User talk:Rfowler416

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to British Isles, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ulster Defence Association seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue, respectfully, that the original text was less than neutral, in that it described an entity designated as a terrorist group by it's own government and the governments of every major country in the world as "a paramilitary group", saying they "patrolled areas and held marches and rallies" without mentioning the hundreds of deaths and injuries attributed to, again, a TERRORIST GROUP. Clearly neutrality is not the goal here. 24.91.140.135 (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Fred Toettcher ‎. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Black Kite (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did absolutely no such thing. What false or defamatory information did I add? Wikipedia is almost entirely unreferenced. Rfowler416 (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Hazelton, you may be blocked from editing. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That information is in no way defamatory. It's less than flattering, but it's not defamatory. Rebecca Hazelton defamed her own character. Rfowler416 (talk) 01:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BLP policy applies to talk pages as well. If you cannot cite a reliable source, you must stop adding defamatory material to any part of Wikipedia. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cited the Boston Globe, which I would think is a reputable enough source. I'm sorry if I didn't do it correctly, but I'm happy to link to the article if you'd like. Your response is unwarranted unjust. Rfowler416 (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here is your edit. It does not cite any source in any format. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]