User talk:Leornendeealdenglisc

Wesaþ ġē hāl and wilcume tō mīnum trametemōtung. Hello everyone and welcome to my discussion page. For serious matters, please type your section in Modern English, please.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Leornendeealdenglisc/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Leornendeealdenglisc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Leornendeealdenglisc/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 03:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Sagas of Veluwe, from its old location at User:Leornendeealdenglisc/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 22:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) I apologize for the failure of the previous reviewer o recognize the importance. I checked, and found the Dutch WP has a bio of the compiler, which provides sufficient information and has some further sources. I'll try to work on this further, or you can. I will probably move it directly to article space. after I've touched it up a little.[reply]

Please do continue writing article on subjects you know about andare interested in. We're working on improving the quality of our reviewing. DGG ( talk ) 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

On Wiktionary.org, I created an entry called ġingra for the Old English Lemmas but I would like the entry name just to be gingra. How can I do this?

Kevin

@Leornendeealdenglisc: Personally, I suggest that you settle that on Wiktionary.org Editor 357 (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antwerpian dialect for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antwerpian dialect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antwerpian dialect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hwaet?

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Pagans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ganna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

translation help request[edit]

Hey, Leornendeealdenglisc! I have some 13th century German I'm trying to get translated for the article Kifli:

dô brâchten im die pecken

chipfen und weiʒe flecken,

weiʒer dann ein hermelein.

Any chance you'd be able to help, or point me at someone else who could?

Thanks so much! --valereee (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fornjót (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kari

Logi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eisa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fornjót, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Cat

Edmundskind (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dawn goddesses[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Dawn goddesses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]