User talk:Mdriver1981
Welcome[edit]
|
Your Edits to Harry Potter articles[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article.
John Reaves 03:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Your Reversion of Deleted Content at Minor Dark wizards in Harry Potter[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
John Reaves 04:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
My reply[edit]
I've replied on my talk page. John Reaves 04:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Have you black listed me?Mdriver1981 04:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Page blanking[edit]
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Alby Grant. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- You can go ahead and do a rewrite but please do it in place. It's not customary for us to delete articles simply because the original author no longer likes it. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
A Patriot's History[edit]
Looking through Wikipedia to see what it had regarding Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen, I found little. One thing I did find, however, was an article for which you are almost entirely responsible that cites A Patriot's History. I'm curious as to whu you chose that particular text for your citation. Do you like the book? JStripes (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:June 27, 2008 008.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:June 27, 2008 008.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Dr. Hoffman.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Dr. Hoffman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of AR2 (TV Series)[edit]
I have nominated AR2 (TV Series), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AR2 (TV Series). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Drazen.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Drazen.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Drazen.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Drazen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
April 2009[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Life on Mars (U.S. TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. mhking (talk) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
May 2009[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Zack de la Rocha. Thank you. Skomorokh 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Zack de la Rocha. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Skomorokh 00:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Alby Grant 1.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Alby Grant 1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Homosexuals Anonymous[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Homosexuals Anonymous, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Articloe currently does not indicate any Notability - specfically claim it is a "Relatively small program". Also reads like an advert due to the inclusions of Non NPOV steps currently counting for 2/3th of the content of the article.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 12:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Homosexuals Anonymous[edit]
A tag has been placed on Homosexuals Anonymous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Homosexuals Anonymous[edit]
A tag has been placed on Homosexuals Anonymous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 12:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Warren Boyd.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Warren Boyd.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Warren Boyd.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Warren Boyd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Keith Olbermann[edit]
Long-fought consensus on the Keith Olbermann page is to not include any personal interpretation of his political leanings unless he declares as such. Since Olbermann has denied being a liberal, consensus is against using original research to define him.
This is the same policy in effect on other pages such as Sean Hannity, in which he is described as a conservative (his self-designation) and not a neo-con. If you disagree, please open up a discussion on the talk page and try and change the consensus. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Apologies[edit]
I should have given you time to finish the edits on the Frasier episode page. Apologies. Frmatt (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nikki McKibbin[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nikki McKibbin. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki McKibbin. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Freddy Krueger[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Freddy Krueger, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Freddy Krueger, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Your original edit, which compared FvJ to Soviet censorship, was original research. That comparison is not explicit in the film itself, it is your own personal observation. To include it in the article, you need to find a reliable source which discusses the similarity. When I reverted your edit, with an edit summary explaining why, you refused to discuss the issue and began edit warring. When myself and Bignole continued to revert you, you made abusive comments toward Bignole on the article talk page. Your behaviour has been uncivil and unconstructive; either discuss the issue politely on the article talk page, or accept that your edits were unsuitable. Paul 730 00:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I do not take threats idly. I disagree that any of my comments were "abusive", they were simply constructive criticisms, not character flaws. You and your friend decided that my edits were "original research" and I disagreed, which I have the right to do. I do have rights on Wikipedia. Something is obviously on your mind, something is making you so mad, something that is not me, perhaps it is the loss of your empire. - Mdriver1981 (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Paline 2.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Paline 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Beardsley.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Beardsley.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Julie & Julia[edit]
Hi there. I think you just left a talk page comment on the main page of Julie & Julia, just so you know. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 19:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
List of NOVA episodes[edit]
I have reverted your recent edits to the List of NOVA episodes which were not constructive: you removed episodes that belong in the list, you added episodes that were already in the list, you added production codes that you clearly made up, and you left the table broken. If you need assistance editing this list, please ask for help on the articles talk page or on my own talk page. Sarilox (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Mdriver1981! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Gérard Watkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Warren Eckstein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Olly_3.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Olly_3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Is it really that important? - Mdriver1981 (talk) 21:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Sober House[edit]
Please do not add original research to articles, such as this edit of yours to Sober House. Original research refers to material obtained through personal knowledge, or unpublished syntheses of previously published material, rather than material that is supported by reliable, verifiable sources. Please make sure you cite a reliable source for all of the information you add or re-add to articles. You can learn how to do this at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Nightscream (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
The article A Mid-Winter Night's Dream (Frasier episode) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent reliable sources, not notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (films) criteria.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
The article A Mid-Winter Night's Dream (Frasier episode) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. See also: WP:NOT.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 03:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated A Mid-Winter Night's Dream (Frasier episode), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Mid-Winter Night's Dream (Frasier episode). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw[edit]
I have nominated Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EuroPride (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
July 2010[edit]
I've reverted your addition of the trivia re: the Booker T song in the article for Memphis Beat. While such observations may be interesting to you, they are not necessarily notable, nor in this case, have you provided a source, which makes it original research. If you feel strongly that the edit should be included, please discuss on the talk page and gain consensus rather than simply reverting, which risks starting an edit war. Drmargi (talk) 20:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
August 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Eureka (TV series), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Pete303.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Pete303.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Olly 2.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Olly 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 05:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
November 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Roller derby are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. It's... MR BERTY! talk/stalk 21:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
I've tagged this image for deletion for missing evidence of permission. Just because an image is available on the web in a public place doesn't mean it's free of copyright. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew[edit]
Hi. Thanks for working to improve the article with your edit, but I think we need a more specific source than just the name of the TV show (like the episode in question), especially given the nature of Peniche's statements about McCready. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Edit summary[edit]
Hey there MD. Don't forget to use edit summaries. Thanks! Basket of Puppies 12:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Frasier episodes to consider creating[edit]
I have been spending a lot of time lately creating and modifying templates for critically acclaimed episode articles. You have already created "The Two Mrs. Cranes (Frasier episode)" and "Space Quest (Frasier)". It has come to my attention that two of the most critically acclaimed episodes in television history are Frasier episodes entitled "The Matchmaker (Frasier)" and "Merry Christmas, Mrs. Moskowitz that need to be created. They both appear on {{WritersGuildofAmericaEpisodicComedyScreenplay 1995–2009}}. The former apperas on {{EmmyAward ComedyDirector 1976–2000}}, while the latter appears on {{EmmyAward ComedyWriting 1976–2000}}. You may also note several other critically acclaimed Frasier episodes at Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Directing for a Comedy Series, Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series, Writers Guild of America Award for Best Screenplay - Episodic Comedy and Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Comedy Series that were either nominees or winners. You may want to consider creating some of those as well.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Your question about "Teutonic" in the Mad Men characters page[edit]
I know it has been a long time since you asked, but I thought I would respond just for your information. In English, "Teutonic" means not only "relating to the Teuton tribe," it also means "having the stereotypic characteristics of Germanic people," such as lack of humor, stern manner, strict discipline, etc. Acsenray (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Green Berets (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Bloods (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Hermann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
File:June 24, 2008 009.JPG missing description details[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Pawn Stars[edit]
Hi. Please do not add superfluous, unsourced or POV argumentation to articles, as you did with this edit to Pawn Stars. Participants on all reality shows are prearranged, and involve staging that they do not disclose, as this is not unique to Pawn Stars This is already mentioned in that section, and supported by a cited source, and does not require additional comment that clearly conveys an argumentative tone.
Also, the word discourse is a mass noun, not a count noun. Nightscream (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Guerillas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casinos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Divergent (novel)- Dystopian[edit]
In author Veronica Roth's blog, it is stated that the Chicago in which Divergent novel takes place is Dystopian here and here and also all the notable sources stated it as Dystopian http://www.amazon.com/Divergent-Veronica-Roth/dp/0062024035, http://www.vulture.com/2013/10/divergent-author-veronica-roth-builds-empire.html, http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/divergent-veronica-roth/1026903257?ean=9780062077011, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/uloop/divergent-the-rising-craz_b_3815023.html.--Jockzain (talk) 10:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I myself don't know, why there are no utopian novels and trust me it amazes me too. But I can tell you that in Divergent you can clearly sense that yes the technology is advanced but still the Chicago in which factions are living appears dysoptian.
Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Amyot[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Brian Amyot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AlanS (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan Ziskie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Blacklist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
See revision. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Merry[edit]
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year![edit]
Dear Mdriver1981,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
Disambiguation link notification for January 17[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demonic Toys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Russo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Mdriver1981. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Ronald Hoffman for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald Hoffman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Hoffman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 23:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mdriver1981. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mdriver1981. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Gérard Watkins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Zebuready (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Pet Sematary (1989 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Pornhab with Dr. Screw (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
gnu57 20:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Solving History with Olly Steeds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced article with Olly Steeds. Could barely find anything on ProQuest. Like the name, though.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)