User talk:Piramitdünya

May 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Talk:Pyramid. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

A summary of some guidelines you don't seem to be aware of

• "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
• Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments. Talk pages are for how to improve the article within the guidelines.
• Always cite a source for any new information to articles, using <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). Numerology, paranoid confusion of common symbols, and other fringe beliefs are not accepted as reliable sources.
• Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

https://www.efs-survey.com/uc/wikimediasurvey/ospe.php3?SES=dfed0ed6269df14692fa87c2691fb9fa&syid=31658&sid=31659&act=start&js=13&flash=1001 http://www.wikipediaresearch.org/wiki/FAQ

August 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Number of the Beast, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is NOT a forum for you to spam nonsense on. Either make a coherent statement that works within the guidelines given above (with the intention of article improvement) or go somewhere else and start a blog there. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)