User talk:Headbomb/unreliable

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is The Paper (newspaper) unreliable?[edit]

Moved from User talk:Headbomb

Flagged by your script. I am having trouble finding justification in RSP or RSN archives? Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here 07:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sister publication of Sixth Tone. RSP splits it into two categories, so this should probably be yellow. I'll investigate more later today. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Any thoughts? In other news, a bunch of red-tagged sources from here should probably be yellow, given how much that discussion was disrupted by socks. (And some non-colored sources could be yellowed too - I'd suggest making everythign from 'naTemat' below yellow, except Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ping. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ping ping? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Moved to yellow. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Headbomb Thank you for this. How about the adjustment to the Polish sources I pointed out above? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You'll have to be more specific and point to RSN discussions because from a relatively long glance at things, I fail to see where removing the socks chance the outcome of these discussions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply][edit] probably ought to be flagged by your script the same way other WP:UGC sources are. Amigao (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, flagged as generally unreliable. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Baidu Baike sister site[edit]

Yet another sister site for WP:BAIDUBAIKE:

Amigao (talk) 04:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stylesheets and dark mode[edit]

Hi Headbomb. I love the script. I have a request. Rather than inserting a style into each modified anchor, could you please instead add a class to the <a> and perhaps also the parent element if it's a related like <cite> elements? You can then inject a short stylesheet into the document like:

a.source-blacklisted { "background-color": "#dddddd", "text-decoration":"underline", "text-decoration-style": "wavy", "text-decoration-color": "#cc0000"; }
a.source-unreliable { "background-color": "#ffdddd"; }

And so on. While overriding with a title selector is possible, using classes would make it easier (and cleaner) for dark mode users to override the styling with CSS. The current colors are not really usable in dark mode. Adding a class to the parent element would also allow people to highlight the parent element with CSS. You could probably also group the styles a bit more cleanly than the current implementation (it looks like multiple groups intentionally share the same styling). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]