User talk:Enthusiast01

Disambiguation link notification for September 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nuclear facilities in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gamma irradiation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentlemen Prefer Nature Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shareholder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Priority.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At Energy in Lebanon, you added two sentences cited to https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/fuel-shortage-in-lebanon-leaves-the-country-without-power-681499. I've provided your text and the source's text so the overlap can be seen:

Your text:

Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that in 2021 was in short supply.

In October 2021, Lebanon had no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced the shutting down of its two largest power stations, the Zahrani power station and the Deir Ammar plant.

Source text:

Many Lebanese normally rely on private generators that run on diesel, although that is in short supply.

Lebanon has no centrally generated electricity after fuel shortages forced its two largest power stations to shut down, a government official told Reuters on Saturday.

You later rephrased the second sentence into:

In October 2021, Lebanon’s two largest power stations—the Zahrani and the Deir Ammar power stations—were shut down due to fuel shortages, leaving Lebanon with no centrally generated electricity

But you kept the first sentence the same. I looked a bit more and then found you adding this

An industry source said at the time that Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including 370 MW from the Karpowership barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW.

The Reuters source says:

An industry source said Lebanon's total capacity was about 2,200 MW, including the barges, but was only generating 1,300 MW, including the Turkish supplies of 370 MW. Lebanon’s peak demand in 2020 was 3,500 MW, the source said.

I noticed you copied text from our French article in between your edits on the article; I checked there first to make sure this wasn't you accidentally translating in copyvio. These are, at best, an example of close paraphrasing. Spanning back to 2007, you were warned at least 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 times before you were blocked for copyright violations in July 2016. Between the block, you edited as User:Bullaful and User:Rogr101, and through the suspicions of Flyer22 these socking issues were brought to AN where those accounts were blocked and the community seemed uninterested in your attempt to be unblocked. You were unblocked by Diannaa after your answers satisfied her that you would no longer violate copyright. However, since then, there have been 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 warnings.

But wait, no- just as I was finishing writing this, I see you created Nada Boustani Khouri- which is a borderline G12 of https://www.energyreviewmena.com/news-interviews/item/276-lebanon-welcomes-new-minister-of-energy. Seriously?

This is not acceptable, especially for someone with 66,000+ edits. Sorry- I have no choice but to indefinitely block you, and open a contributor copyright investigation where your edits will be systemically viewed for copyright violations. Given the extent and history here, I will notify the community about this. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 03:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]