After discussion the RfC has been reorganized into "support", "oppose," and "neutral" subsections with numbered lists instead of * lists, and a "RfC discussion" subsection. A numbered list didn't work right with your two paragraph changes, they broke the numbering, so I changed the syntax of those paragraph changes from a new line and : to </p><p>. Is this acceptable? --Kizor 01:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi. Yeah, no problem, it looks fine. Thank you for refactoring. Must have been a gigantic job. Melmann 12:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It would've been manageable without fixing the problems I made for myself. But thank you, that makes it an "aye" from everyone I contacted, which is a load off my back. --Kizor 04:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi there, last week you commented on the Robert Rubin Talk page, giving a thumbs up to my edit request and suggesting I implement it directly. As I explained there, out of an abundance of caution I don't make direct edits to pages where I have a financial COI. I appreciate that you're cool with it, but not all editors are. (I've seen warning tags added to pages where someone made even a very small edit.) In case you're willing to make the change, I had replied with very simple copy-and-paste markup language for the change. Would you be willing to take another look at it? Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 19:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
