is no way for me to tell from reading the article.--DCAnderson 12:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New ACOTF[edit]

Australian Football Hall of Fame has been selected as the new Australian collaboration. As you voted for it, please help to improve the article in any way you can. Scott Davis Talk 14:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rogerthat. I have started a proposal at Portal talk:Australia for an inclusion of an anniversary/on this day section to be displayed on the portal. If you are interested in this making this happen, you can comment there or go to the anniversary pages and adding in things that you consider to be notable. (I don't know which AFL players are the most notable in history, so you might want to add their birthdays/deaths, etc). Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:AFL : Anthony Appleyard[edit]

A couple of questions[edit]

I have just a couple of questions, just out of curiosity, because i'm not sure i understand the reasoning behind two of your edits. Is there any particular reason you put the link to Victorian Premier Cricket on the Victorian Premier League page, but not vice versa? And why was Peter Moore redirected from 'australain rules footballer' to just 'footballer'? I don't mean to sound accusational, just asking, thanks Blackmissionary 10:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One more question[edit]

Ok, thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. Just one more. You added a 'category' for the williamstown userbox i created, and i just wanted to know how that's done so i can add one to one of my other userboxes. thanks Blackmissionary 05:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I've made quite a few changes. Would you like to give it a look over? - Richardcavell 03:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your message. I just read the WP:AFL page but I'm still not quite sure whether any specialised tasks will be assigned on me if I joined this WP. You know...I currently live in Hong Kong and it's quite hard to follow the footy news here. It might be difficult for me to do frequent contributions or edits on AFL-related pages here.

Your answer will be appreciated. Thanks! Celticshk 09:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Atlanticpuffin4.jpg Hello Rogerthat. Thank you for gracious statement in my Editor review, as although you did not participate in the my RfA, it was quoted by many RfA participants and strongly contributed to the overwhelming and flattering result in my RfA of (160/1/0), and leaves me in a position of having to live up to a high standard of community expectation. If you need help with admin related tasks, feel free to ask me - and of course, if I make any procedural mistakes, feel free to point them out. Of course, I look forward to working with you in the future. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, adverts by the candidate aren't allowed, so I didn't lobby you. Also, you can keep up do date with RfA by using User:Blnguyen/RFA summary and pasting the code into a page of your choice. I really think you should keep up to date with this, as admins are there to facilitate the conditions for building the encyclopedia, so writers like yourself should take a keen interest in who is selected to administer WP. Admins shouldn't be elected by other admins - it's not a closed social club!. On that note, Richardcavell who you have been in contact with is up, so you may want to participate
Also, you may be interested in Sam Vimes2. Another article writer under attack.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought I had an account, but I guess not. I checked out WikiProject AFL, I'll try to add things every so often.

I'm a Bombers supporter too, tough times right now. I watched the whole game last night and didn't rip my guernsey off in anger.

Thanks for the invitation.[edit]

Let me know if there is anything in particular that I can help with. Cheers! --Folajimi 22:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm coming back[edit]

Hey. Just though I'd drop you a line saying I've just about run dry on articles to work on in my other WikiProjects so I'm going to get stuck right into the AFL Drafts over these coming holidays which start this Saturday for me. I feel kind of bad because you sent me a message a few months back saying you thought the project was getting somewhere and then you didn't here from me again as far as AFL edits were concerned so I think its about time I made it up to you. Normy 11:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey mate

I noticed that recently two ip addresses made changes to the Nathan Van Berlo page that I created a week or two ago. (see here)

I was wondering if I could delete these edits, as I don't believe either contribute to this article, as it seems to be talking about an actor. I was wondering if you knew anything about these comments, otherwise I will delete them from the page.

Thanks, Jasrocks 23:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I appreciatew the friendly invite but those edits I made yesterday on various AFL stadium stubs were only because of my involvement with the stub sorting Wikiproject. I'm afraid that when I think AFL, I think of Arena football not Aussie football. Caerwine Caerwhine 13:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Rogerthat. Can you have a look at this page please? A user has told that because his Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelaide University Lacrosse Club got deleted, then this should also be deleted. I disagree, as it was a VFL club, and thus was in the top level of Australian Rules at the time, but the user thinks that the VFL doesn't count. Many thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 02:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC).Reply[reply]

List of football converts listed for deletion[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of football converts, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football converts. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-- I@ntalk 03:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Grapes05.jpg

Hello Rogerthat, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 17:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Serial Pest Footage[edit]

Check this site for footage

http://www.hawkmoore.blogspot.com/

AUSTEN TAYSHUS[edit]

Mate, There are many,many mistakes in what you've written.In fact it is also rather condescending and peurile.All the correct information is on my website,or at sandy gutman,on imdb.com.My mobile is ...

Roger, I've begun a discussion with Alex/Sandy/Austen and I've invited him to tell us what he's not happy with. I'm more than happy to adjust the article so that it is factually correct. - Richardcavell 02:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have just produced this page Please feel free to edit. Lentisco 05:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Somewhere in the porridge of my mind I have read somewhere that Smallhorn was the last VFL player to kick a 'place' kick. Any ideas on this bit of trivia? Lentisco 03:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aussie Rules[edit]

Thanks for that reminder, I will in future remember that AFL is not a sport! :P JRA WestyQld2 09:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess that means I'll have to watch the Friday night game of Aussie Rules... maybe ;) JRA WestyQld2 12:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New article[edit]

Hey Rogerthat, thought you'd be interested in the new Australian Football League rewrite. I have made Australian Football League/New article so we can rewrite it. Cheers, Jasrocks (talk) 09:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I shifted it to User:Jasrocks/Australian Football League, coz you're not meant to make subpages like that off the main article (futurama did it!). Yer maybe I should start from stratch. Still got three weeks holidays. Jasrocks (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
BTW, can u think of any articles that we can nominate for the version 1.0? Jasrocks (talk) 11:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Noticed that :P. That means that alot of my articles will be scaled back. Like I said, i'll be nominating the clubs and also the sport and major league(s). Jasrocks (talk) 11:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changes to Essendon FC Page[edit]

FYI. I fixed the entries for http://wiki.alquds.edu/?query=Essendon_Football_Club#Champions_of_Essendon as I had noticed that a couple nuffs had added their names to the list of 25 Champions of Essendon, conveniently putting themselves 2nd and 2nd last in the hope that no one would notice. I compared the wiki list to that at http://www.essendonfc.com.au/champions/. I've also fixed a couple other (vandal) errors. (Ash73 01:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Hey,

Thanks for putting in the dob and other info. Just wondering where you got it from. I didn't know anything about him until I did a google search (he played for the Crows before I was born).

Cheers, Jasrocks (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AFL on Wikipedia[edit]

Thanks for your message. I would love to join the Wikipedia AFL Project and help out in any way I can. I look forward to improving all the articles related to AFL on Wikipedia, Thanks themit 09:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Wagga Wagga[edit]

Rogerthat, a new editor User:Steveswain has been inserting Wagga Wagga as the birthplace of various footballers and sportspeople such as Leigh Matthews, Dermott Brereton, Tony Lockett, Drew Morphett, and Royce Hart. I asked him to cite sources but he seemed to stop posting after that. I have no idea if these edits are correct or not but some seemed bogus so I reverted all of them. Since you are the Aussie sports guy, I thought you might be able to take a look and revert me if they are indeed correct. Thanks mate. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One quick question[edit]

I'd love to join I'm just having a problem adding my name to the list of participants. What exactly do I do once I get to this page? Cheers in advance and good luck to the Bombers tonight

Thanks for the welcome[edit]

Thanks for the message mate. I am new to Wikipedia (as a contributor)and as a Port Adelaide fan have a few more things to add/update once I get a feel for how this all works.

Cheers - User:Super Impose

Yep, thanks for my message too, I'm a long-time supporter of the Hawks, but a member only since I moved to Melbourne 6 years ago. Only a minor WP contributor, but use it a lot for initial reference material. RoscoHead 00:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AFL[edit]

How do I join that AFL porject?

I want to help out, and get it going strong... But Im having some troubles.

Thanks for the Message anyway! :D --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Braydeneatme (talkcontribs)

Help[edit]

I have made some changes/updates to the Mark Williams page but not sure how to update the title which appears as Mark M. Williams.

Was hoping to change it to Mark Melville "Choco" Williams...can you help?

In case you are wondering Melville is truely his middle name!

Regards --Super Impose 12:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you Ben?[edit]

Done a little bit of backtracking - are you SEN's 'own' Ben from Sunbury? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoever06 (talkcontribs)

Still having trouble...[edit]

I add my name to the list, but I am unsure that is right... Can you please help or fix it up. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Braydeneatme (talkcontribs)

Userpages[edit]

What are you up to? Creating user pages for lots of users who only edit for a couple of days, and who don't appear to have ever communicated with you? - brenneman {L} 05:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, it just looked odd. Thanks for your reply. - brenneman {L} 12:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, just wondering if you could copyedit the Martin Mattner article. I'm ambious and am hoping to make it a featured article some day. Any small edits would be great, but can you also tell me which sections need to be expanding. I'm also imagining that you havent fixed the pic in the infobox yet. Cheers, Jasrocks Talk 11:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Rogerthat.

You messaged me about joining a Wikipedia AFL project. I love my footy but not that interested to join so I'll just keep adding in information here and there on AFL to keep your website running.

Cheers.

AFL/VFL premiers list[edit]

I have changed the "top 4 clubs" on the list to "the last 10 seasons". this shows the top clubs over the last 10 years as opposed to all time which is misleading as of recent form. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Australian Football League premiers if you want to change your opposition towards the article. Cheers --AFL45 10:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club was actually not created until after the Power joined the AFL. There is a clear mix of the information with Magarey Medal's only being from the new club but premierships and most of the article still being about the Port Adelaide Football Club. I'm happy to fix the information just let me know which way you want me to go. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbo. (talkcontribs)

barnstar[edit]

Barnstar-goldrun7.png The Running Man Barnstar
For you tireless work to improve coverage of sportspeople, sports and sports broadcasters on wikipedia.Blnguyen | rant-line 05:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your message. I'll contribute and help out wherever possible. GregP1 23:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi hi[edit]

hi there, i think im making a mess of all the talks here,. not quite getting it yet, but thanks for the info about the AFL pages, im just worried i might make a mistake in what i can and cant contribute... having some trouble understanding the instructions on this site.

cheers! pdragon

AFL welcome template broken[edit]

Hi Rogerthat. You may have noticed a few mistaken edits to {{Wpafl2}} from myself of late. The reason for this is, the template is somehow broken. When it's pasted to talk pages, the edit link does not allow an editor to edit the talk page concerned, but rather takes the editor onto editing the template itself. See User talk:Devoindahouse for an example, and click the edit link at the header of your AFL template to see what occurs. -- Longhair 09:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure. I gave it a glance, and couldn't see a reason why it's failing like that. Perhaps share the problem with your project members. There's some cluey types around here. If you wan't I'll have another look in an hour or so and see what I can work out if the problem still exists. -- Longhair 10:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think I've fixed it by removing the section headers. When using the template, perhaps take the time to create your own sections, as I think this was leading to the edit problem. Give it a try and see how she goes. -- Longhair 10:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I no longer live in Geelong, and pretty much gave up on those Cats a while back mate, circa '89. The problem's solved for now. It may look a little messy where you've already used the template, but that won't bring the moon crashing down or anything soon. Sorry I had to make so many mistakes to realise there was a problem. :) -- Longhair 10:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Looks nice, and serves the purpose well. Glad I could help and give you motivation to enhance it a little. Remember '89 at all? So close, so bloody close, yet still so far away... Football discussion stopped for me around about then and I've not been to a game since if I recall. -- Longhair 10:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was an awesome game. You just had to see it live to feel the pain I guess. So you never saw many of the greats play? I've kinda lost touch with modern footy, hence my only AFL contributions being kinda old hat. I was almost 18 when that game kicked off. Old enough to take it hard :) -- Longhair 10:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I saw Peter Bosustow take that awesome mark, which I still don't believe. Was sitting all of 10 metres from where it happened. Ahh, the old football days, when we used to take in as much beer as we needed, and seats, well, what seats? -- Longhair 11:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the redirect. I'd actually edited Bosustow's article myself and had forgotten it existed. There must be an image of that mark someplace about I'm sure? -- Longhair 11:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey mate,

Im just having some trouble with an ip address about the quality of some information in this article.

'Stop deleting true shit from Nathan's page. His nickname IS Dill and it is true that no one knows why. And he DID star as the guru in the search for the holy grail. Look it up on youtube.'

I dont really think that the information is needed on Wikipedia but im just asking you.

Cheers, Jason

Photos from the Sydney reserve and first grade grand finals[edit]

As it happens, I took some photos at the grand finals (though I was late arriving for the reserve grade game). I've posted what I regard as the best of them on flickr, at

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30573547@N00/sets/72157594282128766/ ; and http://www.flickr.com/photos/30573547@N00/sets/72157594282141318/

If you could use any of them, then drop me a line and I'll upload 'em to Wikipedia or wherever (depending on usage). Or you can just reference the low-res stuff from flickr.

Maybe they're of some use...

  ...Mike ( Mike Funnell 12:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC) )Reply[reply]


==Please revert Collingwood page-its been vandalised. Thanks.== Lentisco

Thanks anyway...[edit]

(Just in response to the comment you posted on my talk page.) Ummm, actually, I'm already a part of wikiproject afl! But thankyou anyway.Teebs101 06:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Peaeri43.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Peaeri43.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

St Kilda Football Club 2006 playing list[edit]

St Kilda Football Club 2006 playing list is a pretty useless article. Why did you copy and paste it? The squad doesn't even correspond with the one found in St. Kilda Football Club. Punkmorten 12:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh my... Punkmorten 08:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for that cool West Coast tag[edit]

G'day mate, just wanted to say thanks for adding that West Coast Eagles Premiers tag on my user page. I like it a lot. The Kasparov of Sheshbesh 02:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Stephen Peak.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Peak.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 04:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Australian rules footballer infobox[edit]

I have started a very basic adaptation of the soccer infobox, just wanted to see if you'd like to make any suggestions... Template:Australian rules footballer infobox--Hack 11:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry this is a bit belated, but I just noticed this article when searching on Phil Matson. This team is not an "official" team (e.g. nominated by the SANFL or even a newspaper). It is the opinion (albeit a learned one) of John Devaney, the owner of FullPointsFooty [1]. In the parent article he describes the ten lists he prepared as "... selections, which are based primarily on achievements rather than reputation, are purely personal, and are sure to provoke disagreement." I am not sure that the article really belongs in Wikipedia in its current form? I am not aware of the SANFL declaring a Team of the Century, and the next closest I can find is The Advertiser newspaper's Silver Jubilee team [2] Your views? Cheers. Pudgey 06:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wasn't aware of Richie Benaud's Greatest XI ... which seems in the same vein, except that he released a commercial DVD of his personal choices. Anyway I was raising it with you as it is an article you started. I can see an argument that with no other TOTC for the SANFL then John Devaney's is as good a starting point as any. Next time I am editing I may just clarify the article though if that's OK with you. Pudgey 06:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

included Dianomd-Cutter.org link at Michael Roach per discussion we still had and User:HumanDas' requirements of inlcusion[edit]

When we had the discussion about including the critical link mainly User:HumanDas and user:Ekajati were against it. All other editors were for including or at least not against it. Because user.HumanDas argued:

I am happy to include a critical link - as long as the publishers of the site have the balls to put their names on it. I can create a site that trashes you in a few moments work (if I knew your identity) - would you want that information then linked to by WP? —Hanuman Das 23:36, 24 September 2006 (UTC) (see archive2)

I now inlclude the link and the responsible person, because the website owner gives his name on the website, see: http://www.diamond-cutter.org/about/about.html Regards, --Kt66 12:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Paddlepoplion.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paddlepoplion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mirrool - Where Billy Brownless booted a ball over the silos[edit]

Hi there Rogerthat - I thought this page (just commenced by me with a great reference added to by Mattinbgn) with accompanying photographs might tickle your Aussie Rules fancy? --VS talk...images 08:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

wikiproject[edit]

hi there can jus please gimme some explanation about crcket wiki project. i would love to be a part of this project so please do the needful. Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Silence speaks (talkcontribs) 07:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Image:FedSqAusvCroatia.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FedSqAusvCroatia.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 05:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help fom a newbie.[edit]

Hi mate,

I'm desperate. I'm sending you this message as I don't know where to start, and I need some immediate guidance from an old hand.

I am new to Wikipedia and I have a lot of information to contribute to a particular topic The two topics are the town of Sunbury and the Sunbury Music Festival as well of information on the Victorian Goldfields. As I have been a local for over 30 years I have a lot of historical information to offer.

But I need to know how I need to apply for the Wiki Melbourne project. I look forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by stevefrommelbourne (talkcontribs)

My AFL ladder[edit]

Hi, Just wanted to know want you think about this: AFL Ladder 2007 and 2007 VFL season. Stats Fanatic 06:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi again, Decided to make AFL Ladder 2007 a template, since it said it was unencyclopedic. What do u think on this? Stats Fanatic 07:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Creating CFC Grand Finals article[edit]

In order to expand the information on the Carlton Football Club wiki page I've added an honours board. However since the history is so long, the page size is starting to get too big. I think the Grand Final teams list could be hosted on a separate wiki page, but I'm not really sure on notability, or what to title the page. Any ideas? Orichalcon 14:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've moved all the Grand Final teams to their own page at Carlton Football Club premierships and added a reference on the main CFC page. I dunno if that page name is all it could be.
Another thing, I'm struggling to find any information on the internet regarding the first names of the Presidents of the club. I got the information for everything else, but all sites that have the presidents simply have their first names initialled. Any ideas where I could get that info? Orichalcon 05:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Living people[edit]

I hope you are not offended that the edit at Selwood and Headland was changed. I am certainly not questioning your good faith or diligence in updating the pages, but it is probably better to say too little, rather than too much. The whole business is pretty distasteful, perhaps this guided the curious ruling by the tribunal. There is little room for edification, particuarly given our strict policies on biographies of living people. As the editor says, let us leave speculation to the media. I hope you don't see this censorship, I'm just trying to be objective about what is already an emotive area. Best regards, Fred 12:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Phew, cheers mate. The media's baying is probably the most distasteful part of all. Nice to meet another aus editor. If you need a western australian editor, let me know. I afraid I don't much about football though, but I'll be happy to help with anything else. Again, best regards Fred 12:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TAC cup team pages[edit]

Hi,
I started the articles for the Bendigo Pioneers, Dandenong Stingrays, Eastern Ranges, Gippsland Power, Northern Knights, Oakleigh Chargers and Sandringham Dragons. Feel free to add more info.
I might also upload the logos of the teams above and add them to the above articles.
Stats Fanatic 08:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Let It Be (song) from the Beatle album 1[edit]

You should be informed that overdubs were recorded for the Let It Be single on January 1970 so the 1970 end date for the recording of the Beatle compilation album 1 stands. Steelbeard1 14:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Bob Radford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tyrenius 23:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:AFL - Player Profiles[edit]

G'day, I posted on the project page but I didnt get a response, and you seemed to be the guy to ask. I'm going to start putting some player profiles on wikipedia, and I wanted to know what the criteria for inclusion was. Many people have only played 1 game and I didn't know if they deserved an entire article or not. Terlob 04:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

episode article review notice[edit]

Information.svg The individual episode articles for 20 to 1 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:20 to 1#Episode review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notability of Mike Williamson[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mike Williamson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.164.135.238 16:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mark Doran[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Mark Doran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Spa toss 19:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mark Beretta.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mark Beretta.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 01:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Franco Cozzo[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Franco Cozzo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Jeepday (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Taking the article off of the article space to User:Rogerthat/Franco Cozzo is fine, it can live there until you are ready to fix it up. As long as it on your user space you can remove the {{prod}} and {{unreferenced}}, you may also want to remove the {{stub}}. Based on the text of the current version I think the article is not likely to meet WP:BIO removing the tags will take it out of fix it categories. I found the article while working Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles. Jeepday (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sydney Reserve Grade Grand Final[edit]

I was at the game, taking photos (the son of a friend of mine was playing for the Eagles).

I've posted them in a flickr set. Have a look and, if there are any you can use, ask and I can upload them for you (just identify the shots by the title in flickr).

Mike Funnell 05:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RfD nomination of Franco Cozzo[edit]

I have nominated Franco Cozzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Remy B 12:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


South Australian Team of the Century[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article South Australian Team of the Century, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of South Australian Team of the Century. Crickettragic (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Craig White (guitarist), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Craig White (guitarist) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Craig White (guitarist), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Smfc.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smfc.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1675149 autopilotoff 200x200.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:1675149 autopilotoff 200x200.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Russell Gilbert[edit]

I see you have a history of working on the article Russell Gilbert. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. BirgitteSB 19:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Afl[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Afl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:2006 AFL season/Ladder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nick Bennett[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nick Bennett, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tricky_Wiki44 (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheWinners1.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TheWinners1.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image source problem with Image:OAbrahamsFitz.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:OAbrahamsFitz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Joel Selwood FA nomination[edit]

Hey there,

As a regular contributor to Australian rules football articles, you're invited to wander down and express your opinion toward this article's current FA nomination here. If successful, it will be our first AFL-related article to gain FA status. Cheers! Boomtish (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Rogerthat, for some reason this template appears to be broken, at least for past players. I'm doing a bit of work on the Ben Graham article and, even if I get the player number from the GFC website, the link goes to Gary Ablett.

Cheers, Reyk YO! 08:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of SBS Television[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article SBS Television, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This information can be found on SBS's main page, as well as SBS One and SBS Two respectively.

We can merge this information to the Main SBS page as well as the SBS One and SBS Two pages

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Gross. Advertize (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research[edit]

Rogerthat,

Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.

This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.


Take the survey


Thank you!

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.


CMUResearcher (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NowCommons: File:CnrRussellandLonsdale.jpg[edit]

File:CnrRussellandLonsdale.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Corner Russell Street Lonsdale Street.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Corner Russell Street Lonsdale Street.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mark Bolton (disambiguation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bolton (disambiguation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Information.svg Hello Rogerthat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 42 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,789 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Sean Wellman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  2. Stephen Wallis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  3. Rod Butterss - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  4. Nicholas Smith (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  5. Ian Roberts (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  6. Ian Johnson (businessman) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  7. Ken Sheldon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  8. David Pittman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  9. Peter Prescott - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL
  10. Matt Rendell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfD nomination of Matt Tilley[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Matt Tilley. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Tilley (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Afl-project[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Afl-project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. The-Pope (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Sarita Stella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of World Sport Overnight for deletion[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A discussion has begun about whether the article World Sport Overnight, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Sport Overnight until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Clanger (Australian rules football) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clanger (Australian rules football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clanger (Australian rules football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thomas Roach[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Thomas Roach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate Page of http://wiki.alquds.edu/?query=Tom_Roach_%28footballer%29

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bentogoa (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Jules Lund for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jules Lund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jules Lund until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup[edit]

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 02:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)Reply[reply]

February Melbourne Meetup[edit]

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Robert Mascara for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Mascara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Mascara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Louis Epstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bulwersator (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Melbourne meetup[edit]

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sexpo[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sexpo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jprg1966 (talk) 01:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

File:Benny c melb.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benny c melb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NSWToCBunton.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source problem with File:NSWToCBunton.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:NSWToCBunton.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source problem with File:Roy cazaly.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Roy cazaly.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Poppy King for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poppy King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppy King until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source problem with File:Peaeri43.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Peaeri43.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source problem with File:Cazalyp.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Cazalyp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Jo Silvagni for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jo Silvagni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Silvagni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global account[edit]

Hi Rogerthat! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Musical note nicu bucule 01.svg

Nomination of Sy Kravitz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sy Kravitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sy Kravitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Bradley Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 20:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Julian de Stoop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf(talk) 10:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Gerard Dowling for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerard Dowling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Dowling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notice

The file File:Murray Carbonaro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"'Heroes'" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 'Heroes'. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 29#'Heroes' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steve Wallis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dorsetonian (talk) 22:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrew Daddo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Biel 00:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]