User talk:LogX/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

New Page Patrol (2)

Hi. I did ask you if you could please not patrol new pages until you have learned the ropes. Please also see WP:OVERTAGGING. I'm also concerned that you may be unnecessarily moving movie pages. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Fine! -- L o g X 14:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation of film titles

Per WP:NCF and WP:TITLE, disambiguation of film titles is only necessary "if a film shares its title with one or more non-film topics on Wikipedia". Please do not add parenthetical disambiguation to film titles, unless there is another article on Wikipedia that the title could apply to. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 13:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah sure. Thanks mate! -- L o g X 18:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

List of Highest Grossing Bollywood movies

Earlier these were incomplete lists and they did not show complete lists and were extracts but now they are edited and are complete top 10 lists. eg earlier entries were like at no 1, then at no 4 and then at no 6 and so on but now complete lists of top ten. Only one table still has extracts and its heading is not changed and still shows as extract

Here is reference... movie running in Californis...http://www.nowrunning.com/yeh-jawani-hai-deewani-in-california/usa/ca/9578/movie-showtimes.htm... but can we clutter the box with all these references

Kindly pls undo your edit and place the ref where you find it suitable... I cant find place for ref... because all ref are for grossing income and placed in grossing column

Because it was not looking good... someone had made a seperate column for ref... I moved them to gross income column because all were were regarding earning, on the basis of which movies are ranked

I think we should put blue color on only first and second box... who will remove from so many boxes as movie will only run few more days

The table is perfect now... you are welcome to improve it further but do not reveret my edit as it was not correct earlier as at some places blue color was there and at some places it was not there Luckydhaliwal (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you please have a look at the page now? The tables were collapsed. Did you see that or not? -- L o g X 19:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes I just saw... you corrected my mistakes... thanks a lot... the page is perfect now Luckydhaliwal (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

it was me who made a seperate column for ref, because there were (and still are) so many users who change the box-office gross without referring any reliable sources. In general it looks proper (see highest-grossing films) but the missing reference for Jab Tak Hai Jaan enlarged the row. By the way, nearly all the lists concerning Hindi films are missing accuracy in citing sources. The editors should be more concerned about this wiki custom, but I can't write all of them personally. Hoerestimmen (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey LogX. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LogX. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 20:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irai Anbu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Bruna Abdullah

Hello, i don't see what wrong in the page that i had recently edit. You had came to fast i was working on that. Actually, when you reverted it i was on the editing section. For showing your interest i feel bless but let me do my work. The page was even more inappropriate, hence i had started working on it. Hope, you got enough time to View The History.

Archana Ramdonee 18:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Of course I did. If a person has more than one Nationality, then it should cite a reliable source. I didn't see any sources for your edits. So, I reverted them. If you have a source then go ahead and add them with a citation. Thanks -- L o g X 18:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't teach i know all this. Please take an advice View The History before you revert any page. It is silly when i was the one who been working on it since many time doing my research and edit it. All of a sudden, someone came and reverted everything. Just go watch your page which you had edit or create. Any case, you should edit the source and remove the Nationality it would be easy. Like fool you had revert it and change image and all.

After completing my edits on the page will inform to check it, because you seemed kind showing a lot of interest in these page. Anything make to your differ you just edit or revert do your research present better than me. Hope, you get that time to do it.

Archana Ramdonee 19:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't mean that your Edit history on the page shows the ownership. Everyone can contribute to Wikipedia. -- L o g X 19:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Tamilnadu

hi you have removed contents and tables from article namely called Tamilnadu .you have mentioned that the reason is unwanted tables removed.may i know how it could be unwanted?do you expect everything could be placed basis on someone wants?Is it so?please let me know?--Eshwar.om ^{Talk tome} 20:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't have any sources and the article is not a travelling guide which denotes that it has many ritual places. -- L o g X 20:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

ok!It does not have many sources.but there are not many ritual places.only 275 which are all belongs to Tamil literature,culture from the date b/w 7 th to 9 th century AD.Do you need further info regarding?--Eshwar.om ^{Talk tome}21:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

In India Huge numbers of ancient temple can see only at Tamilnadu.Bhakti movement originated in ancient Tamil Nadu. The Nayanmars and the Alvars played a major role in the Bhakti movement. The Bhakti movement began to spread to the north during the late medieval ages when north India .Please could find the information regarding at Official website of Goverment of India.N numbers are temples could be available in the indian state of Tamilnadu.but mentioned only 275 which are all so called needed for this article.so i hope those will not be travel guide for this article,always info guide,dont you thing the same?--Eshwar.om ^{Talk tome} 21:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Naanum Madurai kaaran dhaan pa............. -- Lo g X 21:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Enikindra intha iniya taai moli vaarthaikal Enakku oru kanam Unmaiyil inba adirchi .Anbu ullam vaalvaangu vaala iraiarul thunai nirka vaalthukkal .tangal unnatha pani inithe thodaravaum vaalthukkal .All the very best Bro.God bless you!:)--Eshwar.om ^{Talk tome} 22:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Nandri!!! -- L o g X 13:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Raghuram Rajan

You clearly do not understand that it is possible to change citizenship. You are quoting a 2005 article for Raghuram's citizenship which is just an outdated info. He became a US Citizen between 2005 and 2013. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 146.127.253.44 (talk) 19:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for being a good contributor. ///EuroCar GT21:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the cookie! It's really a pleasure to be a Wikipedia contributor! -- L o g X 21:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

re: template

Could you add it? I'm knee deep into RFPP. (If we protect it with Twinkle it adds the tag automagically, but if we do it with the protect button it doesn't.) Thanks. Krakatoa Katie 18:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I tried that. But, no use! Is there any issue on protecting the pages :-/ -- L o g X 18:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll take care of it now. Thanks for letting me know; I'll see if I accidentally fully protected it, but I don't think so.Krakatoa Katie 18:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

That's fine! -- L o g X 18:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Well... turns out I didn't protect it at all. Don't know what happened there because I always protect the page before I come back and log it, but Mark Arsten took care of it and tagged it. Good thing RFPP is caught up now so I can go read ANI instead of leading people down the primrose path. ;-) Krakatoa Katie 18:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Haha! Have a good time! :) -- L o g X 18:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LogX. You have new messages at ColinFine's talk page.
Message added 08:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ColinFine (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Mukesh Ambani

I undid your revert as the source appears to support the IP's change. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Turning off feedback

Anytime!--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

--    L o g  X   21:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Be more careful PLEASE

This is the second time in two days I've seen an incorrectly labelled revert from you on an article on my watchlist. WP:AGF and doing a quick search shows there is a Rock Beach in Pondicherry and the newbie editor should not have gotten warned at all[1]. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Those pictures were WP:COPYVIO that's why I reverted those edits. --    L o g  X   18:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Please specify how they were a copyright violation? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I thought those pictures were didn't attain the WP:V. That's why I reverted them. Is there any wrong on that? --    L o g  X   18:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes. First you said, they were "disruptive images with no encyclopedic value." Next you said they were copyright violations. Now you're saying that the picture is not of Rock Beach in Pondicherry? Is that right? Why are you saying that? Remember that we do not require photos to have sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Fine. I'm sorry for that. But, if you see history on the page you are saying. You may come to know why I tagged with that words. --    Lo g  X   18:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

You can revert, that's fine. But be aware that in this case it was your editorial decision, not vandalism, not copyright issues, and not verifiability issues. A new editor was bitten (I've apologized to them). I only bring this up as you also did an incorrect revert yesterday. Too many of these and you'll get other editors asking exactly what are you doing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Please have a look at [here] .--   L o g  X   18:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I was about to revert that as well but the warning you gave is completely incorrect. There's no indication the editoruploaded the file, it will not be deleted, and the photo is not "not constructive". --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Alright! I will be careful in the future hereafter! Sorry again! --    L o g  X   19:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5