User talk:MattMauler

Click here to add a new message.

Help needed: Jayne Mansfield

A mid-importance article supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers that was reviewed by Version 1.0 Editorial Team and selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions. The article has come a long way from a fan boy mish mash to a fair enough GA. Now is the time to take it to the next level. Currently it's going through another peer review. Serious help is needed to clean up the copy. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 10:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:IPCEXAMPLES

Hi. I saw that you deleted some popcult items from Exhibitionism. I'm not going to contest the deletion, becauise they were borderline notable, but I did want to point out that WP:IPCEXAMPLES, which you cited in your edit summary, is an essay, and is not policy (which must be followed) or a guideline (which it is recommended to follow). Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you for pointing that out. Although I recognize it as a matter of opinion, I agree with most of the essay's points; I think it is truly a helpful guide for determining inclusion/exclusion of popular culture references (in sections which, untended, can grow toward an exhaustive list of mentions in popular culture, regardless of relevance), and I honestly think that the two examples listed added very little to the article or to the understanding of the topic. I would not have re-deleted it but for the fact that I saw other editors attempting the same thing (i.e. in agreement with me). Sincerely, MattMauler (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Really, no problem from me with your actions at all. I'm very strongly in favor of allowing popcult sections in articles, but I also recognize that this creates a responsibility to stop them from growing like topsy, and I frequently remove trivial mentions and non-notable items from them. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Writer's Barnstar
		Nice job on creating Henry Kitchell Webster! Its amazing how many notable writers are still out there without articles!--Milowent • hasspoken 17:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey MattMauler; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

pleaaaase use the edit summary!

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Wuerzele (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Copy Editing

Hai, this Indian film article Loham needs copy editing for grammer and writing style. Previously submitted for GA but failed due to language problem. See Talk:Loham. I invite you to help a hand on it.--Charles Turing (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

OK. I would be glad to help, and I will, but I cannot start any substantial editing until the weekend, unfortunately, 23 October. I will start soon. --MattMauler (talk) 00:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MattMauler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MattMauler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Civ A New Dawn box art.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for ContraPoints

On 7 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ContraPoints, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the YouTube channel ContraPoints releases humorous, left-leaning educational videos responding to the arguments of the growing community of right-wing YouTubers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ContraPoints. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ContraPoints), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Wow, fancy color gradient!

Hey, I love that button customization! If you like to, I'll add it to the examples on Template:User_new_message_large/doc. Or feel free to do so yourself, especially if you have not been editing in the template area before. This might be a nice start for getting a feeling of Wikipedia's template namespace. For me, it was. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, ToBeFree! As the note in the markup says, I modified what I saw on KatnissEverdeen's talk page in order to get what you see here. If you want to add it to the template page, that's fine. I will/would do it eventually, but since there would be a small learning curve for me (as you noted, I have edited very little in template space), it would likely be five to ten days before I got around to it. Either way is fine. --MattMauler (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Hehe, that's nice :) And feel free to take your time, don't hurry. If you'll do it one day, I'd prefer letting you do it yourself, exactly for the learning curve -- you can't break anything, and the documentation is on a separate page that can't disrupt the main template. Even if you would somehow (which I don't believe) manage to mess up the syntax of the documentation page, nothing bad will happen. The template won't be affected, and the edit can easily be undone at any time. You may also use the Wikipedia:Sandbox, or a page like User:MattMauler/sandbox to store a copy that you can experiment with.

I will now add another nice color modification that I have seen on JackintheBox's talk page to the example list. You might like to have a look at the history of Template:User_new_message_large/doc to see how I did that.

But also remember that you don't have to, and if you'd prefer me to do it for you, just ping me with {{u|ToBeFree}} and I'll do it ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

proud boys edit

Your edit to the copy here didn't seem to be typo fixing. I'm alerting you to the fact that I reverted it because I was confused about the summary and I'm not sure what the improvement was. Could you please clarify in the summary if you decide to re-revert. Thanks. Edaham (talk) 05:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

As you can see by looking at the history, the prev version reads, "but although McInnes has denied the group is alt-right, is it one is is one of the few such groups still strongly active after a year in which the broader movement has been battered by lawsuits, deplatforming, and infighting." Clearly confusing and clearly typos, repetition, etc. My edit fixed this. I have not been hanging around the page for any length of time, so you are welcome to add to or change the version I introduced, or to ask for further clarification, but a straight-up revert seems unwarranted from my perspective. I think the changes I made make the lead much clearer. Which part of my version, specifically is unclear?--MattMauler (talk) 17:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

You are correct in saying that I did slightly more than change typos, attempting to make the sentence clearer. I did not, however, alter the meaning (at least as far as I can tell). I have just redone my edit and added a more specific edit summary. Please let me know if there is still confusion.--MattMauler (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

BTW, I really appreciate you approaching me here and explaining your initial revert.--MattMauler (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I was erring on the safe side as that article is prone to dubious edits with murky edit summaries. Your change does seem to shorten and simplify the sentence somewhat. Thanks for being patient. Apologies if I was knee-jerking a bit. It’s one of those articles. Edaham (talk) 17:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

That's understandable! I know that "Fixed typos" is up there with "Added content" on the list of questionable/murky summaries, particularly on a contentious article.--MattMauler (talk) 17:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MattMauler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Silent Film

Hi Matt, I approve of your edit, shortening the refs to a modern silent film, Silent Times. In fact, I contemplated removing the entire section - it smells strongly of self-promotion. Other notable films, e.g. world-famous, Oscar-nominated Aki Kaurismäki's Juha (nomination declined, however - interesting story) are only mentioned in one or two sentences. Do you agree that the section seems promotional? The nominations/awards are from quite minor venues per IMDB. Shall I remove, or at least shorten the lengthy Silent Times synopsis? Regards, --Janke | Talk 09:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Janke: It does sound promotional, I agree, and I would be fine with either reducing it or even removing it completely. I began editing the section, drawn to it by the bare URLs, but I have no attachment to it. Thanks a lot for checking!--MattMauler (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings

The only reliable source for what this book is about would be JRR Tolkien.

As Tolkien has now sadly passed away, it must be left to other scholars to suggest possible meanings and allegories for the Lord of the Rings.

If you were to check the reference sources quoted, you may discover a number of similarities between the symbolism for the 'Order of the Garter' and the 'Lord of the Rings'.

Best Regards,

Bill Stradling — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill stradling (talk • contribs) 13:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page.--MattMauler (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Matt,

The Lord of the Rings is full of puzzles and riddles.

The title of Tolkien's book is clearly another riddle to be solved...

I've not come across a better solution to this riddle than the one proposed by Drew Maloney -

Even the founding location of the Knights of the Garter is closely connected with Oxford where Tolkien was Professor of English.

What would be your definition of a reliable source in the context of explaining the meaning behind the book title of the 'Lord of the Rings'?

As I pointed out earlier, Tolkien would be the only person who could truly answer this puzzle.

I suggest you leave this possible interpretation for the meaning behind the Lord of the Rings on the Wikipedia page unless you can come up with a better answer to this riddle.Bill stradling (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

References

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conan the Barbarian (1982 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Quick question

I am not in favor of unnecessary dead-naming, but what is the policy you were citing in this edit? Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 22:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

@SVTCobra. It's MOS:MULTIPLENAMES: "In the case of transgender and non-binary people, birth names should be included in the lead sentence only when the person was notable under that name." I should have put it in the edit summary, but I didn't because it has come up SO many times on the same article.--MattMauler (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not saying you should have, I've just seen it said so many times without reference, I thought I'd ask you. Thank you for answering. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome. Happy to clarify.--MattMauler (talk) 03:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Heartland (nonfiction book)

On 29 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Heartland (nonfiction book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sarah Smarsh's 2018 memoir Heartland argues that belief in the American Dream leads to the continued oppression of those in poverty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Heartland (nonfiction book). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Heartland (nonfiction book)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

White nationalism

Hi - the only way to deal with the sock edits was to revert deeply, which removed this. I couldn't figure out where to put it. Sorry. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Undo on Super Mario 64

Hi there, looks like you undid an edit on Super Mario 64 which was to fix a CS1 error. As of August 29, 2019, there were changes to the CS1 templates that disallow italic or bold markup in the parameters. https://wiki.alquds.edu/?query=Help:CS1_errors#Italic_or_bold_markup_not_allowed_in:_%7C%3Cparam%3E=

I hope that you can recognize the new CS1 template changes, as the templates put out a CS1 error when markup is in the parameters.

Lzer (talk) 20:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me. I have now changed the "publisher" parameter to "website" to both avoid the CS1 error and preserve the italics (which CS1 templates add automatically for websites, but not publishers).--MattMauler (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Long day

Goodness knows how I managed that. Thanks for the catch. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

No problem!--MattMauler (talk) 03:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Follow up question to the BoM Historicity

Hi Matt.I fear that this question might get lost in the noise, so I wanted to ask you directly here. Do you see any issue with the wording in the lede of this version of Moroni (Book of Mormon)? --FyzixFighter (talk) 18:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Answered on article talk.--MattMauler (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Mughal Empire Flag

The flag with the sun and the lion was used by the Mughals. I verified it from following sources

• [[1]]

The flag of the Mughal empire is a rectangular green triangular banner with a lion in front of a sun, both motifs being gold. It is surrounded by red.

• [[2]]

The first two carry the lion with the sun behind it. Lion (or "Babur" in Persian, the lingua franca of the empire) was also the name of the founder of the Empire, Zaheer-ud Deen Muhammad Babur.

• [[3]]

The Lion and Sun is an old Persian emblem that was re-used by the Mughals that identify strongly with Persian culture.

• [[4]]

The Mughal Empire had a number of imperial flags and standards. The principal imperial standard of the Mughals displayed a lion and sun. The Mughals traced their use of this flag back to Timur [19]. About the historical Persian flags, it can help us the Encyclopaedia Iranica website [20]. Both the Sun and Golden Lion are symbols of kingship and royalty

• Flags of the Mughal Empire

The principal imperial standard of the Mughals was known as the alam (Alam علم). It was primarily moss green.[1] It displayed a lion and sun (Shir-u-khurshid شیر و خورشید‎) facing the hoist of the flag. The Mughals traced their use of the alam back to Timur.[2]

Fictional Flag

What could have I done if somebody uploaded the flag image with that name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemo 838 (talk • contribs)

1. Of the above sources, it looks like only the final one (by Sparavigna) appears to be reliable (see WP:RS), and that source does not have an image of the flag (or at least I was unable to find it).

2. I based my revert only on the description of the image on Wikimedia Commons, which states that it is fictional. I am not well versed in the requirements and policies around adding flags to articles like these, so that is all I was going on. The Wikipedia page to which you link in your comment, Flags of the Mughal Empire, also labels it as fictional. To be honest, I am not certain why it remains up on that page either. This image from that article seems like it might have better historical support, based on design from the time period.

3. The other user who reverted your edit before me referred to a policy unfamiliar to me in their edit summary (the link to it didn't work), so there might be another issue with the addition of the flag, but I am not sure what that is, so I recommend you approach them about it or bring it up on the article talk page.--MattMauler (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Frederick Remington

Hi MackMauler! I'm related to Frederick Remington. Our paternal lineage comes from a Puritan who departed from England in about 1633. Please refer to Richard Remington who was a pastor at St Mary's Church, Lockington, East Riding, Yorkshire, England. I'm not sure how to get you my email in a less public way The Pete's (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Oops, MattMauler The Pete's (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Dorothy Pitman Hughes

Dorothy Pitman Hughes was not a founder of Ms. magazine. The article about Dorothy and Gloria Steinem in Esquire magazine helped demonstrate the need for a women's-controlled media outlet. This fact is based on the Dorothy Pitman Hughes archives at Smith College. Please see Laura L. Lovett, With Her Fist Raised: Dorothy Pitman Hughes and the Transformative Power of Community Activism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2021. Professor Lovett's research is based on interviews with Pitman Hughes. She arranged to have the material donated to the archives. This claim is just false and should be removed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.98.201.145 (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

It would be better to raise this issue on the article's talkpage where other frequent editors of the article can see it. Thank you for citing a secondary source for support. This will be important for demonstrating to others on the article talkpage as well.--MattMauler (talk) 02:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Mehmed the Conqueror

Hi, regarding ur edit at Mehmed the Conqueror, Laonikos Chalkokondyles is not a secondary source. To quote WP:USEPRIMARY:

- A primary source was a source that was created at about the same time as the event, regardless of the source's contents. Laonikos Chalkokondyles lived and wrote his works during the life of Mehmed and it's knows to have personally witnessed some of the events regarding Mehmed.

- [secondary sources]  it describes, comments on, or analyzes primary sources. Laonikos Chalkokondyles does not describe, comment on or analyzers primary sources, because he's the primary source.

- The first published source for any given fact is always considered a primary source. At this point, they make it obvious. Laonikos is the first one to explicitly describe the Sultan's sexual tendencies and his relationship with Radu the Fair. There are others things that suggest it, like Radu's nickname in Romanian ("the Beautiful", referring to effeminate features).

Now a quick question: What type of source is a book from 1992 about Mehmed II (Babinger, Franz (1992), ""Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time"")? It's beyond any doubt a secondary source. Please check all sources before targeting only the sources you don't like. Thanks! Cheers! --213.233.110.242 (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Did you come to the right editor's talkpage? Please look at my edit summaries again. I know that Chalkokondyles is a primary source, so I removed the extended quotation from his work and referred to the WP policy. I also know that Babinger is a secondary source, so I re-added him when another editor tried to remove content from his source. In my edit summary for that second edit, I stated clearly that Babinger and Hanak are scholarly secondary sources. ... So it sounds like we're in agreement(?)
Also, in the future, please bring things like this up on the article talkpage rather than here.--MattMauler (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I believe this edit [5] belongs to you. You invoked the fact that the quotation was too long, but removed my edit as a whole. I will adjust my edit and cut the quote short since it's true that it's too long. I saw there are many attempts from Turkophiles users to remove my content since it s regarded as offensive. But this is Wikipedia, so truth shall prevail. I suggest enabling an edit protection on the page in the future.

PS: Sorry if I sounded argumentative, that wasn t my intention. Cheers! --213.233.110.242 (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Love (TV series)

I undid my own mistake. I added the producers before I realized they were already listed as executive producers so it was just unnecessarily repetitive. Generally when undoing my own edits after realizing I made a mistake I don't add a reason to my edit as I'm erasing my own edit. Thanks. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of You Can't Live Forever

The article You Can't Live Forever has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability; fails WP:PRIMARY, being sourced solely to the book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

ContraPoints edit

Heyya,

I've posted a new thread on the talk page, as per your suggestion, but I was wondering how I could source the information, as the link to the instagram post seems a little messy. Also I'm not sure how the neutrality of the article could be affected by adding something that ContraPoints has posted publicly.

Thank you so much in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LivvyPool (talk • contribs) 08:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

@LivvyPool:, I've answered your questions on the article talkpage; thanks for starting that conversation.--MattMauler (talk) 18:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upton Sinclair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ophelia Pastrana

Hello,

You just created a conflict of editions in the article of Ophelia Pastrana. I am actively working on it as you can see with the two templates shown at the beginning of the article. You just made me loose a whole section I was actively creating. I would suggest you to please respect the work of others. Your help is appreciated but please do so in articles that don not contain templates indicating that other editors are woking on it. Marifer Veloz (talk) 18:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

@Marifer Veloz:, I understand, and I am sorry about that.
Please see MOS:GENDERID. Was Ophelia a notable person under her previous name? If not, it does not look like it should be included, according to WP guidelines.
Thanks for the work you are doing. I will wait until you are finished to edit any more.--MattMauler (talk) 18:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

There will be blood

Your statement is not the way the Development section of the film says it happened when you state: "Schlosser's book Fast Food Nation was compared to the The Jungle, not There Will Be Blood". It says it was a two step process; that he first read The Jungle and then read the book "Oil". He then only used the first 150 pages of Oil, and the rest was developed from his other readings of Sinclair's books starting with The Jungle. If you can word it better then that's fine, though reverting it fully does not seem correct. HenryRoan (talk) 02:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

@HenryRoan:, my statement in the edit summary was in response to the text I removed, which said The film There Will Be Blood has been compared to Sinclair's The Jungle, which is false. Even in the There Will Be Blood Wikipedia article, it does not say that the film was compared to The Jungle.
I know that P. T. Anderson read the book Oil! and then used only the first 150 pages for the adaption. It is still unclear to me how the text was relevant to this article, which about The Jungle. The other article is about a film version of a different one of Sinclair's novels. Yes, Schlosser read The Jungle and then bought the rights to Oil!, but it seems like too tenuous of a connection to me for The Jungle article itself. I think if there were a longer "legacy" section, then perhaps it could go there, but even then I would leave out the part about Oil! entirely and just say that Schlosser's Fast Food Nation was compared to The Jungle because The Jungle became the best-known example of book-length muckraking journalism (...even though it's a novel). At this point, we would need more than this factoid to create a "legacy" section, I think, but it could eventually be included, perhaps.--MattMauler (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

A legacy section sounds like a good idea for the book article. Its likely a good idea for the film article as well. I have added a little to the adaptations section for The Jungle which gives more weight to that section, eventually there might be enough for the Legacy section which you suggest. You can edit the wording I added to improve it as needed. HenryRoan (talk) 02:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Anarchism

Hi MattMauler,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself! We also have a stub (short article) expansion drive, if you'd like to participate.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 21:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)